Census growth and challenges of a novel Hospital at Home program: A retrospective cohort study.

Stephen T Biederman, Julia S Breton, Gordon M Pace, Alan W Dow
{"title":"Census growth and challenges of a novel Hospital at Home program: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Stephen T Biederman, Julia S Breton, Gordon M Pace, Alan W Dow","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospital at Home (HaH) is a growing care model requiring significant investments. Critical to starting a program is estimating census and enrollments. The objective of this study was to compare expected versus actual consults, enrollments, and barriers in a novel HaH program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an observational, retrospective cohort study at a single urban academic medical center. Adult inpatients considered for enrollment to HaH were included. Demographic data, diagnoses and outcomes data were extracted for HaH patients. Volume and outcomes of HaH consults were recorded, including reasons for ineligibility or a patient declining to enroll.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the first year of implementation, 248 patients enrolled. The average daily census (ADC) grew over months 1-6, then plateaued at a mean of 4.4 patients during month 10, with an overall ADC range from 0 to 7 patients. From months 7 to 12, there were 724 consults for a home hospital assessment, of which 22.5% (163/724) of patients were enrolled, 21.8% (158/724) declined to enroll, 29.3% (212/724) were ineligible for the program, and 26.4% (191/724) had consults that were deferred until the time of discharge and never explicitly consented or refused. The most common reasons for program ineligibility were complex care needs, insurance status, and not meeting inpatient status. The most common reasons patients declined to enroll were a preference to remain in the brick-and-mortar hospital and home conditions not suitable for HaH.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This retrospective, cohort study defines the challenges of enrolling patients in an HaH program and provides areas for other programs to examine as they start or grow a program.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hospital at Home (HaH) is a growing care model requiring significant investments. Critical to starting a program is estimating census and enrollments. The objective of this study was to compare expected versus actual consults, enrollments, and barriers in a novel HaH program.

Methods: This was an observational, retrospective cohort study at a single urban academic medical center. Adult inpatients considered for enrollment to HaH were included. Demographic data, diagnoses and outcomes data were extracted for HaH patients. Volume and outcomes of HaH consults were recorded, including reasons for ineligibility or a patient declining to enroll.

Results: Over the first year of implementation, 248 patients enrolled. The average daily census (ADC) grew over months 1-6, then plateaued at a mean of 4.4 patients during month 10, with an overall ADC range from 0 to 7 patients. From months 7 to 12, there were 724 consults for a home hospital assessment, of which 22.5% (163/724) of patients were enrolled, 21.8% (158/724) declined to enroll, 29.3% (212/724) were ineligible for the program, and 26.4% (191/724) had consults that were deferred until the time of discharge and never explicitly consented or refused. The most common reasons for program ineligibility were complex care needs, insurance status, and not meeting inpatient status. The most common reasons patients declined to enroll were a preference to remain in the brick-and-mortar hospital and home conditions not suitable for HaH.

Conclusions: This retrospective, cohort study defines the challenges of enrolling patients in an HaH program and provides areas for other programs to examine as they start or grow a program.

一项新颖的 "医院在家 "计划的普查增长与挑战:回顾性队列研究
背景:居家医院(HaH)是一种不断发展的医疗模式,需要大量投资。启动一项计划的关键在于估算人口普查和注册人数。本研究的目的是比较一项新颖的 "HaH "计划的预期与实际咨询量、注册人数和障碍:方法:这是一项观察性、回顾性队列研究,在一个城市学术医疗中心进行。研究对象包括考虑加入 HaH 的成人住院患者。研究提取了HaH患者的人口统计学数据、诊断和结果数据。记录了HaH会诊的数量和结果,包括不符合条件或患者拒绝加入的原因:在实施的第一年中,共有 248 名患者注册。在第 1-6 个月中,平均每日就诊人数(ADC)有所增长,然后在第 10 个月稳定在平均 4.4 名患者的水平,总体 ADC 范围在 0 到 7 名患者之间。从第 7 个月到第 12 个月,共有 724 名患者咨询了家庭医院评估,其中 22.5% 的患者(163/724)加入了该计划,21.8% 的患者(158/724)拒绝加入,29.3% 的患者(212/724)不符合该计划的条件,26.4% 的患者(191/724)的咨询被推迟到出院时进行,并且从未明确表示同意或拒绝。不符合计划资格的最常见原因是复杂的护理需求、保险状况和不符合住院条件。患者拒绝加入的最常见原因是倾向于留在实体医院,以及家庭条件不适合哈医大一院:这项回顾性队列研究明确了患者加入 HaH 计划所面临的挑战,并为其他计划的启动或发展提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信