Associations between preschooler screen time trajectories and executive function.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Caroline Fitzpatrick, Elena Florit, Annie Lemieux, Gabrielle Garon-Carrier, Lucia Mason
{"title":"Associations between preschooler screen time trajectories and executive function.","authors":"Caroline Fitzpatrick, Elena Florit, Annie Lemieux, Gabrielle Garon-Carrier, Lucia Mason","doi":"10.1016/j.acap.2024.102603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine associations between preschooler screen time trajectories and executive functions and effortful control at age 5.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective, community-based convenience sample of 315 parents of preschoolers (54% male), studied at the ages of 3.5 (2020), 4.5 (2021), and 5.5 (2022). Parent-reported screen use at the ages of 3.5, 4.5, and 5.5 was used to estimate preschooler screen use trajectories. Using latent growth modeling, we identified low (mean=.9 hrs/day, 23%), medium (mean=3.0 hrs/day, 56%), and high (mean=6.38 hrs/day, 21%) screen time groups. Children completed assessments of inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility at age 5.5. Both tasks are from the NIH Toolbox. Parents reported child effortful control at the age of 3.5 and 5.5 using the Children's Behavior Questionnaire, educational attainment, and parenting stress.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Children in the average (b =-5.24) and high (b=.9.30) screen time trajectories scored significantly lower on inhibitory control than those in the low screen time group. Children in the average and high screen time groups also scored higher than children in the low screen time group on cognitive flexibility (b =-4.50) and (b=-10.12), respectively. Finally, children in the average and high screen time groups scored lower than children in the low screen time groups on effortful control (b =-.41) and (b=-.61), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study shows that stability in high levels of screen use is common among preschoolers and may forecast higher risk of cognitive difficulty and lower levels of cognitive control by the time of school entry.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>High levels of preschooler screen use were associated with lower scores on assessments of inhibitory control, cognitive flexibility, and effortful control.</p>","PeriodicalId":50930,"journal":{"name":"Academic Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"102603"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2024.102603","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To examine associations between preschooler screen time trajectories and executive functions and effortful control at age 5.

Methods: Prospective, community-based convenience sample of 315 parents of preschoolers (54% male), studied at the ages of 3.5 (2020), 4.5 (2021), and 5.5 (2022). Parent-reported screen use at the ages of 3.5, 4.5, and 5.5 was used to estimate preschooler screen use trajectories. Using latent growth modeling, we identified low (mean=.9 hrs/day, 23%), medium (mean=3.0 hrs/day, 56%), and high (mean=6.38 hrs/day, 21%) screen time groups. Children completed assessments of inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility at age 5.5. Both tasks are from the NIH Toolbox. Parents reported child effortful control at the age of 3.5 and 5.5 using the Children's Behavior Questionnaire, educational attainment, and parenting stress.

Results: Children in the average (b =-5.24) and high (b=.9.30) screen time trajectories scored significantly lower on inhibitory control than those in the low screen time group. Children in the average and high screen time groups also scored higher than children in the low screen time group on cognitive flexibility (b =-4.50) and (b=-10.12), respectively. Finally, children in the average and high screen time groups scored lower than children in the low screen time groups on effortful control (b =-.41) and (b=-.61), respectively.

Conclusions: The present study shows that stability in high levels of screen use is common among preschoolers and may forecast higher risk of cognitive difficulty and lower levels of cognitive control by the time of school entry.

Summary: High levels of preschooler screen use were associated with lower scores on assessments of inhibitory control, cognitive flexibility, and effortful control.

学龄前儿童屏幕时间轨迹与执行功能之间的关联。
目的: 研究学龄前儿童屏幕时间轨迹与 5 岁时执行功能和努力控制之间的关系:研究学龄前儿童屏幕时间轨迹与 5 岁时执行功能和努力控制之间的关系:在学龄前儿童 3.5 岁(2020 年)、4.5 岁(2021 年)和 5.5 岁(2022 年)时,对 315 名学龄前儿童的家长(54% 为男性)进行前瞻性社区便利抽样调查。家长报告的 3.5 岁、4.5 岁和 5.5 岁时的屏幕使用情况被用来估计学龄前儿童的屏幕使用轨迹。通过潜在增长模型,我们确定了屏幕使用时间低(平均=0.9 小时/天,23%)、中(平均=3.0 小时/天,56%)和高(平均=6.38 小时/天,21%)组别。儿童在 5.5 岁时完成了抑制控制和认知灵活性评估。这两项任务均来自美国国立卫生研究院工具箱。家长使用儿童行为问卷、教育程度和养育压力报告了儿童在 3.5 岁和 5.5 岁时的努力控制情况:平均(b=-5.24)和高(b=.9.30)屏幕时间轨迹组儿童的抑制控制得分明显低于低屏幕时间组儿童。在认知灵活性(b=-4.50)和(b=-10.12)方面,平均和高屏幕时间组儿童的得分也分别高于低屏幕时间组儿童。最后,在努力控制(b=-.41)和(b=-.61)方面,平均和高屏幕时间组儿童的得分低于低屏幕时间组儿童:小结:学龄前儿童大量使用屏幕与抑制控制、认知灵活性和努力控制评估得分较低有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Pediatrics
Academic Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.90%
发文量
300
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Academic Pediatrics, the official journal of the Academic Pediatric Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to strengthen the research and educational base of academic general pediatrics. The journal provides leadership in pediatric education, research, patient care and advocacy. Content areas include pediatric education, emergency medicine, injury, abuse, behavioral pediatrics, holistic medicine, child health services and health policy,and the environment. The journal provides an active forum for the presentation of pediatric educational research in diverse settings, involving medical students, residents, fellows, and practicing professionals. The journal also emphasizes important research relating to the quality of child health care, health care policy, and the organization of child health services. It also includes systematic reviews of primary care interventions and important methodologic papers to aid research in child health and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信