Ken Kondo, Siyeong Kim, Naoto Noguchi, Ryoto Akiyama, Waka Murata, Bumsuk Lee
{"title":"Learning program enhances rehabilitation professionals' perceived ease of using 3d printing: a pilot randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Ken Kondo, Siyeong Kim, Naoto Noguchi, Ryoto Akiyama, Waka Murata, Bumsuk Lee","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2024.2424881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The pilot study evaluated whether a learning program enhances a positive perception of 3D printing technology in rehabilitation professionals. Physical therapists, occupational therapists and speech-language-hearing therapists were recruited from a rehabilitation department in a middle-sized hospital. Participants were randomized to the control group (<i>n</i> = 13) or the intervention group (<i>n</i> = 14). An eight-week learning program consisted of a lecture on using a 3D printer and related software, a group discussion to integrate 3D printing into their clinical practices, and the implementation in their workplace. Outcome measures included the perception of 3D printing technology assessed by the Japanese version of the modified Technology Acceptance Model questionnaire for 3D printing technology (TAM-J). Assessment time points were pre-and post-intervention. As a result, all participants in the intervention group became capable of producing 3D-printed customized assistive devices. In the within-group analyses, the intervention group showed significant improvements in the TAM-J perception ease of use score (<i>p</i> = 0.012) with a large effect size (<i>r</i> = 0.75). Between-group analyses showed that the intervention group gained an additional improvement in the TAM-J perception ease of use score (<i>p</i> = 0.027) with a moderate effect size (<i>r</i> = 0. 43), indicating a significant improvement in the perceived ease of use of 3D printing technology in the intervention group. These observations suggest the 3D printing learning program could provide rehabilitation professionals with a positive perception of the technical aspect of 3D printing in their workplace.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2024.2424881","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The pilot study evaluated whether a learning program enhances a positive perception of 3D printing technology in rehabilitation professionals. Physical therapists, occupational therapists and speech-language-hearing therapists were recruited from a rehabilitation department in a middle-sized hospital. Participants were randomized to the control group (n = 13) or the intervention group (n = 14). An eight-week learning program consisted of a lecture on using a 3D printer and related software, a group discussion to integrate 3D printing into their clinical practices, and the implementation in their workplace. Outcome measures included the perception of 3D printing technology assessed by the Japanese version of the modified Technology Acceptance Model questionnaire for 3D printing technology (TAM-J). Assessment time points were pre-and post-intervention. As a result, all participants in the intervention group became capable of producing 3D-printed customized assistive devices. In the within-group analyses, the intervention group showed significant improvements in the TAM-J perception ease of use score (p = 0.012) with a large effect size (r = 0.75). Between-group analyses showed that the intervention group gained an additional improvement in the TAM-J perception ease of use score (p = 0.027) with a moderate effect size (r = 0. 43), indicating a significant improvement in the perceived ease of use of 3D printing technology in the intervention group. These observations suggest the 3D printing learning program could provide rehabilitation professionals with a positive perception of the technical aspect of 3D printing in their workplace.
该试点研究评估了学习计划是否能增强康复专业人员对 3D 打印技术的积极看法。研究人员从一家中型医院的康复科招募了物理治疗师、职业治疗师和语言听力治疗师。参与者被随机分配到对照组(13 人)或干预组(14 人)。为期八周的学习计划包括使用 3D 打印机和相关软件的讲座、将 3D 打印融入临床实践的小组讨论以及在工作场所的实施。结果测量包括对 3D 打印技术的感知,评估采用日文版 3D 打印技术接受度模型问卷(TAM-J)。评估时间点为干预前和干预后。结果,干预组的所有参与者都能制作出定制的 3D 打印辅助设备。在组内分析中,干预组在 TAM-J 感知易用性得分上有显著改善(p = 0.012),且效应大小较大(r = 0.75)。组间分析表明,干预组在 TAM-J 感知易用性得分(p = 0.027)方面获得了额外的改善,效应大小适中(r = 0. 43),表明干预组在 3D 打印技术的感知易用性方面有了明显改善。这些观察结果表明,3D 打印学习计划可使康复专业人员对其工作场所中的 3D 打印技术方面产生积极的认知。