Qilu Yu, Steven Z George, Tassos C Kyriakides, Daniel I Rhon, Benjamin J Morasco, James Dziura, Julie M Fritz, Mary Geda, Peter Peduzzi, Cynthia R Long
{"title":"Adapting to change: experiences and recommendations from the Pain Management Collaboratory on modifying statistical analysis plans.","authors":"Qilu Yu, Steven Z George, Tassos C Kyriakides, Daniel I Rhon, Benjamin J Morasco, James Dziura, Julie M Fritz, Mary Geda, Peter Peduzzi, Cynthia R Long","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnae073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Best practices for clinical trials stipulate that statistical analysis plans (SAPs) need to be finalized before initiation of any analysis. However, there is limited guidance about when changes to SAPs are acceptable and how these changes should be incorporated into the research plan with appropriate documentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a survey of 12 pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs) in the Pain Management Collaboratory that evaluated nonpharmacological interventions for pain to assess the following SAP information: (1) location of statistical analysis details, (2) types of statistical analyses planned, (3) sponsor requirements, (4) templates used for development, (5) publication plan, (6) changes since trial launch, (7) process of documenting changes, and (8) process of updating the trial registry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 12 PCTs provided details of their SAPs for the primary outcomes in the institutional review board-approved trial protocol; 8 included plans for secondary outcomes, and 6 included plans for tertiary/exploratory outcomes. Most PCTs made SAP changes after trial initiation, many as a result of COVID-19-related issues. Eleven of the PCTs were actively recruiting participants. Changes were made to sample size, study design, study arms, and analytical methods, all before the data lock/unblinding. In all cases, justification for the changes was documented in the trial protocol or SAP, signed off by the trial biostatistician and principal investigator, and reviewed/approved by an institutional review board, data and safety monitoring board, or sponsor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We recommend that SAP changes can be acceptable up to the time of data lock/unblinding. To maintain full transparency and necessary rigor, clear documentation of such changes should include details, rationale, date(s) such changes were implemented, and evidence of approval by relevant oversight bodies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19744,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine","volume":"25 Supplement_1","pages":"S49-S53"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11548855/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnae073","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Best practices for clinical trials stipulate that statistical analysis plans (SAPs) need to be finalized before initiation of any analysis. However, there is limited guidance about when changes to SAPs are acceptable and how these changes should be incorporated into the research plan with appropriate documentation.
Methods: We conducted a survey of 12 pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs) in the Pain Management Collaboratory that evaluated nonpharmacological interventions for pain to assess the following SAP information: (1) location of statistical analysis details, (2) types of statistical analyses planned, (3) sponsor requirements, (4) templates used for development, (5) publication plan, (6) changes since trial launch, (7) process of documenting changes, and (8) process of updating the trial registry.
Results: All 12 PCTs provided details of their SAPs for the primary outcomes in the institutional review board-approved trial protocol; 8 included plans for secondary outcomes, and 6 included plans for tertiary/exploratory outcomes. Most PCTs made SAP changes after trial initiation, many as a result of COVID-19-related issues. Eleven of the PCTs were actively recruiting participants. Changes were made to sample size, study design, study arms, and analytical methods, all before the data lock/unblinding. In all cases, justification for the changes was documented in the trial protocol or SAP, signed off by the trial biostatistician and principal investigator, and reviewed/approved by an institutional review board, data and safety monitoring board, or sponsor.
Conclusions: We recommend that SAP changes can be acceptable up to the time of data lock/unblinding. To maintain full transparency and necessary rigor, clear documentation of such changes should include details, rationale, date(s) such changes were implemented, and evidence of approval by relevant oversight bodies.
背景:临床试验的最佳实践规定,统计分析计划(SAP)需要在开始任何分析之前最终确定。然而,关于何时可以接受对 SAP 的更改以及如何将这些更改纳入研究计划并进行适当记录的指导却很有限:方法:我们对疼痛管理协作组中12项评估疼痛非药物干预的实用临床试验(PCT)进行了调查,以评估以下SAP信息:(1)统计分析细节的位置;(2)计划进行的统计分析类型;(3)申办者要求;(4)用于开发的模板;(5)出版计划;(6)试验启动后的变更;(7)记录变更的流程;(8)更新试验登记的流程:所有12个PCT都提供了机构审查委员会批准的试验方案中主要结果的SAP详情;8个PCT提供了次要结果的计划,6个PCT提供了第三/探索性结果的计划。大多数 PCT 在试验开始后对 SAP 进行了修改,其中许多是由于 COVID-19 相关问题造成的。有 11 个 PCT 正在积极招募参与者。对样本量、研究设计、研究臂和分析方法的更改都发生在数据锁定/解盲之前。在所有情况下,变更的理由都记录在试验方案或 SAP 中,由试验生物统计学家和主要研究者签字,并由机构审查委员会、数据与安全监控委员会或申办者审查/批准:我们建议,在数据锁定/取消盲法之前,可以接受 SAP 更改。为保持充分的透明度和必要的严谨性,此类变更的清晰文档应包括细节、理由、变更实施日期以及相关监督机构批准的证据。
期刊介绍:
Pain Medicine is a multi-disciplinary journal dedicated to pain clinicians, educators and researchers with an interest in pain from various medical specialties such as pain medicine, anaesthesiology, family practice, internal medicine, neurology, neurological surgery, orthopaedic spine surgery, psychiatry, and rehabilitation medicine as well as related health disciplines such as psychology, neuroscience, nursing, nurse practitioner, physical therapy, and integrative health.