Tonya Chera, Mary Tinetti, Jasmine Travers, James Galske, Arjun K Venkatesh, Lauren Southerland, Scott M Dresden, Colleen McQuown, Cameron J Gettel
{"title":"\"What Matters\" in the Emergency Department: A Prospective Analysis of Older Adults' Concerns and Desired Outcomes.","authors":"Tonya Chera, Mary Tinetti, Jasmine Travers, James Galske, Arjun K Venkatesh, Lauren Southerland, Scott M Dresden, Colleen McQuown, Cameron J Gettel","doi":"10.1097/MLR.0000000000002053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe \"What Matters\" to older adults seeking emergency department (ED) care and to identify patient characteristics associated with meeting desired outcomes.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>As part of the 4Ms framework, identifying \"What Matters\" has been captured across healthcare settings, yet limited attention has been directed to older adults in the ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective observational study. The study enrolled 1013 patients aged 65 and older during an ED encounter and performed 90-day follow-up interviews. The primary outcome was the quantification of \"What Matters\" (concerns and desired outcomes) to older adults during emergency care. As secondary outcomes, we assessed concerns at day 90, if desired outcomes were met at follow-up, and patient characteristics associated with outcome achievement by estimating multivariable logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Older adults reported specific concerns at the time of the ED visit including: (1) symptom identification and/or persistence (31.4%), (2) ability to take care of oneself (19.4%), and (3) end-of-life (17.8%). Desired outcomes expressed by participants included: (1) getting well and symptom resolution (72.0%), (2) obtaining a diagnosis (25.7%), and (3) functional independence (19.5%). At day 90 follow-up, concerns remained similar to the initial ED visit, and the majority of participants (66.2%) achieved their desired outcome. Frailty (adjusted odds ratio = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.38-0.83, P < 0.01) was associated with older adults not meeting their desired outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Older adults identified a variety of concerns during emergency care, and two-thirds reported that desired outcomes were met at longitudinal day 90 follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":18364,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care","volume":"62 12 Suppl 1","pages":"S50-S56"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11548826/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000002053","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To describe "What Matters" to older adults seeking emergency department (ED) care and to identify patient characteristics associated with meeting desired outcomes.
Background: As part of the 4Ms framework, identifying "What Matters" has been captured across healthcare settings, yet limited attention has been directed to older adults in the ED.
Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective observational study. The study enrolled 1013 patients aged 65 and older during an ED encounter and performed 90-day follow-up interviews. The primary outcome was the quantification of "What Matters" (concerns and desired outcomes) to older adults during emergency care. As secondary outcomes, we assessed concerns at day 90, if desired outcomes were met at follow-up, and patient characteristics associated with outcome achievement by estimating multivariable logistic regression models.
Results: Older adults reported specific concerns at the time of the ED visit including: (1) symptom identification and/or persistence (31.4%), (2) ability to take care of oneself (19.4%), and (3) end-of-life (17.8%). Desired outcomes expressed by participants included: (1) getting well and symptom resolution (72.0%), (2) obtaining a diagnosis (25.7%), and (3) functional independence (19.5%). At day 90 follow-up, concerns remained similar to the initial ED visit, and the majority of participants (66.2%) achieved their desired outcome. Frailty (adjusted odds ratio = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.38-0.83, P < 0.01) was associated with older adults not meeting their desired outcomes.
Conclusions: Older adults identified a variety of concerns during emergency care, and two-thirds reported that desired outcomes were met at longitudinal day 90 follow-up.
期刊介绍:
Rated as one of the top ten journals in healthcare administration, Medical Care is devoted to all aspects of the administration and delivery of healthcare. This scholarly journal publishes original, peer-reviewed papers documenting the most current developments in the rapidly changing field of healthcare. This timely journal reports on the findings of original investigations into issues related to the research, planning, organization, financing, provision, and evaluation of health services.