Ten-year analgesic utilization patterns and economic implications in Portugal.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Nuno Duarte, João Paulo Martins, Jose-Ángel García-Pedraza, Marlene Santos
{"title":"Ten-year analgesic utilization patterns and economic implications in Portugal.","authors":"Nuno Duarte, João Paulo Martins, Jose-Ángel García-Pedraza, Marlene Santos","doi":"10.1111/bcp.16333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study evaluated the 10-year consumption and economic patterns of classical analgesics, adjuvants and opioids in Portugal (2012-2022), and conducted a comparative analysis between Portugal, Spain and Denmark to explore the consumption patterns among these countries for 2022.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on sales and national health service (NHS) costs were obtained from the Portuguese National Authority of Medicines and Health Products. Sales data were converted to defined daily dose (DDD) per 1000 inhabitants per day according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification/DDD methodology, while comparisons between Spain and Denmark were evaluated with the chi-square test, when appropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings reveal that classical analgesics use in Portugal remained stable during the period 2012-2022, with ibuprofen being the most consumed. Adjuvants, specifically gabapentinoids, experienced an 84% increase in use, primarily attributed to pregabalin. Weak opioids, led by tramadol, witnessed a 117% rise in use, while strong opioid use, led by tapentadol, increased by 618%. Portugal presented the lowest overall opioid consumption when compared to Denmark and Spain in 2022. Economic trends indicated a heightened NHS expenditure on analgesics, primarily driven by increased opioid use. Notwithstanding, there was no significant burden on relative expenditure over the 10-year period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Portugal presented a major increase in both weak and strong opioid prescriptions, aligning with the trends for Spain and Denmark. The development and approval of generic medicines and vigilant market monitoring are imperative strategies for managing the escalated costs resulting from heightened consumption, particularly concerning opioids.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.16333","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: This study evaluated the 10-year consumption and economic patterns of classical analgesics, adjuvants and opioids in Portugal (2012-2022), and conducted a comparative analysis between Portugal, Spain and Denmark to explore the consumption patterns among these countries for 2022.

Methods: Data on sales and national health service (NHS) costs were obtained from the Portuguese National Authority of Medicines and Health Products. Sales data were converted to defined daily dose (DDD) per 1000 inhabitants per day according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification/DDD methodology, while comparisons between Spain and Denmark were evaluated with the chi-square test, when appropriate.

Results: The findings reveal that classical analgesics use in Portugal remained stable during the period 2012-2022, with ibuprofen being the most consumed. Adjuvants, specifically gabapentinoids, experienced an 84% increase in use, primarily attributed to pregabalin. Weak opioids, led by tramadol, witnessed a 117% rise in use, while strong opioid use, led by tapentadol, increased by 618%. Portugal presented the lowest overall opioid consumption when compared to Denmark and Spain in 2022. Economic trends indicated a heightened NHS expenditure on analgesics, primarily driven by increased opioid use. Notwithstanding, there was no significant burden on relative expenditure over the 10-year period.

Conclusions: Portugal presented a major increase in both weak and strong opioid prescriptions, aligning with the trends for Spain and Denmark. The development and approval of generic medicines and vigilant market monitoring are imperative strategies for managing the escalated costs resulting from heightened consumption, particularly concerning opioids.

葡萄牙十年镇痛药使用模式及经济影响。
目的:本研究评估了葡萄牙传统镇痛药、辅助剂和阿片类药物的10年消费和经济模式(2012-2022年),并对葡萄牙、西班牙和丹麦进行了比较分析,以探讨这些国家2022年的消费模式:方法:从葡萄牙国家药品和保健品管理局获取销售和国家医疗服务(NHS)成本数据。销售数据根据解剖学治疗化学(ATC)分类/DDD方法转换为每千人每天的定义日剂量(DDD),而西班牙和丹麦之间的比较则酌情使用卡方检验进行评估:研究结果表明,2012-2022 年期间,葡萄牙传统止痛药的使用量保持稳定,其中布洛芬的使用量最大。辅助镇痛药,特别是加巴喷丁类镇痛药的使用量增加了 84%,这主要归功于普瑞巴林。以曲马多为首的弱阿片类药物的使用量增长了 117%,而以他喷他多为首的强阿片类药物的使用量增长了 618%。与丹麦和西班牙相比,葡萄牙在2022年的阿片类药物总体消费量最低。经济趋势表明,主要受阿片类药物使用量增加的影响,国家医疗服务体系在镇痛药方面的支出有所增加。尽管如此,在这10年期间,相对支出并没有显著增加:葡萄牙的弱阿片类药物和强阿片类药物处方大幅增加,与西班牙和丹麦的趋势一致。开发和批准非专利药品以及对市场进行警惕性监控是管理因消费增加(尤其是阿片类药物)而导致的成本上升的必要策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
419
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信