Targeted antimicrobial regimens for Gram-negative prosthetic joint infections: a prospective multicenter study.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Jaap L J Hanssen, Robert J P van der Wal, Rachid Mahdad, Stefan Keizer, Nathalie M Delfos, Joris C T van der Lugt, Karin Ellen Veldkamp, Peter A Nolte, Masja Leendertse, Luc B S Gelinck, Femke P N Mollema, Emile F Schippers, Hanke G Wattel-Louis, Rob G H H Nelissen, Henk Scheper, Mark G J de Boer
{"title":"Targeted antimicrobial regimens for Gram-negative prosthetic joint infections: a prospective multicenter study.","authors":"Jaap L J Hanssen, Robert J P van der Wal, Rachid Mahdad, Stefan Keizer, Nathalie M Delfos, Joris C T van der Lugt, Karin Ellen Veldkamp, Peter A Nolte, Masja Leendertse, Luc B S Gelinck, Femke P N Mollema, Emile F Schippers, Hanke G Wattel-Louis, Rob G H H Nelissen, Henk Scheper, Mark G J de Boer","doi":"10.1128/aac.01232-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fluoroquinolones (FQs) are considered the most effective antimicrobial treatment for Gram-negative prosthetic joint infection (GN-PJI). Alternatives are needed due to increasing FQ resistance and side effects. We aimed to compare different targeted antimicrobial strategies for GN-PJI managed by debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) or one-stage revision surgery (1SR) and to review the literature of oral treatment options for GN-PJI. In this prospective, multicenter, registry-based study, all consecutive patients with a PJI caused by a Gram-negative microorganism (including mixed infections with Gram-positive microorganisms), managed with DAIR or 1SR from 2015 to 2020, were included. Minimum follow-up was 1 year. Patients underwent targeted therapy with oral FQ, oral cotrimoxazole, or intravenous or oral β-lactams. Survival analysis was performed with use of Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models to identify factors potentially associated with treatment failure. Seventy-four patients who received either FQ (<i>n</i> = 47, 64%), cotrimoxazole (<i>n</i> = 13, 18%), or β-lactams (<i>n</i> = 14, 18%) were included. Surgical strategy consisted of DAIR (<i>n</i> = 72) or 1SR (<i>n</i> = 2). Median follow-up was 449 days (interquartile range 89-738 days). Failure free survival did not differ between the FQ (72%) and cotrimoxazole (92%) groups (log rank, <i>P</i> = 0.13). This outcome did not change when excluding all pseudomonal PJI in the FQ group. Cotrimoxazole is a potential effective targeted antimicrobial therapy for patients with GN-PJI. A randomized controlled trial is needed to confirm the findings of this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":8152,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01232-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fluoroquinolones (FQs) are considered the most effective antimicrobial treatment for Gram-negative prosthetic joint infection (GN-PJI). Alternatives are needed due to increasing FQ resistance and side effects. We aimed to compare different targeted antimicrobial strategies for GN-PJI managed by debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) or one-stage revision surgery (1SR) and to review the literature of oral treatment options for GN-PJI. In this prospective, multicenter, registry-based study, all consecutive patients with a PJI caused by a Gram-negative microorganism (including mixed infections with Gram-positive microorganisms), managed with DAIR or 1SR from 2015 to 2020, were included. Minimum follow-up was 1 year. Patients underwent targeted therapy with oral FQ, oral cotrimoxazole, or intravenous or oral β-lactams. Survival analysis was performed with use of Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models to identify factors potentially associated with treatment failure. Seventy-four patients who received either FQ (n = 47, 64%), cotrimoxazole (n = 13, 18%), or β-lactams (n = 14, 18%) were included. Surgical strategy consisted of DAIR (n = 72) or 1SR (n = 2). Median follow-up was 449 days (interquartile range 89-738 days). Failure free survival did not differ between the FQ (72%) and cotrimoxazole (92%) groups (log rank, P = 0.13). This outcome did not change when excluding all pseudomonal PJI in the FQ group. Cotrimoxazole is a potential effective targeted antimicrobial therapy for patients with GN-PJI. A randomized controlled trial is needed to confirm the findings of this study.

针对革兰氏阴性假体关节感染的抗菌方案:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
氟喹诺酮类药物(FQs)被认为是治疗革兰氏阴性假体关节感染(GN-PJI)最有效的抗菌药物。由于氟喹诺酮类药物耐药性和副作用不断增加,因此需要替代药物。我们旨在比较清创、抗生素和植入物保留(DAIR)或一期翻修手术(1SR)治疗 GN-PJI 的不同靶向抗菌策略,并回顾 GN-PJI 口服治疗方案的文献。在这项以登记为基础的前瞻性多中心研究中,纳入了 2015 年至 2020 年期间所有由革兰阴性微生物(包括革兰阳性微生物混合感染)引起的 PJI 患者,这些患者均接受了 DAIR 或 1SR 治疗。最少随访 1 年。患者接受了口服 FQ、口服复方新诺明或静脉注射或口服 β-内酰胺类药物的靶向治疗。采用卡普兰-梅耶模型和考克斯比例危险模型进行生存分析,以确定与治疗失败可能相关的因素。74名患者接受了FQ(47人,64%)、复方新诺明(13人,18%)或β-内酰胺(14人,18%)治疗。手术策略包括 DAIR(72 例)或 1SR(2 例)。随访中位数为 449 天(四分位数间距为 89-738 天)。FQ组(72%)和复方新诺明组(92%)的无失败生存率没有差异(对数秩,P = 0.13)。在排除 FQ 组的所有假性 PJI 后,这一结果没有变化。复方新诺明是针对 GN-PJI 患者的一种潜在有效的靶向抗菌疗法。需要进行随机对照试验来证实本研究的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
8.20%
发文量
762
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (AAC) features interdisciplinary studies that build our understanding of the underlying mechanisms and therapeutic applications of antimicrobial and antiparasitic agents and chemotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信