Qualitative Evaluation of Incorporating Ultrasound Education Into an Undergraduate Medical Education Clinical Human Anatomy Course.

Jared R Muench, Michael A Schellpfeffer
{"title":"Qualitative Evaluation of Incorporating Ultrasound Education Into an Undergraduate Medical Education Clinical Human Anatomy Course.","authors":"Jared R Muench, Michael A Schellpfeffer","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ultrasound use as a procedural guide and diagnostic tool has led many to herald it as the \"new stethoscope.\" Thus, medical schools are seeking to integrate ultrasound training into their longitudinal curricula. While various methods have been trialed, incorporating ultrasound into basic science courses as a supplementary learning tool often offers students their first exposure. This study seeks to identify factors that affected student excitement and perceived value of ultrasound training as part of an anatomy course.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A brief survey was distributed to first-year medical students after completing ultrasound education in a clinical human anatomy course. This survey gauged student excitement and perceived value of the ultrasound sessions. Through free-response, students expounded on factors that affected their ratings. Qualitative student feedback was organized, coded, and associated with student excitement and perceived value ratings using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses were returned from 26.2% of the surveyed group. Ten and 6 themes were identified in response to students' excitement and perceived value ratings of the sessions, respectively. Clinical relevance/utility was identified consistently as the most influential factor affecting student engagement. In addition, students' personal motivation and incentive, as well as the structure and learning environment of the sessions, were found to impact student engagement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We identified multiple factors that may impact student engagement with ultrasound sessions that are included as part of an anatomy course. Medical schools seeking to incorporate ultrasound sessions in a similar fashion could consider these factors when designing their own curricula.</p>","PeriodicalId":94268,"journal":{"name":"WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin","volume":"123 5","pages":"361-367"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Ultrasound use as a procedural guide and diagnostic tool has led many to herald it as the "new stethoscope." Thus, medical schools are seeking to integrate ultrasound training into their longitudinal curricula. While various methods have been trialed, incorporating ultrasound into basic science courses as a supplementary learning tool often offers students their first exposure. This study seeks to identify factors that affected student excitement and perceived value of ultrasound training as part of an anatomy course.

Materials and methods: A brief survey was distributed to first-year medical students after completing ultrasound education in a clinical human anatomy course. This survey gauged student excitement and perceived value of the ultrasound sessions. Through free-response, students expounded on factors that affected their ratings. Qualitative student feedback was organized, coded, and associated with student excitement and perceived value ratings using thematic analysis.

Results: Responses were returned from 26.2% of the surveyed group. Ten and 6 themes were identified in response to students' excitement and perceived value ratings of the sessions, respectively. Clinical relevance/utility was identified consistently as the most influential factor affecting student engagement. In addition, students' personal motivation and incentive, as well as the structure and learning environment of the sessions, were found to impact student engagement.

Conclusions: We identified multiple factors that may impact student engagement with ultrasound sessions that are included as part of an anatomy course. Medical schools seeking to incorporate ultrasound sessions in a similar fashion could consider these factors when designing their own curricula.

将超声波教育纳入本科医学教育临床人体解剖学课程的定性评估。
导言:超声波作为一种程序指导和诊断工具,被许多人誉为 "新的听诊器"。因此,医学院正努力将超声波培训纳入其纵向课程。虽然已经尝试了多种方法,但将超声波作为辅助学习工具纳入基础科学课程,往往是学生们第一次接触超声波。本研究试图找出影响学生对作为解剖学课程一部分的超声波培训的兴奋程度和感知价值的因素:在临床人体解剖学课程中完成超声波教育后,我们向一年级医学生发放了一份简短的调查问卷。该调查衡量了学生对超声课程的兴奋程度和感知价值。通过自由回答,学生们阐述了影响其评价的因素。对学生的定性反馈进行了整理、编码,并通过主题分析将其与学生的兴奋度和感知价值评分联系起来:结果:26.2%的受访学生反馈了意见。根据学生对课程的兴奋度和感知价值评级,分别确定了 10 个和 6 个主题。临床相关性/实用性一直被认为是影响学生参与度的最有影响力的因素。此外,学生的个人动机和积极性以及课程的结构和学习环境也会影响学生的参与度:我们发现了可能影响学生参与作为解剖课程一部分的超声课程的多种因素。医学院在设计自己的课程时,如果希望以类似的方式纳入超声课程,可以考虑这些因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信