Incidence of new, non-physiologic maternal findings on fetal magnetic resonance imaging.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Shirley J Shao, Andrew Grimes, Marley Rashad, Liina Poder, Dorothy Shum, Nasim Camillia Sobhani
{"title":"Incidence of new, non-physiologic maternal findings on fetal magnetic resonance imaging.","authors":"Shirley J Shao, Andrew Grimes, Marley Rashad, Liina Poder, Dorothy Shum, Nasim Camillia Sobhani","doi":"10.1055/a-2466-1319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used for evaluation of fetal anomalies, and rates of incidental maternal findings are not well characterized. Our objective was to evaluate the rate of incidental maternal findings at the time of antenatal MRI performed for fetal indications.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study that included all fetal MRIs performed between 2018-2023 at a single tertiary care institution with a multidisciplinary fetal diagnosis and treatment center. The electronic medical record was reviewed to identify all documented maternal findings and any new, non-physiologic maternal findings. The latter was defined as previously unknown abnormalities of maternal structures unrelated to normal physiology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study included 834 imaging events, performed at an average gestational age of 23 weeks. The most common indication for imaging was fetal anomaly (81.1%). The most common imaging type was fetal brain MRI (81.4%). Overall, 16.2% reported a maternal finding and 7% reported a new, non-physiologic finding. The most common new, non-physiologic findings were renal cysts (n=11), liver cysts (n=6), and gallstones or gallbladder sludge (n=5). Compared to imaging events that included a fetal brain MRI, imaging events that included a fetal body MRI had a significantly higher rate of any maternal findings (53.0% vs 10.4%, p< 0.001) and new, non-physiologic maternal findings (26.9% vs 3.7%, p< 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that the risk of identifying new, non-physiologic maternal findings on fetal MRI is low. The rate of any maternal and new, non-physiologic maternal findings may differ by fetal MRI type due to differences in imaging depth and extent of radiology subspecialist review. These data should be incorporated into pre-test counseling for patients planning to have fetal MRI.</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2466-1319","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used for evaluation of fetal anomalies, and rates of incidental maternal findings are not well characterized. Our objective was to evaluate the rate of incidental maternal findings at the time of antenatal MRI performed for fetal indications.

Study design: This was a retrospective cohort study that included all fetal MRIs performed between 2018-2023 at a single tertiary care institution with a multidisciplinary fetal diagnosis and treatment center. The electronic medical record was reviewed to identify all documented maternal findings and any new, non-physiologic maternal findings. The latter was defined as previously unknown abnormalities of maternal structures unrelated to normal physiology.

Results: Our study included 834 imaging events, performed at an average gestational age of 23 weeks. The most common indication for imaging was fetal anomaly (81.1%). The most common imaging type was fetal brain MRI (81.4%). Overall, 16.2% reported a maternal finding and 7% reported a new, non-physiologic finding. The most common new, non-physiologic findings were renal cysts (n=11), liver cysts (n=6), and gallstones or gallbladder sludge (n=5). Compared to imaging events that included a fetal brain MRI, imaging events that included a fetal body MRI had a significantly higher rate of any maternal findings (53.0% vs 10.4%, p< 0.001) and new, non-physiologic maternal findings (26.9% vs 3.7%, p< 0.001).

Conclusion: Our results suggest that the risk of identifying new, non-physiologic maternal findings on fetal MRI is low. The rate of any maternal and new, non-physiologic maternal findings may differ by fetal MRI type due to differences in imaging depth and extent of radiology subspecialist review. These data should be incorporated into pre-test counseling for patients planning to have fetal MRI.

胎儿磁共振成像中母体非生理性新发现的发生率。
目的:胎儿磁共振成像(MRI)越来越多地用于评估胎儿畸形,而母体偶然发现的比例却没有得到很好的描述。我们的目的是评估因胎儿适应症而进行产前磁共振成像时母体意外发现的比率:这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了一家拥有多学科胎儿诊断和治疗中心的三级医疗机构在 2018-2023 年期间进行的所有胎儿 MRI。研究人员查阅了电子病历,以确定所有记录在案的母体检查结果以及任何新的、非生理性的母体检查结果。后者被定义为与正常生理无关的先前未知的母体结构异常:我们的研究包括 834 例造影,平均孕周为 23 周。最常见的造影适应症是胎儿异常(81.1%)。最常见的成像类型是胎儿脑部磁共振成像(81.4%)。总体而言,16.2%报告了母体发现,7%报告了新的非生理学发现。最常见的非生理性新发现是肾囊肿(11 例)、肝囊肿(6 例)和胆结石或胆囊淤血(5 例)。与包括胎儿脑部核磁共振成像的造影事件相比,包括胎儿身体核磁共振成像的造影事件的任何母体发现率(53.0% vs 10.4%,P< 0.001)和新的非生理性母体发现率(26.9% vs 3.7%,P< 0.001)都明显更高:我们的结果表明,在胎儿磁共振成像中发现新的、非生理性母体发现的风险很低。由于成像深度和放射学亚专科审查范围的差异,不同类型胎儿磁共振成像的任何母体和新的、非生理性母体发现率可能不同。这些数据应纳入计划进行胎儿核磁共振成像检查的患者的检查前咨询中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信