The Impact of Dexamethasone and Prednisone on Apixaban and Rivaroxaban Exposure in COVID-19 Patients: A Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling Study.

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Jean Terrier, Kenza Abouir, Frederic Gaspar, Youssef Daali, Caroline Flora Samer
{"title":"The Impact of Dexamethasone and Prednisone on Apixaban and Rivaroxaban Exposure in COVID-19 Patients: A Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling Study.","authors":"Jean Terrier, Kenza Abouir, Frederic Gaspar, Youssef Daali, Caroline Flora Samer","doi":"10.1002/cpt.3491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dexamethasone (DEX) is currently the treatment of choice for patients with oxygen-dependent COVID-19. It has been observed, primarily in vitro, that dexamethasone induces the expression of CYP3A and the ABCB1 gene, which encodes P-glycoprotein (P-gp). This has raised concerns about potential interactions between DEX and substrates of CYP3A and P-gp, such as direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC). Currently, there is limited robust evidence to support a clinically significant interaction between DEX and DOAC. Using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling (PBPK), we investigated the impact of DEX administered in the context of SARS-CoV-2 infection on the pharmacokinetics of apixaban (APX) and rivaroxaban (RVX). After validating the induction effect of the DEX compound on two CYP3A4 substrates using the limited available studies, we optimized the compound in a COVID-19 patient population, where significantly higher DEX plasma concentrations were observed compared to healthy volunteers. Our PBPK-based PK simulations showed a 20% decrease in the AUC of APX and RVX in a worst-case scenario and when DEX was administered at 6 mg PO for 10 days. This finding confirms the limited clinical data currently available and supports the use of APX and RVX with DEX in COVID-19 patients at low-risk for thrombo-embolism. In addition, our results suggest that prednisone (PRED), when used at an equipotent dose, could serve as a viable alternative to DEX, given its less pronounced induction effect on APX and RVX. Further research is needed to validate these findings and to explore the clinical implications of using PRED in place of DEX in such scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.3491","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dexamethasone (DEX) is currently the treatment of choice for patients with oxygen-dependent COVID-19. It has been observed, primarily in vitro, that dexamethasone induces the expression of CYP3A and the ABCB1 gene, which encodes P-glycoprotein (P-gp). This has raised concerns about potential interactions between DEX and substrates of CYP3A and P-gp, such as direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC). Currently, there is limited robust evidence to support a clinically significant interaction between DEX and DOAC. Using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling (PBPK), we investigated the impact of DEX administered in the context of SARS-CoV-2 infection on the pharmacokinetics of apixaban (APX) and rivaroxaban (RVX). After validating the induction effect of the DEX compound on two CYP3A4 substrates using the limited available studies, we optimized the compound in a COVID-19 patient population, where significantly higher DEX plasma concentrations were observed compared to healthy volunteers. Our PBPK-based PK simulations showed a 20% decrease in the AUC of APX and RVX in a worst-case scenario and when DEX was administered at 6 mg PO for 10 days. This finding confirms the limited clinical data currently available and supports the use of APX and RVX with DEX in COVID-19 patients at low-risk for thrombo-embolism. In addition, our results suggest that prednisone (PRED), when used at an equipotent dose, could serve as a viable alternative to DEX, given its less pronounced induction effect on APX and RVX. Further research is needed to validate these findings and to explore the clinical implications of using PRED in place of DEX in such scenarios.

地塞米松和泼尼松对 COVID-19 患者阿哌沙班和利伐沙班暴露的影响:基于生理学的药代动力学模型研究。
地塞米松(DEX)是目前治疗氧依赖性 COVID-19 患者的首选药物。据观察,地塞米松主要在体外诱导 CYP3A 和编码 P 糖蛋白(P-gp)的 ABCB1 基因的表达。这引起了人们对地塞米松与 CYP3A 和 P-gp 底物(如直接口服抗凝剂 (DOAC))之间潜在相互作用的担忧。目前,支持 DEX 与 DOAC 之间存在临床显著相互作用的有力证据有限。我们利用生理学药代动力学模型(PBPK)研究了在感染SARS-CoV-2时服用DEX对阿哌沙班(APX)和利伐沙班(RVX)药代动力学的影响。在利用有限的现有研究验证了 DEX 复合物对两种 CYP3A4 底物的诱导作用后,我们在 COVID-19 患者群体中对该复合物进行了优化,观察到 DEX 的血浆浓度明显高于健康志愿者。我们基于 PBPK 的 PK 模拟显示,在最坏的情况下,DEX 的 AUC 和 RVX 降低了 20%,并且以 6 毫克 PO 持续给药 10 天。这一结果证实了目前有限的临床数据,并支持在血栓栓塞低风险的 COVID-19 患者中使用 APX 和 RVX 与 DEX。此外,我们的研究结果表明,泼尼松(PRED)对 APX 和 RVX 的诱导作用不明显,因此在使用同等剂量时可作为 DEX 的可行替代品。还需要进一步的研究来验证这些发现,并探讨在这种情况下使用 PRED 替代 DEX 的临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.50%
发文量
290
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (CPT) is the authoritative cross-disciplinary journal in experimental and clinical medicine devoted to publishing advances in the nature, action, efficacy, and evaluation of therapeutics. CPT welcomes original Articles in the emerging areas of translational, predictive and personalized medicine; new therapeutic modalities including gene and cell therapies; pharmacogenomics, proteomics and metabolomics; bioinformation and applied systems biology complementing areas of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, human investigation and clinical trials, pharmacovigilence, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacometrics, and population pharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信