Adapting to change: experiences and recommendations from the Pain Management Collaboratory on modifying statistical analysis plans.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1093/pm/pnae073
Qilu Yu, Steven Z George, Tassos C Kyriakides, Daniel I Rhon, Benjamin J Morasco, James Dziura, Julie M Fritz, Mary Geda, Peter Peduzzi, Cynthia R Long
{"title":"Adapting to change: experiences and recommendations from the Pain Management Collaboratory on modifying statistical analysis plans.","authors":"Qilu Yu, Steven Z George, Tassos C Kyriakides, Daniel I Rhon, Benjamin J Morasco, James Dziura, Julie M Fritz, Mary Geda, Peter Peduzzi, Cynthia R Long","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnae073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Best practices for clinical trials stipulate that statistical analysis plans (SAPs) need to be finalized before initiation of any analysis. However, there is limited guidance about when changes to SAPs are acceptable and how these changes should be incorporated into the research plan with appropriate documentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a survey of 12 pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs) in the Pain Management Collaboratory that evaluated nonpharmacological interventions for pain to assess the following SAP information: (1) location of statistical analysis details, (2) types of statistical analyses planned, (3) sponsor requirements, (4) templates used for development, (5) publication plan, (6) changes since trial launch, (7) process of documenting changes, and (8) process of updating the trial registry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 12 PCTs provided details of their SAPs for the primary outcomes in the institutional review board-approved trial protocol; 8 included plans for secondary outcomes, and 6 included plans for tertiary/exploratory outcomes. Most PCTs made SAP changes after trial initiation, many as a result of COVID-19-related issues. Eleven of the PCTs were actively recruiting participants. Changes were made to sample size, study design, study arms, and analytical methods, all before the data lock/unblinding. In all cases, justification for the changes was documented in the trial protocol or SAP, signed off by the trial biostatistician and principal investigator, and reviewed/approved by an institutional review board, data and safety monitoring board, or sponsor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We recommend that SAP changes can be acceptable up to the time of data lock/unblinding. To maintain full transparency and necessary rigor, clear documentation of such changes should include details, rationale, date(s) such changes were implemented, and evidence of approval by relevant oversight bodies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19744,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine","volume":"25 Supplement_1","pages":"S49-S53"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11548855/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnae073","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Best practices for clinical trials stipulate that statistical analysis plans (SAPs) need to be finalized before initiation of any analysis. However, there is limited guidance about when changes to SAPs are acceptable and how these changes should be incorporated into the research plan with appropriate documentation.

Methods: We conducted a survey of 12 pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs) in the Pain Management Collaboratory that evaluated nonpharmacological interventions for pain to assess the following SAP information: (1) location of statistical analysis details, (2) types of statistical analyses planned, (3) sponsor requirements, (4) templates used for development, (5) publication plan, (6) changes since trial launch, (7) process of documenting changes, and (8) process of updating the trial registry.

Results: All 12 PCTs provided details of their SAPs for the primary outcomes in the institutional review board-approved trial protocol; 8 included plans for secondary outcomes, and 6 included plans for tertiary/exploratory outcomes. Most PCTs made SAP changes after trial initiation, many as a result of COVID-19-related issues. Eleven of the PCTs were actively recruiting participants. Changes were made to sample size, study design, study arms, and analytical methods, all before the data lock/unblinding. In all cases, justification for the changes was documented in the trial protocol or SAP, signed off by the trial biostatistician and principal investigator, and reviewed/approved by an institutional review board, data and safety monitoring board, or sponsor.

Conclusions: We recommend that SAP changes can be acceptable up to the time of data lock/unblinding. To maintain full transparency and necessary rigor, clear documentation of such changes should include details, rationale, date(s) such changes were implemented, and evidence of approval by relevant oversight bodies.

适应变化:疼痛管理合作组织关于修改统计分析计划的经验和建议。
背景:临床试验的最佳实践规定,统计分析计划(SAP)需要在开始任何分析之前最终确定。然而,关于何时可以接受对 SAP 的更改以及如何将这些更改纳入研究计划并进行适当记录的指导却很有限:方法:我们对疼痛管理协作组中12项评估疼痛非药物干预的实用临床试验(PCT)进行了调查,以评估以下SAP信息:(1)统计分析细节的位置;(2)计划进行的统计分析类型;(3)申办者要求;(4)用于开发的模板;(5)出版计划;(6)试验启动后的变更;(7)记录变更的流程;(8)更新试验登记的流程:所有12个PCT都提供了机构审查委员会批准的试验方案中主要结果的SAP详情;8个PCT提供了次要结果的计划,6个PCT提供了第三/探索性结果的计划。大多数 PCT 在试验开始后对 SAP 进行了修改,其中许多是由于 COVID-19 相关问题造成的。有 11 个 PCT 正在积极招募参与者。对样本量、研究设计、研究臂和分析方法的更改都发生在数据锁定/解盲之前。在所有情况下,变更的理由都记录在试验方案或 SAP 中,由试验生物统计学家和主要研究者签字,并由机构审查委员会、数据与安全监控委员会或申办者审查/批准:我们建议,在数据锁定/取消盲法之前,可以接受 SAP 更改。为保持充分的透明度和必要的严谨性,此类变更的清晰文档应包括细节、理由、变更实施日期以及相关监督机构批准的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Medicine
Pain Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
187
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Pain Medicine is a multi-disciplinary journal dedicated to pain clinicians, educators and researchers with an interest in pain from various medical specialties such as pain medicine, anaesthesiology, family practice, internal medicine, neurology, neurological surgery, orthopaedic spine surgery, psychiatry, and rehabilitation medicine as well as related health disciplines such as psychology, neuroscience, nursing, nurse practitioner, physical therapy, and integrative health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信