Thoracic irrigation for traumatic hemothorax: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Nicole B Lyons, Brianna L Collie, Michael D Cobler-Lichter, Jessica M Delamater, Larisa Shagabayeva, Luciana Tito-Bustillos, Kenneth G Proctor, Julie Y Valenzuela, Jonathan P Meizoso, Nicholas Namias
{"title":"Thoracic irrigation for traumatic hemothorax: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Nicole B Lyons, Brianna L Collie, Michael D Cobler-Lichter, Jessica M Delamater, Larisa Shagabayeva, Luciana Tito-Bustillos, Kenneth G Proctor, Julie Y Valenzuela, Jonathan P Meizoso, Nicholas Namias","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traumatic hemothoraces (HTXs) are common, and tube thoracostomy (TT) insertion is generally the initial management. However, a retained HTX can develop into a fibrothorax or empyema requiring secondary intervention. We hypothesized that irrigation of the thoracic cavity at the time of TT may prevent retained HTX.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pubmed, EMBASE, and Scopus were searched from inception to May 2024. Studies with adult trauma patients with traumatic HTX who received a TT and had patients who underwent thoracic irrigation were included. The primary outcome was failure rate, defined as retained HTX requiring a second intervention. Cumulative analysis was performed with χ2 for dichotomous variables and unpaired t test for continuous variables. A fixed-effects model was applied for meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies were included in the analysis; two retrospective and four prospective observational studies. These studies included 1,319 patients (513 irrigated TT, 837 nonirrigated TT). The mean age of patients was 45 years, 81% were male, mean Injury Severity Score was 21, and 42% had penetrating trauma. Failure rate was significantly lower in the irrigation group on cumulative analysis (10.7% vs. 18.2%, p < 0.001) and meta-analysis (effect size, 0.704; 95% confidence interval, 0.218-1.190; I2 = 0.4; p < 0.001]. In addition, on meta-analysis, the irrigation group had a shorter TT duration and hospital and ICU length of stay (all p < 0.05). There were no differences in overall infectious complications, readmission, or mortality; however, all the models favored the irrigation group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients who undergo simultaneous TT and thoracic irrigation have a lower rate of retained HTX and require fewer secondary interventions. Thoracic irrigation for traumatic HTX should be considered; however, randomized studies are needed prior to development of guidelines.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Systematic Review/Meta-analysis; Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004479","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Traumatic hemothoraces (HTXs) are common, and tube thoracostomy (TT) insertion is generally the initial management. However, a retained HTX can develop into a fibrothorax or empyema requiring secondary intervention. We hypothesized that irrigation of the thoracic cavity at the time of TT may prevent retained HTX.

Methods: Pubmed, EMBASE, and Scopus were searched from inception to May 2024. Studies with adult trauma patients with traumatic HTX who received a TT and had patients who underwent thoracic irrigation were included. The primary outcome was failure rate, defined as retained HTX requiring a second intervention. Cumulative analysis was performed with χ2 for dichotomous variables and unpaired t test for continuous variables. A fixed-effects model was applied for meta-analysis.

Results: Six studies were included in the analysis; two retrospective and four prospective observational studies. These studies included 1,319 patients (513 irrigated TT, 837 nonirrigated TT). The mean age of patients was 45 years, 81% were male, mean Injury Severity Score was 21, and 42% had penetrating trauma. Failure rate was significantly lower in the irrigation group on cumulative analysis (10.7% vs. 18.2%, p < 0.001) and meta-analysis (effect size, 0.704; 95% confidence interval, 0.218-1.190; I2 = 0.4; p < 0.001]. In addition, on meta-analysis, the irrigation group had a shorter TT duration and hospital and ICU length of stay (all p < 0.05). There were no differences in overall infectious complications, readmission, or mortality; however, all the models favored the irrigation group.

Conclusion: Patients who undergo simultaneous TT and thoracic irrigation have a lower rate of retained HTX and require fewer secondary interventions. Thoracic irrigation for traumatic HTX should be considered; however, randomized studies are needed prior to development of guidelines.

Level of evidence: Systematic Review/Meta-analysis; Level III.

胸腔冲洗治疗外伤性血气胸:系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:外伤性血胸(HTXs)很常见,插入管式胸腔造口术(TT)通常是最初的治疗方法。然而,滞留的血胸可能发展成纤维胸或气胸,需要二次干预。我们假设在进行 TT 时对胸腔进行冲洗可防止 HTX 滞留:方法:对 Pubmed、EMBASE 和 Scopus 从开始到 2024 年 5 月进行了检索。方法:检索了自 2024 年 5 月开始的 Pubmed、EMBASE 和 Scopus,纳入了关于接受 TT 的创伤性 HTX 成人创伤患者以及接受胸腔冲洗的患者的研究。主要结果是失败率,定义为需要二次干预的残留 HTX。对二分变量采用χ2进行累积分析,对连续变量采用非配对t检验。荟萃分析采用固定效应模型:分析共纳入六项研究:两项回顾性研究和四项前瞻性观察研究。这些研究共纳入 1319 名患者(513 名灌溉 TT 患者,837 名非灌溉 TT 患者)。患者的平均年龄为 45 岁,81% 为男性,平均伤害严重程度评分为 21 分,42% 有穿透性创伤。根据累积分析(10.7% vs. 18.2%,p < 0.001)和荟萃分析(效应大小,0.704;95% 置信区间,0.218-1.190;I2 = 0.4;p < 0.001],灌溉组的失败率明显较低。此外,在荟萃分析中,灌洗组的 TT 持续时间、住院时间和重症监护室住院时间较短(均 p <0.05)。总体感染并发症、再入院率或死亡率方面没有差异;但所有模型均有利于灌洗组:结论:同时接受 TT 和胸腔冲洗的患者 HTX 残留率较低,需要的二次干预也较少。应考虑对创伤性 HTX 进行胸腔冲洗;但在制定指南之前需要进行随机研究:证据级别:系统综述/荟萃分析;III 级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
11.80%
发文量
637
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery® is designed to provide the scientific basis to optimize care of the severely injured and critically ill surgical patient. Thus, the Journal has a high priority for basic and translation research to fulfill this objectives. Additionally, the Journal is enthusiastic to publish randomized prospective clinical studies to establish care predicated on a mechanistic foundation. Finally, the Journal is seeking systematic reviews, guidelines and algorithms that incorporate the best evidence available.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信