From historical drugs to present perils: UHPLC-QqQ-MS/MS determination of methaqualone and its designer analogs (NPS) with comprehensive fragmentation pathways study (QTOF).

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q1 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Kaja Tusiewicz, Olga Wachełko, Paweł Szpot, Marcin Zawadzki
{"title":"From historical drugs to present perils: UHPLC-QqQ-MS/MS determination of methaqualone and its designer analogs (NPS) with comprehensive fragmentation pathways study (QTOF).","authors":"Kaja Tusiewicz, Olga Wachełko, Paweł Szpot, Marcin Zawadzki","doi":"10.1080/15376516.2024.2426582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Methaqualone, introduced in the 1960s as a sedative-hypnotic alternative to barbiturates, was withdrawn from the market due to its side effects and growing recreational use. Despite this, interest in methaqualone and its analogs remains high, raising concerns about potential abuse in the future. An ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography method coupled with triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-QqQ-MS/MS) was developed to determine nine methaqualone-related compounds simultaneously. Biological samples were prepared using liquid-liquid extraction with ethyl acetate at pH9; quantification was performed in blood using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode. Methaqualone-<i>d<sub>7</sub></i> served as an internal standard. The limit of quantification (LOQ) ranged from 0.1 to 0.2 ng/mL, with precision and accuracy within 20%. Recovery ranged from 84.2% to 113.7%. The developed method allowed chromatographic separation of all compounds tested, including two structural isomers: methylmethaqualone and etaqualone. The mass spectra acquired from quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer allowed for the elucidation of comprehensive fragmentation study of methaqualone derivatives. The described situation poses a significant problem from the analytical point of view, as well as interpretation and forensic toxicological expertise. The developed method will contribute to increased analytical capabilities and enhanced detection of compounds from the methaqualone group that may appear on the illicit market.</p>","PeriodicalId":23177,"journal":{"name":"Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15376516.2024.2426582","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Methaqualone, introduced in the 1960s as a sedative-hypnotic alternative to barbiturates, was withdrawn from the market due to its side effects and growing recreational use. Despite this, interest in methaqualone and its analogs remains high, raising concerns about potential abuse in the future. An ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography method coupled with triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-QqQ-MS/MS) was developed to determine nine methaqualone-related compounds simultaneously. Biological samples were prepared using liquid-liquid extraction with ethyl acetate at pH9; quantification was performed in blood using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode. Methaqualone-d7 served as an internal standard. The limit of quantification (LOQ) ranged from 0.1 to 0.2 ng/mL, with precision and accuracy within 20%. Recovery ranged from 84.2% to 113.7%. The developed method allowed chromatographic separation of all compounds tested, including two structural isomers: methylmethaqualone and etaqualone. The mass spectra acquired from quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer allowed for the elucidation of comprehensive fragmentation study of methaqualone derivatives. The described situation poses a significant problem from the analytical point of view, as well as interpretation and forensic toxicological expertise. The developed method will contribute to increased analytical capabilities and enhanced detection of compounds from the methaqualone group that may appear on the illicit market.

从历史上的毒品到现在的危险:利用综合碎片途径研究(QTOF)测定甲喹酮及其设计类似物(NPS)的超高效液相色谱-QqQ-MS/MS。
甲喹酮于 20 世纪 60 年代作为巴比妥类药物的镇静催眠替代品问世,但由于其副作用和日益增长的娱乐性使用而退出市场。尽管如此,人们对甲喹酮及其类似物的兴趣仍然很高,这引起了人们对未来可能出现的滥用现象的担忧。我们开发了一种超高效液相色谱法和三重四极杆串联质谱法(UHPLC-QqQ-MS/MS),可同时测定九种与甲喹酮有关的化合物。生物样品采用 pH 值为 9 的乙酸乙酯液液萃取法制备,血液样品采用多反应监测(MRM)模式进行定量。内标为甲喹酮-d7。定量限(LOQ)为 0.1 至 0.2 纳克/毫升,精密度和准确度均在 20% 以内。所开发的方法可对所有受测化合物进行色谱分离,包括两种结构异构体:甲噻吗喹酮和依他喹酮。通过四极杆飞行时间质谱仪获得的质谱图,可以对甲喹酮衍生物进行全面的碎片分析。所开发的方法将有助于提高分析能力,加强对可能出现在非法市场上的甲喹酮类化合物的检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
3.10%
发文量
66
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods is a peer-reviewed journal whose aim is twofold. Firstly, the journal contains original research on subjects dealing with the mechanisms by which foreign chemicals cause toxic tissue injury. Chemical substances of interest include industrial compounds, environmental pollutants, hazardous wastes, drugs, pesticides, and chemical warfare agents. The scope of the journal spans from molecular and cellular mechanisms of action to the consideration of mechanistic evidence in establishing regulatory policy. Secondly, the journal addresses aspects of the development, validation, and application of new and existing laboratory methods, techniques, and equipment. A variety of research methods are discussed, including: In vivo studies with standard and alternative species In vitro studies and alternative methodologies Molecular, biochemical, and cellular techniques Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics Mathematical modeling and computer programs Forensic analyses Risk assessment Data collection and analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信