{"title":"UNIQUE: A Framework for Uncertainty Quantification Benchmarking.","authors":"Jessica Lanini, Minh Tam Davide Huynh, Gaetano Scebba, Nadine Schneider, Raquel Rodríguez-Pérez","doi":"10.1021/acs.jcim.4c01578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Machine learning (ML) models have become key in decision-making for many disciplines, including drug discovery and medicinal chemistry. ML models are generally evaluated prior to their usage in high-stakes decisions, such as compound synthesis or experimental testing. However, no ML model is robust or predictive in all real-world scenarios. Therefore, uncertainty quantification (UQ) in ML predictions has gained importance in recent years. Many investigations have focused on developing methodologies that provide accurate uncertainty estimates for ML-based predictions. Unfortunately, there is no UQ strategy that consistently provides robust estimates about model's applicability on new samples. Depending on the dataset, prediction task, and algorithm, accurate uncertainty estimations might be unfeasible to obtain. Moreover, the optimum UQ metric also varies across applications, and previous investigations have shown a lack of consistency across benchmarks. Herein, the UNIQUE (UNcertaInty QUantification bEnchmarking) framework is introduced to facilitate a comparison of UQ strategies in ML-based predictions. This Python library unifies the benchmarking of multiple UQ metrics, including the calculation of nonstandard UQ metrics (combining information from the dataset and model), and provides a comprehensive evaluation. In this framework, UQ metrics are evaluated for different application scenarios, e.g., eliminating the predictions with the lowest confidence or obtaining a reliable uncertainty estimate for an acquisition function. Taken together, this library will help to standardize UQ investigations and evaluate new methodologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":44,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling ","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling ","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.4c01578","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) models have become key in decision-making for many disciplines, including drug discovery and medicinal chemistry. ML models are generally evaluated prior to their usage in high-stakes decisions, such as compound synthesis or experimental testing. However, no ML model is robust or predictive in all real-world scenarios. Therefore, uncertainty quantification (UQ) in ML predictions has gained importance in recent years. Many investigations have focused on developing methodologies that provide accurate uncertainty estimates for ML-based predictions. Unfortunately, there is no UQ strategy that consistently provides robust estimates about model's applicability on new samples. Depending on the dataset, prediction task, and algorithm, accurate uncertainty estimations might be unfeasible to obtain. Moreover, the optimum UQ metric also varies across applications, and previous investigations have shown a lack of consistency across benchmarks. Herein, the UNIQUE (UNcertaInty QUantification bEnchmarking) framework is introduced to facilitate a comparison of UQ strategies in ML-based predictions. This Python library unifies the benchmarking of multiple UQ metrics, including the calculation of nonstandard UQ metrics (combining information from the dataset and model), and provides a comprehensive evaluation. In this framework, UQ metrics are evaluated for different application scenarios, e.g., eliminating the predictions with the lowest confidence or obtaining a reliable uncertainty estimate for an acquisition function. Taken together, this library will help to standardize UQ investigations and evaluate new methodologies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling publishes papers reporting new methodology and/or important applications in the fields of chemical informatics and molecular modeling. Specific topics include the representation and computer-based searching of chemical databases, molecular modeling, computer-aided molecular design of new materials, catalysts, or ligands, development of new computational methods or efficient algorithms for chemical software, and biopharmaceutical chemistry including analyses of biological activity and other issues related to drug discovery.
Astute chemists, computer scientists, and information specialists look to this monthly’s insightful research studies, programming innovations, and software reviews to keep current with advances in this integral, multidisciplinary field.
As a subscriber you’ll stay abreast of database search systems, use of graph theory in chemical problems, substructure search systems, pattern recognition and clustering, analysis of chemical and physical data, molecular modeling, graphics and natural language interfaces, bibliometric and citation analysis, and synthesis design and reactions databases.