Examining Whether Patient Portal and Video Visit Use Differs by Race and Ethnicity Among Older Adults in a US Integrated Health Care Delivery System: Cross-Sectional Electronic Health Record and Survey-Based Study.

IF 5 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
JMIR Aging Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.2196/63814
Nancy P Gordon, Chelsea Yin, Joan C Lo
{"title":"Examining Whether Patient Portal and Video Visit Use Differs by Race and Ethnicity Among Older Adults in a US Integrated Health Care Delivery System: Cross-Sectional Electronic Health Record and Survey-Based Study.","authors":"Nancy P Gordon, Chelsea Yin, Joan C Lo","doi":"10.2196/63814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health care systems are increasingly encouraging patients to use patient portals and participate in video visits. However, there is limited information about how portal use differs among older adults.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to understand how patient portal and video visit use differed by age, race, and ethnicity among older adult patients with access to the same digital health resources.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study used electronic health record and survey data for adults aged 65 to 85 years who were members of a large Northern California health care delivery system throughout 2019 and 2020. The electronic health record cohort (N=471,152) included 320,686 White, 35,892 Black, 44,922 Latino, 20,786 Chinese, 28,732 Filipino, 8473 South Asian, 6716 Japanese, 2930 Vietnamese, and 2015 Korean adults. Racial and ethnic group and age group (65 to 75 years vs 76 to 85 years) differences in having a patient portal account by December 2020, the performance of 2 portal activities (sending ≥1 message to a clinician in 2019 or 2020 and viewing ≥1 laboratory test result in 2020), and having ≥1 video visit during 2020 were examined. Modified log-Poisson regression was used to examine prevalence ratios for portal and video visit use, comparing racial and ethnic groups to White adults and Asian ethnic groups to Chinese adults after adjusting for sex and age. Data from a 2020 member survey were used to compare internet use factors among 2867 White, 306 Black, 343 Latino, 225 Chinese, and 242 Filipino adults.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Black, Latino, and Filipino adults were less likely to have a patient portal account than White adults, and Filipino adults were less likely to have a patient portal account than Chinese adults. Black, Latino, Filipino, Korean, Vietnamese, and South Asian adults were less likely to have sent messages and viewed test results than White adults, while Chinese and Japanese adults' use of these features was similar to that of White adults. Filipino, Vietnamese, and Korean adults were less likely to have performed the aforementioned activities than Chinese adults. Video visit use was lower among Black and Latino adults and higher among Chinese and South Asian adults compared with White adults (aged 76 to 85 years) and lower among Filipino, Korean, and Vietnamese adults compared to Chinese adults. Survey data suggested that underlying differences in internet use may partially explain the lower use of messaging by Black, Latino, and Filipino adults compared with White and Chinese adults.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patient portal and video visit use differed by race, ethnicity, and age group among older adult patients with access to the same patient portal. Internet use factors may contribute to these differences. Differences in patient portal and video visit use across Asian subgroups underscore the importance of disaggregating use data by Asian ethnicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":36245,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Aging","volume":"7 ","pages":"e63814"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11582487/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/63814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Health care systems are increasingly encouraging patients to use patient portals and participate in video visits. However, there is limited information about how portal use differs among older adults.

Objective: This study aimed to understand how patient portal and video visit use differed by age, race, and ethnicity among older adult patients with access to the same digital health resources.

Methods: This cross-sectional study used electronic health record and survey data for adults aged 65 to 85 years who were members of a large Northern California health care delivery system throughout 2019 and 2020. The electronic health record cohort (N=471,152) included 320,686 White, 35,892 Black, 44,922 Latino, 20,786 Chinese, 28,732 Filipino, 8473 South Asian, 6716 Japanese, 2930 Vietnamese, and 2015 Korean adults. Racial and ethnic group and age group (65 to 75 years vs 76 to 85 years) differences in having a patient portal account by December 2020, the performance of 2 portal activities (sending ≥1 message to a clinician in 2019 or 2020 and viewing ≥1 laboratory test result in 2020), and having ≥1 video visit during 2020 were examined. Modified log-Poisson regression was used to examine prevalence ratios for portal and video visit use, comparing racial and ethnic groups to White adults and Asian ethnic groups to Chinese adults after adjusting for sex and age. Data from a 2020 member survey were used to compare internet use factors among 2867 White, 306 Black, 343 Latino, 225 Chinese, and 242 Filipino adults.

