Pediatric Practices' Experiences with Massachusetts' Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Shriya Jamakandi, Joan Li, Alyna T Chien, Matthew Alcusky, Michaela Kerrissey
{"title":"Pediatric Practices' Experiences with Massachusetts' Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations.","authors":"Shriya Jamakandi, Joan Li, Alyna T Chien, Matthew Alcusky, Michaela Kerrissey","doi":"10.1016/j.acap.2024.102601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the experience of Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) that include pediatric practices, including their motivations and experiences working together.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This mixed methods study is set within the first two years of the Massachusetts Medicaid ACO Program, which created 17 Medicaid ACOs across the Commonwealth in 2018. It combines qualitative interviews from organizational leaders across three Medicaid ACOs with pediatric representation (N=28; purposive sample; 2018) with a 44-item primary care practice leader survey (N=225 after 64% response rate; statewide stratified random sample of primary care practices; 2019). Interviews gathered information about organizational motivations and experiences with becoming a Medicaid ACO; the survey asked five domains of questions describing the experience of pediatric- and adult-focused primary care practices in joining Medicaid ACOs (e.g., how much practices solved problems jointly with the ACO). We used ordinary least squares regression to describe differences in experiences across pediatric vs. non-pediatric practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Leaders of Medicaid ACO with pediatric representation expressed a desire to voice pediatric concerns regarding state Medicaid payment policy and to integrate social services as part of routine medical care. Relative to the experience of adult-focused primary care practice leaders, pediatric-focused practices reported less collaboration within the Medicaid ACO (95% confidence interval 0.81 to 0.05; p = 0.03) and less change toward standardization of policies such as physician compensation (95% confidence interval 0.61 to 0.02; p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Initial Medicaid ACO experiences can differ based on the degree to which organizations joining Medicaid ACO programs serve pediatric populations.</p><p><strong>Article summary: </strong>Early in Massachusetts' implementation of Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations (ACO), pediatric-focused practices reported less collaboration and standardization within their Medicaid ACOs than adult-focused practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":50930,"journal":{"name":"Academic Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"102601"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2024.102601","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine the experience of Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) that include pediatric practices, including their motivations and experiences working together.

Methods: This mixed methods study is set within the first two years of the Massachusetts Medicaid ACO Program, which created 17 Medicaid ACOs across the Commonwealth in 2018. It combines qualitative interviews from organizational leaders across three Medicaid ACOs with pediatric representation (N=28; purposive sample; 2018) with a 44-item primary care practice leader survey (N=225 after 64% response rate; statewide stratified random sample of primary care practices; 2019). Interviews gathered information about organizational motivations and experiences with becoming a Medicaid ACO; the survey asked five domains of questions describing the experience of pediatric- and adult-focused primary care practices in joining Medicaid ACOs (e.g., how much practices solved problems jointly with the ACO). We used ordinary least squares regression to describe differences in experiences across pediatric vs. non-pediatric practices.

Results: Leaders of Medicaid ACO with pediatric representation expressed a desire to voice pediatric concerns regarding state Medicaid payment policy and to integrate social services as part of routine medical care. Relative to the experience of adult-focused primary care practice leaders, pediatric-focused practices reported less collaboration within the Medicaid ACO (95% confidence interval 0.81 to 0.05; p = 0.03) and less change toward standardization of policies such as physician compensation (95% confidence interval 0.61 to 0.02; p = 0.04).

Conclusions: Initial Medicaid ACO experiences can differ based on the degree to which organizations joining Medicaid ACO programs serve pediatric populations.

Article summary: Early in Massachusetts' implementation of Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations (ACO), pediatric-focused practices reported less collaboration and standardization within their Medicaid ACOs than adult-focused practices.

儿科医疗机构对马萨诸塞州医疗补助责任医疗组织的体验。
目的研究包括儿科诊所在内的医疗补助责任医疗组织(ACO)的经验,包括其合作动机和经验:这项混合方法研究以马萨诸塞州医疗补助 ACO 计划的头两年为背景,该计划于 2018 年在全联邦范围内创建了 17 个医疗补助 ACO。研究结合了对三个有儿科代表的医疗补助 ACO 的组织领导者的定性访谈(N=28;目的性抽样;2018 年)和 44 个项目的初级保健实践领导者调查(N=225,回复率为 64%;全州初级保健实践分层随机抽样;2019 年)。访谈收集了有关成为医疗补助 ACO 的组织动机和经验的信息;调查提出了五个领域的问题,描述了以儿科和成人为重点的初级医疗实践加入医疗补助 ACO 的经验(例如,实践与 ACO 共同解决问题的程度)。我们使用普通最小二乘法回归来描述儿科与非儿科实践经验的差异:有儿科代表参加的医疗补助 ACO 的领导者表示,希望表达儿科对州医疗补助支付政策的关切,并将社会服务作为常规医疗服务的一部分。与以成人为主的初级医疗实践领导者的经验相比,以儿科为主的实践者在医疗补助 ACO 中的合作较少(95% 置信区间为 0.81 至 0.05;p = 0.03),对医生报酬等政策的标准化改变较少(95% 置信区间为 0.61 至 0.02;p = 0.04):文章摘要:在马萨诸塞州实施医疗补助责任医疗组织(ACO)的初期,以儿科为重点的医疗机构与以成人为重点的医疗机构相比,其医疗补助ACO内部的合作和标准化程度较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Pediatrics
Academic Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.90%
发文量
300
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Academic Pediatrics, the official journal of the Academic Pediatric Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to strengthen the research and educational base of academic general pediatrics. The journal provides leadership in pediatric education, research, patient care and advocacy. Content areas include pediatric education, emergency medicine, injury, abuse, behavioral pediatrics, holistic medicine, child health services and health policy,and the environment. The journal provides an active forum for the presentation of pediatric educational research in diverse settings, involving medical students, residents, fellows, and practicing professionals. The journal also emphasizes important research relating to the quality of child health care, health care policy, and the organization of child health services. It also includes systematic reviews of primary care interventions and important methodologic papers to aid research in child health and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信