Recurrent aphthous stomatitis and neoplasms of the mouth and pharynx: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Youzhan Yang, Jincheng Zhang, Chunsheng Yuan, Zhiqiang Cheng
{"title":"Recurrent aphthous stomatitis and neoplasms of the mouth and pharynx: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.","authors":"Youzhan Yang, Jincheng Zhang, Chunsheng Yuan, Zhiqiang Cheng","doi":"10.1186/s12885-024-13140-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The association between recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) and neoplasms of the mouth and pharynx (NOMAP) has been reported in some previous observational studies. However, causality is still confused. Our research aims to explore the relationship between RAS and NOMAP through a Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis and to explore whether RAS can serve as a risk factor for NOMAP to provide a reference for the clinical strategy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An exposure dataset for RAS were collected from a published study based on the UK Biobank (UKB). Outcome datasets included Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) summary statistics of NOMAP from the FinnGen datasets. The core method was inverse variance weighting (IVW). The Bonferroni correction, MR-Egger, weighted median, weighted mode, Cochcan's Q test, MR-PRESSO, and leave-one-out methods served as complementary methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found no significant evidence of causal relationships between RAS and NOMAP. After applying the Bonferroni correction, the corrected P was equal to 0.00625 (0.05/1/8). The IVW method provided the sole evidence for RAS on Benign neoplasm of floor of mouth (BNFM) (OR = 2.509, 95% CI: 1.296-4.857, P = 0.006), but the subsequent MR-Egger regression method showed that this result may be due to horizontal pleiotropy (P = 0.035). The Cochran Q-test, MR-Egger regression, and MR-PRESSO did not reveal any heterogeneity or directional pleiotropy for the other outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, this is the first MR analysis to investigate the relationship between RAS and NOMAP. Our research confirmed at the genetic level that no causal association has been identified between RAS and NOMAP, therefore facilitating a logical therapeutic perspective and the development of clinical therapies for them.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"24 1","pages":"1372"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11550542/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-13140-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The association between recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) and neoplasms of the mouth and pharynx (NOMAP) has been reported in some previous observational studies. However, causality is still confused. Our research aims to explore the relationship between RAS and NOMAP through a Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis and to explore whether RAS can serve as a risk factor for NOMAP to provide a reference for the clinical strategy.

Methods: An exposure dataset for RAS were collected from a published study based on the UK Biobank (UKB). Outcome datasets included Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) summary statistics of NOMAP from the FinnGen datasets. The core method was inverse variance weighting (IVW). The Bonferroni correction, MR-Egger, weighted median, weighted mode, Cochcan's Q test, MR-PRESSO, and leave-one-out methods served as complementary methods.

Results: We found no significant evidence of causal relationships between RAS and NOMAP. After applying the Bonferroni correction, the corrected P was equal to 0.00625 (0.05/1/8). The IVW method provided the sole evidence for RAS on Benign neoplasm of floor of mouth (BNFM) (OR = 2.509, 95% CI: 1.296-4.857, P = 0.006), but the subsequent MR-Egger regression method showed that this result may be due to horizontal pleiotropy (P = 0.035). The Cochran Q-test, MR-Egger regression, and MR-PRESSO did not reveal any heterogeneity or directional pleiotropy for the other outcomes.

Conclusions: In conclusion, this is the first MR analysis to investigate the relationship between RAS and NOMAP. Our research confirmed at the genetic level that no causal association has been identified between RAS and NOMAP, therefore facilitating a logical therapeutic perspective and the development of clinical therapies for them.

复发性口腔炎与口腔和咽部肿瘤:双样本孟德尔随机研究。
背景:以前的一些观察性研究报告了复发性口腔炎(RAS)与口腔和咽部肿瘤(NOMAP)之间的关联。然而,两者之间的因果关系仍然扑朔迷离。我们的研究旨在通过孟德尔随机分析(MR)探讨RAS与NOMAP之间的关系,并探讨RAS是否可作为NOMAP的风险因素,为临床策略提供参考:从基于英国生物库(UKB)的一项已发表的研究中收集了RAS的暴露数据集。结果数据集包括来自芬兰基因数据集的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)NOMAP汇总统计数据。核心方法是反方差加权法(IVW)。Bonferroni校正、MR-Egger、加权中位数、加权模式、Cochcan's Q检验、MR-PRESSO和leave-one-out方法作为补充方法:结果:我们没有发现 RAS 与 NOMAP 之间存在因果关系的重要证据。应用 Bonferroni 校正后,校正后的 P 等于 0.00625(0.05/1/8)。IVW 方法提供了 RAS 与口底良性肿瘤(BNFM)有关的唯一证据(OR = 2.509,95% CI:1.296-4.857,P = 0.006),但随后的 MR-Egger 回归方法显示,这一结果可能是由于水平多效性造成的(P = 0.035)。Cochran Q检验、MR-Egger回归和MR-PRESSO均未发现其他结果存在异质性或方向性多向性:总之,这是首个研究 RAS 与 NOMAP 关系的 MR 分析。我们的研究在基因水平上证实了 RAS 和 NOMAP 之间没有因果关系,因此有助于从合理的治疗角度开发针对它们的临床疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信