Is the PHQ-2 a Good Measure to Inform Providers About Patient Well-Being and Functioning? Data From the Veterans Health and Life Survey.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Medical Care Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000002069
David E Reed, Charles C Engel, Scott Coggeshall, Martha Michel, Bella Etingen, Rendelle E Bolton, Kurt Kroenke, Barbara G Bokhour, Steven B Zeliadt
{"title":"Is the PHQ-2 a Good Measure to Inform Providers About Patient Well-Being and Functioning? Data From the Veterans Health and Life Survey.","authors":"David E Reed, Charles C Engel, Scott Coggeshall, Martha Michel, Bella Etingen, Rendelle E Bolton, Kurt Kroenke, Barbara G Bokhour, Steven B Zeliadt","doi":"10.1097/MLR.0000000000002069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health care systems are increasingly focused on assessing patient well-being and functioning. The objective of the current analysis was to evaluate a pragmatic question: to what extent and in what way can the PHQ-2, a routinely collected screening measure, be used to help clinicians and a learning health system understand the well-being and functioning of its beneficiaries?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The current analysis focused on 2872 Veterans who completed a large-scale longitudinal survey about health and wellness for whom we were able to link survey responses to PHQ-2 scores recorded in their electronic health records (EHR). Regression analyses examined the cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between PHQ-2 scores recorded in the EHR and measures of well-being (life satisfaction, purpose in life, and social health) and functioning (pain severity and interference, physical and mental health, and perceived stress).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Veterans were aged 65 years on average (11% women). PHQ-2 scores were correlated cross-sectionally with all well-being and functioning measures; however, there was minimal variance accounted for. Changes in the PHQ-2 over time were associated with 3 measures: purpose in life (b = -0.19; 95% CI: -0.34, -0.04), mental health functioning (b = -0.29, 95% CI: -0.54, -0.04), and perceived stress (b = 0.13; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.24).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PHQ-2 was minimally associated with patient well-being and functioning, with more work needed on how the PHQ-2 may be used in large health care settings within the context of VA Whole Health. Assessment of well-being is critical as VA's Whole Health transformation continues, and identifying strategies for well-being measurement is an integral next step.</p>","PeriodicalId":18364,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care","volume":"62 12 Suppl 1","pages":"S76-S83"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11548814/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Care","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000002069","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Health care systems are increasingly focused on assessing patient well-being and functioning. The objective of the current analysis was to evaluate a pragmatic question: to what extent and in what way can the PHQ-2, a routinely collected screening measure, be used to help clinicians and a learning health system understand the well-being and functioning of its beneficiaries?

Methods: The current analysis focused on 2872 Veterans who completed a large-scale longitudinal survey about health and wellness for whom we were able to link survey responses to PHQ-2 scores recorded in their electronic health records (EHR). Regression analyses examined the cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between PHQ-2 scores recorded in the EHR and measures of well-being (life satisfaction, purpose in life, and social health) and functioning (pain severity and interference, physical and mental health, and perceived stress).

Results: Veterans were aged 65 years on average (11% women). PHQ-2 scores were correlated cross-sectionally with all well-being and functioning measures; however, there was minimal variance accounted for. Changes in the PHQ-2 over time were associated with 3 measures: purpose in life (b = -0.19; 95% CI: -0.34, -0.04), mental health functioning (b = -0.29, 95% CI: -0.54, -0.04), and perceived stress (b = 0.13; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.24).

Conclusions: The PHQ-2 was minimally associated with patient well-being and functioning, with more work needed on how the PHQ-2 may be used in large health care settings within the context of VA Whole Health. Assessment of well-being is critical as VA's Whole Health transformation continues, and identifying strategies for well-being measurement is an integral next step.

PHQ-2是向医护人员提供患者健康和功能信息的良好测量方法吗?退伍军人健康与生活调查数据。
背景:医疗保健系统越来越重视评估患者的健康状况和功能。本次分析的目的是评估一个务实的问题:PHQ-2 这一常规收集的筛查指标能在多大程度上以何种方式用于帮助临床医生和学习型医疗系统了解其受益人的健康和功能?目前的分析主要针对 2872 名退伍军人,这些退伍军人完成了一项有关健康和幸福感的大规模纵向调查,我们能够将这些退伍军人的调查回答与他们的电子健康记录(EHR)中记录的 PHQ-2 分数联系起来。回归分析检验了 EHR 中记录的 PHQ-2 分数与幸福感(生活满意度、生活目标和社会健康)和功能(疼痛严重程度和干扰、身心健康和感知压力)测量值之间的横向和纵向联系:退伍军人的平均年龄为 65 岁(女性占 11%)。PHQ-2得分与所有幸福感和功能测量结果均有横截面相关性;但是,所包含的方差很小。随着时间的推移,PHQ-2 的变化与 3 个测量指标相关:生活目标(b = -0.19;95% CI:-0.34,-0.04)、心理健康功能(b = -0.29,95% CI:-0.54,-0.04)和感知压力(b = 0.13;95% CI:0.02,0.24):PHQ-2与患者的幸福感和功能相关性很小,还需要进一步研究如何在退伍军人事务部整体健康的背景下将PHQ-2用于大型医疗机构。随着退伍军人事务部整体健康转型的继续,幸福感评估至关重要,而确定幸福感测量策略是下一步不可或缺的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Care
Medical Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
228
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Rated as one of the top ten journals in healthcare administration, Medical Care is devoted to all aspects of the administration and delivery of healthcare. This scholarly journal publishes original, peer-reviewed papers documenting the most current developments in the rapidly changing field of healthcare. This timely journal reports on the findings of original investigations into issues related to the research, planning, organization, financing, provision, and evaluation of health services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信