A Survival Analysis of Rural-Urban Disparities in COVID-19 Vaccination Uptake in the United States.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Biplab Kumar Datta, Jennifer E Jaremski, Benjamin E Ansa, Lorriane Odhiambo, Catherine Clary, K M Monirul Islam, J Aaron Johnson
{"title":"A Survival Analysis of Rural-Urban Disparities in COVID-19 Vaccination Uptake in the United States.","authors":"Biplab Kumar Datta, Jennifer E Jaremski, Benjamin E Ansa, Lorriane Odhiambo, Catherine Clary, K M Monirul Islam, J Aaron Johnson","doi":"10.1177/08901171241300136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Though urban-rural disparities in COVID-19 vaccination coverage was documented at a point of time, little is known on the evolution of vaccination uptake over time. This study, using individual level time-to-event data, intend to assess the differences in monthly progression of vaccination uptake among U.S. adults by urban/rural residence.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Survival analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Urban and rural areas in 29 U.S. states.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>135,969 adults aged 18+ years.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>Time (in months) to receive the first dose of COVID-19 vaccine since the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Emergency Use Authorization of Pfizer-BioNTech- and Moderna- COVID-19 Vaccine in December 2020.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>Kaplan-Meier survivor functions and stratified Cox proportional hazard models were estimated for the event of being vaccinated by urban/rural residence for 25 months starting from December 2020. Monthly survival probabilities for urban- and rural- adults were further assessed within certain demographic and socioeconomic groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found a gradual divergence of COVID-19 vaccination uptake in favor of urban adults, which was robust across sex, age groups, race and ethnicity, education, and income levels. In April 2021, after vaccine eligibility was expanded, 42.2% adults in urban and 53.3% adults in rural areas were unvaccinated. While only 19.3% urban adults remained unvaccinated in December 2022, this rate was 32.5% among rural adults. Compared to their urban counterparts, rural adults were 0.77 (95% CI: 0.76 - 0.79) times as likely to receive the first dose of COVID-19 vaccine.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Time-to-event analysis of vaccination against COVID-19 indicated a lower uptake among rural adults, which was persistent across different demographic and socioeconomic groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"8901171241300136"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171241300136","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Though urban-rural disparities in COVID-19 vaccination coverage was documented at a point of time, little is known on the evolution of vaccination uptake over time. This study, using individual level time-to-event data, intend to assess the differences in monthly progression of vaccination uptake among U.S. adults by urban/rural residence.

Design: Survival analysis.

Setting: Urban and rural areas in 29 U.S. states.

Subjects: 135,969 adults aged 18+ years.

Measures: Time (in months) to receive the first dose of COVID-19 vaccine since the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Emergency Use Authorization of Pfizer-BioNTech- and Moderna- COVID-19 Vaccine in December 2020.

Analysis: Kaplan-Meier survivor functions and stratified Cox proportional hazard models were estimated for the event of being vaccinated by urban/rural residence for 25 months starting from December 2020. Monthly survival probabilities for urban- and rural- adults were further assessed within certain demographic and socioeconomic groups.

Results: We found a gradual divergence of COVID-19 vaccination uptake in favor of urban adults, which was robust across sex, age groups, race and ethnicity, education, and income levels. In April 2021, after vaccine eligibility was expanded, 42.2% adults in urban and 53.3% adults in rural areas were unvaccinated. While only 19.3% urban adults remained unvaccinated in December 2022, this rate was 32.5% among rural adults. Compared to their urban counterparts, rural adults were 0.77 (95% CI: 0.76 - 0.79) times as likely to receive the first dose of COVID-19 vaccine.

Conclusions: Time-to-event analysis of vaccination against COVID-19 indicated a lower uptake among rural adults, which was persistent across different demographic and socioeconomic groups.

美国 COVID-19 疫苗接种率城乡差异的生存分析。
目的:虽然在某个时间点上记录了 COVID-19 疫苗接种覆盖率的城乡差异,但人们对疫苗接种率随时间的变化知之甚少。本研究使用个人层面的时间到事件数据,旨在评估美国成年人每月接种疫苗的进展在城市/农村居住地之间的差异:设计:生存分析:背景:美国 29 个州的城市和农村地区:135969名18岁以上的成年人:自 2020 年 12 月美国食品和药物管理局 (FDA) 批准辉瑞生物技术公司和 Moderna 公司的 COVID-19 疫苗紧急使用以来,接种第一剂 COVID-19 疫苗的时间(以月为单位):从2020年12月起的25个月内,按城市/农村居住地估算接种疫苗事件的卡普兰-梅耶生存函数和分层考克斯比例危险模型。我们还进一步评估了某些人口和社会经济群体中城市和农村成年人的月生存概率:结果:我们发现,COVID-19 疫苗的接种率逐渐向城市成人倾斜,这一点在不同性别、年龄组、种族和民族、教育程度以及收入水平的人群中都很明显。2021 年 4 月,疫苗接种资格扩大后,42.2% 的城市成年人和 53.3% 的农村成年人未接种疫苗。2022 年 12 月,仅有 19.3% 的城市成年人仍未接种疫苗,而农村成年人的这一比例为 32.5%。与城市成年人相比,农村成年人接种第一剂COVID-19疫苗的可能性是城市成年人的0.77倍(95% CI:0.76 - 0.79):结论:对COVID-19疫苗接种情况进行的时间到事件分析表明,农村成年人的接种率较低,这种情况在不同的人口和社会经济群体中持续存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Health Promotion
American Journal of Health Promotion PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The editorial goal of the American Journal of Health Promotion is to provide a forum for exchange among the many disciplines involved in health promotion and an interface between researchers and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信