Results: Black, Latino, and Filipino adults were less likely to have a patient portal account than White adults, and Filipino adults were less likely to have a patient portal account than Chinese adults. Black, Latino, Filipino, Korean, Vietnamese, and South Asian adults were less likely to have sent messages and viewed test results than White adults, while Chinese and Japanese adults' use of these features was similar to that of White adults. Filipino, Vietnamese, and Korean adults were less likely to have performed the aforementioned activities than Chinese adults. Video visit use was lower among Black and Latino adults and higher among Chinese and South Asian adults compared with White adults (aged 76 to 85 years) and lower among Filipino, Korean, and Vietnamese adults compared to Chinese adults. Survey data suggested that underlying differences in internet use may partially explain the lower use of messaging by Black, Latino, and Filipino adults compared with White and Chinese adults.

Conclusions: Patient portal and video visit use differed by race, ethnicity, and age group among older adult patients with access to the same patient portal. Internet use factors may contribute to these differences. Differences in patient portal and video visit use across Asian subgroups underscore the importance of disaggregating use data by Asian ethnicity.

研究美国综合医疗服务系统中老年人使用患者门户网站和视频就诊的情况是否因种族和民族而异:基于电子健康记录和调查的跨部门研究。
背景:医疗保健系统越来越多地鼓励患者使用患者门户网站并参与视频就诊。然而,有关老年人使用门户网站的不同情况的信息却很有限:本研究旨在了解可访问相同数字医疗资源的老年患者在年龄、种族和民族方面使用患者门户网站和视频访问的差异:这项横断面研究使用了电子健康记录和调查数据,调查对象为 65 至 85 岁的成年人,他们在 2019 年和 2020 年期间都是北加州一家大型医疗保健服务系统的成员。电子健康记录队列(N=471,152)包括 320,686 名白人、35,892 名黑人、44,922 名拉丁裔、20,786 名华裔、28,732 名菲律宾裔、8473 名南亚裔、6716 名日裔、2930 名越南裔和 2015 名韩裔成年人。研究了种族、民族和年龄组(65 至 75 岁 vs 76 至 85 岁)在 2020 年 12 月之前拥有患者门户账户、进行 2 项门户活动(2019 年或 2020 年向临床医生发送 ≥1 条信息和 2020 年查看 ≥1 项实验室检测结果)以及 2020 年期间进行 ≥1 次视频就诊方面的差异。在对性别和年龄进行调整后,使用修正的对数-泊松回归来检查门户网站和视频访问使用的流行率,并将种族和民族群体与白人成人进行比较,将亚洲民族群体与中国成人进行比较。2020 年成员调查的数据用于比较 2867 名白人、306 名黑人、343 名拉丁裔、225 名华裔和 242 名菲律宾裔成年人的互联网使用因素:黑人、拉丁裔和菲律宾裔成年人拥有患者门户网站账户的可能性低于白人成年人,菲律宾裔成年人拥有患者门户网站账户的可能性低于华裔成年人。黑人、拉丁裔、菲律宾裔、韩裔、越南裔和南亚裔成年人发送信息和查看测试结果的可能性低于白人成年人,而华裔和日裔成年人使用这些功能的情况与白人成年人相似。菲律宾、越南和韩国成年人进行上述活动的可能性低于中国成年人。与白人成年人(76 至 85 岁)相比,黑人和拉美裔成年人的视频访问使用率较低,而华裔和南亚裔成年人的使用率较高,与华裔成年人相比,菲律宾裔、韩裔和越南裔成年人的使用率较低。调查数据表明,互联网使用方面的潜在差异可能部分解释了黑人、拉丁裔和菲律宾裔成年人与白人和华裔成年人相比信息使用率较低的原因:结论:在使用同一患者门户网站的老年患者中,不同种族、族裔和年龄组的患者在使用患者门户网站和视频就诊方面存在差异。互联网使用因素可能是造成这些差异的原因。亚裔亚群在使用患者门户网站和视频就诊方面的差异凸显了按亚裔分列使用数据的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Aging
JMIR Aging Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信