Evaluation of New Mental Health Diagnoses After Pediatric Traumatic Injuries at a Level 1 Pediatric Trauma Center.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Marshall W Wallace, Stephanie E Iantorno, Zachary J Moore, Bryan Tate Colton, Brooks Keeshin, Robert A Swendiman, Katie W Russell
{"title":"Evaluation of New Mental Health Diagnoses After Pediatric Traumatic Injuries at a Level 1 Pediatric Trauma Center.","authors":"Marshall W Wallace, Stephanie E Iantorno, Zachary J Moore, Bryan Tate Colton, Brooks Keeshin, Robert A Swendiman, Katie W Russell","doi":"10.1177/00031348241300358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traumatic injury is associated with significant mental health morbidity. To evaluate the need for implementation of active-post injury mental health screening at a Level 1 Pediatric Trauma center, we aimed to characterize all new mental health diagnoses after injury and evaluated for patient or injury factors that may aid in targeting of future screening.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective analysis of trauma patients aged 6-18 years presenting in 2022 was performed. Our primary outcome was a new DSM-5 mental health diagnosis documented after traumatic injury. Patients with and without a new mental health diagnosis were compared by age, sex, race, ethnicity, injury type/mechanism, injury severity score (ISS), intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and length of stay (LOS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>492 patients were included. Their median (IQR) age was 13.5 (10.4, 15.4) years. The median (IQR) follow-up interval was 157 (9, 429) days. There were 24 (4.9%) children with a new mental health diagnosis: 12 (50%) with trauma-related stress disorders, with the remaining having diagnoses such as depressive or anxiety disorders. Patients with a new mental health diagnosis had longer LOS (3.0 [1.8, 7.5] vs 2.0 [1.0, 3.3] days, <i>P</i> = 0.02) and were more likely to have sustained penetrating injury (<i>P</i> = 0.01). There were no differences in demographics, rates of preexisting mental health diagnosis or area deprivation index (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>There were fewer new mental health diagnoses in our cohort than expected, likely underestimating the acute need. Comprehensive post-injury screening is imperative to sufficiently identify and intervene upon mental health morbidity after pediatric trauma.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348241300358","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Traumatic injury is associated with significant mental health morbidity. To evaluate the need for implementation of active-post injury mental health screening at a Level 1 Pediatric Trauma center, we aimed to characterize all new mental health diagnoses after injury and evaluated for patient or injury factors that may aid in targeting of future screening.

Methods: A single-center retrospective analysis of trauma patients aged 6-18 years presenting in 2022 was performed. Our primary outcome was a new DSM-5 mental health diagnosis documented after traumatic injury. Patients with and without a new mental health diagnosis were compared by age, sex, race, ethnicity, injury type/mechanism, injury severity score (ISS), intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and length of stay (LOS).

Results: 492 patients were included. Their median (IQR) age was 13.5 (10.4, 15.4) years. The median (IQR) follow-up interval was 157 (9, 429) days. There were 24 (4.9%) children with a new mental health diagnosis: 12 (50%) with trauma-related stress disorders, with the remaining having diagnoses such as depressive or anxiety disorders. Patients with a new mental health diagnosis had longer LOS (3.0 [1.8, 7.5] vs 2.0 [1.0, 3.3] days, P = 0.02) and were more likely to have sustained penetrating injury (P = 0.01). There were no differences in demographics, rates of preexisting mental health diagnosis or area deprivation index (P > 0.05).

Discussion: There were fewer new mental health diagnoses in our cohort than expected, likely underestimating the acute need. Comprehensive post-injury screening is imperative to sufficiently identify and intervene upon mental health morbidity after pediatric trauma.

一级儿科创伤中心对儿科创伤后新心理健康诊断的评估。
背景:创伤与严重的心理健康发病率有关。为了评估在一级儿科创伤中心实施积极的伤后心理健康筛查的必要性,我们旨在描述伤后所有新的心理健康诊断的特征,并评估可能有助于确定未来筛查目标的患者或损伤因素:我们对 2022 年就诊的 6-18 岁创伤患者进行了单中心回顾性分析。我们的主要结果是创伤后记录的新的 DSM-5 精神健康诊断。我们按照年龄、性别、种族、民族、受伤类型/机制、受伤严重程度评分(ISS)、重症监护室(ICU)入院情况和住院时间(LOS)对有和没有新精神健康诊断的患者进行了比较:结果:共纳入 492 名患者。结果:共纳入 492 名患者,他们的中位(IQR)年龄为 13.5(10.4,15.4)岁。随访间隔中位数(IQR)为 157(9,429)天。有 24 名儿童(4.9%)被诊断出患有新的精神疾病:其中 12 名(50%)患有与创伤相关的应激障碍,其余的被诊断出患有抑郁症或焦虑症。有新精神健康诊断的患者的住院时间更长(3.0 [1.8, 7.5] 天 vs 2.0 [1.0, 3.3] 天,P = 0.02),更有可能受到穿透性损伤(P = 0.01)。在人口统计学、既往精神健康诊断率或地区贫困指数方面没有差异(P > 0.05):讨论:在我们的队列中,新的精神健康诊断比预期的要少,这很可能低估了急性需求。全面的伤后筛查对于充分识别和干预儿科创伤后的心理健康发病率至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Surgeon
American Surgeon 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
623
期刊介绍: The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信