Comparison of the effectiveness of subcostal transversus abdominis plane and rectus sheath blocks in postoperative analgesia in major open gynecological cancer surgeries: a prospective randomized study.

Anesthesia and pain medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-25 DOI:10.17085/apm.24086
Duygu Akyol, Funda Gümüş Özcan
{"title":"Comparison of the effectiveness of subcostal transversus abdominis plane and rectus sheath blocks in postoperative analgesia in major open gynecological cancer surgeries: a prospective randomized study.","authors":"Duygu Akyol, Funda Gümüş Özcan","doi":"10.17085/apm.24086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) is frequently used for postoperative analgesia in abdominal surgery. However, it remains insufficient for analgesia during upper abdominal surgeries. Therefore, we compared the efficacy of the subcostal transversus abdominis plane block (STAPB) or rectus sheath block (RSB), in addition to the posterior transversus abdominis plane block (PTAPB), for postoperative analgesia in major gynecologic cancer surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective randomized study included 50 patients aged > 18 years (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status II or III), who underwent gynecologic cancer surgery through a midline incision. All patients underwent PTAPB, STAPB, or RSB according to the randomization. The following parameters were recorded and compared: demographic data; intraoperative hemodynamic parameters; numeric rating scale (NRS) pain levels at the 1st, 6th, 12th, and 24th postoperative hours; opioid consumption; number of requests and boluses; adverse effects; surgical complications within 24 h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-seven patients were included in this study. In the STAPB group, postoperative 1, 12 and 24 h NRS values were lower; opioid consumption, opioid demand, and bolus numbers were lower during the postoperative 24 h as compared to RSB (P < 0.05). The intraoperative opioid and hemodynamic values were similar in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>STAPB in addition to PTAPB provides more effective analgesia than RSB for postoperative pain management in open gynecologic cancer surgeries.</p>","PeriodicalId":101360,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","volume":"19 4","pages":"353-361"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11558053/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.24086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) is frequently used for postoperative analgesia in abdominal surgery. However, it remains insufficient for analgesia during upper abdominal surgeries. Therefore, we compared the efficacy of the subcostal transversus abdominis plane block (STAPB) or rectus sheath block (RSB), in addition to the posterior transversus abdominis plane block (PTAPB), for postoperative analgesia in major gynecologic cancer surgeries.

Methods: This prospective randomized study included 50 patients aged > 18 years (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status II or III), who underwent gynecologic cancer surgery through a midline incision. All patients underwent PTAPB, STAPB, or RSB according to the randomization. The following parameters were recorded and compared: demographic data; intraoperative hemodynamic parameters; numeric rating scale (NRS) pain levels at the 1st, 6th, 12th, and 24th postoperative hours; opioid consumption; number of requests and boluses; adverse effects; surgical complications within 24 h.

Results: Forty-seven patients were included in this study. In the STAPB group, postoperative 1, 12 and 24 h NRS values were lower; opioid consumption, opioid demand, and bolus numbers were lower during the postoperative 24 h as compared to RSB (P < 0.05). The intraoperative opioid and hemodynamic values were similar in both groups.

Conclusions: STAPB in addition to PTAPB provides more effective analgesia than RSB for postoperative pain management in open gynecologic cancer surgeries.

比较肋下腹横肌平面和直肠鞘阻滞在大型开放式妇科癌症手术术后镇痛中的效果:一项前瞻性随机研究。
背景:腹横肌平面阻滞(TAPB)常用于腹部手术的术后镇痛。然而,它仍不足以用于上腹部手术的镇痛。因此,我们比较了除后腹横肌平面阻滞(PTAPB)外,肋下腹横肌平面阻滞(STAPB)或直肌鞘阻滞(RSB)在大型妇科癌症手术术后镇痛中的疗效:这项前瞻性随机研究纳入了 50 名年龄大于 18 岁(美国麻醉医师协会身体状况 II 级或 III 级)、经中线切口接受妇科癌症手术的患者。所有患者均根据随机分配接受了 PTAPB、STAPB 或 RSB。记录并比较了以下参数:人口统计学数据;术中血流动力学参数;术后第1、6、12和24小时的数字评分量表(NRS)疼痛水平;阿片类药物消耗量;请求和栓注次数;不良反应;24小时内的手术并发症:本研究共纳入 47 名患者。STAPB 组与 RSB 组相比,术后 1、12 和 24 小时的 NRS 值更低;术后 24 小时的阿片类药物消耗量、阿片类药物需求量和栓剂数量更少(P < 0.05)。两组术中阿片类药物和血液动力学值相似:结论:在开放性妇科癌症手术的术后疼痛治疗中,STAPB 和 PTAPB 比 RSB 能提供更有效的镇痛效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信