Nicola J Vickery, Alexander J Fowler, John Prowle, Rupert Pearse
{"title":"Association between multimorbidity and quality of life after hip replacement surgery: analysis of routinely collected patient-reported outcomes.","authors":"Nicola J Vickery, Alexander J Fowler, John Prowle, Rupert Pearse","doi":"10.1016/j.bja.2024.08.037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Total hip replacement surgery is performed to improve quality of life (QoL). We explored the association between multimorbidity and change in QoL after total hip replacement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Analysis of patients included in the NHS England hip replacement Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) database with complete preoperative from 3 to 6 months postoperative EQ-5D QoL data from April 2013 to March 2018. Multimorbidity was defined as two or more chronic diseases excluding arthritis. The primary outcome measure was change in QoL using the Pareto Classification of Health Change. We compared QoL change for patients with and without multimorbidity and those with no multimorbidity using multivariable modelling. Data are presented as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval or n (%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 216,191 patients, we included 178,129 (82.4%) patients with complete data. Most patients 63,327 (35.6%) were 70-79 yr of age, and 98,513 (55.3%) were women. Multimorbidity was present in 38,384 patients (21.6%). QoL improved after surgery for 149,774 (84.1%) patients, remained unchanged for 10,219 (5.7%) patients, and became worse after surgery for 7289 (4.1%) patients. QoL changes were mixed (at least one QoL domain improved and at least one deteriorated) for 10,847 (6.1%) patients. Poor QoL outcomes (unchanged/mixed/worse) were more likely for patients with multimorbidity (OR 1.53 [1.49-1.58]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hip replacement surgery improves QoL. However, patients with multimorbidity are less likely to experience these benefits. Poor QoL outcomes became more frequent as the number of comorbid diseases increased. These data should inform shared decision-making conversations around joint replacement surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":9250,"journal":{"name":"British journal of anaesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2024.08.037","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Total hip replacement surgery is performed to improve quality of life (QoL). We explored the association between multimorbidity and change in QoL after total hip replacement.
Methods: Analysis of patients included in the NHS England hip replacement Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) database with complete preoperative from 3 to 6 months postoperative EQ-5D QoL data from April 2013 to March 2018. Multimorbidity was defined as two or more chronic diseases excluding arthritis. The primary outcome measure was change in QoL using the Pareto Classification of Health Change. We compared QoL change for patients with and without multimorbidity and those with no multimorbidity using multivariable modelling. Data are presented as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval or n (%).
Results: Of 216,191 patients, we included 178,129 (82.4%) patients with complete data. Most patients 63,327 (35.6%) were 70-79 yr of age, and 98,513 (55.3%) were women. Multimorbidity was present in 38,384 patients (21.6%). QoL improved after surgery for 149,774 (84.1%) patients, remained unchanged for 10,219 (5.7%) patients, and became worse after surgery for 7289 (4.1%) patients. QoL changes were mixed (at least one QoL domain improved and at least one deteriorated) for 10,847 (6.1%) patients. Poor QoL outcomes (unchanged/mixed/worse) were more likely for patients with multimorbidity (OR 1.53 [1.49-1.58]).
Conclusions: Hip replacement surgery improves QoL. However, patients with multimorbidity are less likely to experience these benefits. Poor QoL outcomes became more frequent as the number of comorbid diseases increased. These data should inform shared decision-making conversations around joint replacement surgery.
背景:进行全髋关节置换手术是为了提高生活质量(QoL)。我们探讨了多病症与全髋关节置换术后 QoL 变化之间的关系:分析英国国家医疗服务系统(NHS)髋关节置换患者报告结果测量(PROMs)数据库中2013年4月至2018年3月期间具有完整术前、术后3至6个月EQ-5D QoL数据的患者。多病定义为两种或两种以上慢性疾病,但不包括关节炎。主要结局测量指标是采用帕累托健康变化分类法得出的 QoL 变化。我们使用多变量建模法比较了有多病症和无多病症患者的 QoL 变化。数据以几率比(OR)和 95% 置信区间或 n (%) 表示:在 216 191 名患者中,我们纳入了 178 129 名(82.4%)数据完整的患者。大多数患者的年龄在 70-79 岁之间,其中 63,327 人(35.6%)为女性,98,513 人(55.3%)为女性。38,384名患者(21.6%)患有多种疾病。149774 名患者(84.1%)的 QoL 在术后有所改善,10219 名患者(5.7%)的 QoL 保持不变,7289 名患者(4.1%)的 QoL 在术后有所恶化。10847名(6.1%)患者的 QoL 变化不一(至少一个 QoL 领域有所改善,至少一个领域有所恶化)。多重疾病患者的 QoL 结果较差(不变/混合/恶化)的可能性更大(OR 1.53 [1.49-1.58]):结论:髋关节置换手术可改善患者的生活质量。结论:髋关节置换手术可改善患者的 QoL,但患有多种疾病的患者获得这些益处的可能性较低。随着合并症的增加,QoL较差的情况也越来越常见。这些数据应为围绕关节置换手术的共同决策对话提供参考。
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) is a prestigious publication that covers a wide range of topics in anaesthesia, critical care medicine, pain medicine, and perioperative medicine. It aims to disseminate high-impact original research, spanning fundamental, translational, and clinical sciences, as well as clinical practice, technology, education, and training. Additionally, the journal features review articles, notable case reports, correspondence, and special articles that appeal to a broader audience.
The BJA is proudly associated with The Royal College of Anaesthetists, The College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland, and The Hong Kong College of Anaesthesiologists. This partnership provides members of these esteemed institutions with access to not only the BJA but also its sister publication, BJA Education. It is essential to note that both journals maintain their editorial independence.
Overall, the BJA offers a diverse and comprehensive platform for anaesthetists, critical care physicians, pain specialists, and perioperative medicine practitioners to contribute and stay updated with the latest advancements in their respective fields.