Primary Care Practice Telehealth Use and Low-Value Care Services.

IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Terrence Liu, Ziwei Zhu, Michael P Thompson, Jeffrey S McCullough, Hechuan Hou, Chiang-Hua Chang, A Mark Fendrick, Chad Ellimoottil
{"title":"Primary Care Practice Telehealth Use and Low-Value Care Services.","authors":"Terrence Liu, Ziwei Zhu, Michael P Thompson, Jeffrey S McCullough, Hechuan Hou, Chiang-Hua Chang, A Mark Fendrick, Chad Ellimoottil","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.45436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The rapid expansion of telehealth transformed how primary care practices deliver care; however, uncertainties about the quality of telehealth-delivered care compared with in-person care remain. While there are concerns that increased telehealth may introduce wasteful care, how telehealth affects the delivery of low-value care is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine whether a primary care practice's level of telehealth use is associated with changes in the rates of low-value care.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This retrospective cohort study using a difference-in-differences study design was conducted from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2022, using Medicare fee-for-service claims data. Participants were Medicare beneficiaries attributed to primary care practices in Michigan.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Low, medium, or high tertile of practice-level telehealth use.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Low-value care was assessed using 8 claims-based measures relevant to primary care, grouped into 4 main categories: office-based, laboratory-based, imaging-based, and mixed-modality services. Poisson regression models were used to estimate the association between practice-level telehealth use and rates of low-value care services, controlling for practice-level characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 577 928 beneficiaries (332 100 [57%] women; mean [SD] age, 76 [8] years) attributed to 2552 primary care practices were included in the study. After adjusting for practice-level characteristics and baseline differences in low-value care rates between telehealth use groups, high practice-level telehealth use was associated with lower rates of low-value cervical cancer screening (-2.9 [95% CI, -5.3 to -0.4] services per 1000 beneficiaries) and lower rates of low-value thyroid testing (-40 [95% CI, -70 to -9] tests per 1000 beneficiaries) compared with low practice-level telehealth use. Of the other 6 outcomes examined, there was no association between practice-level telehealth use and rates of low-value care services.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cohort study of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries who received care from primary care practices in Michigan, some low-value care services (ie, cervical cancer screening among women older than 65 years and low-value thyroid testing) were lower among practices with high telehealth use, and there was no association between practice-level telehealth use in rates of most other low-value care services not delivered in the office. As telehealth continues to be an important part of care delivery, evaluating how it may encourage or discourage low-value care services is critical to understanding its impact on quality of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"7 11","pages":"e2445436"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11544489/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.45436","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: The rapid expansion of telehealth transformed how primary care practices deliver care; however, uncertainties about the quality of telehealth-delivered care compared with in-person care remain. While there are concerns that increased telehealth may introduce wasteful care, how telehealth affects the delivery of low-value care is unknown.

Objective: To examine whether a primary care practice's level of telehealth use is associated with changes in the rates of low-value care.

Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort study using a difference-in-differences study design was conducted from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2022, using Medicare fee-for-service claims data. Participants were Medicare beneficiaries attributed to primary care practices in Michigan.

Exposures: Low, medium, or high tertile of practice-level telehealth use.

Main outcomes and measures: Low-value care was assessed using 8 claims-based measures relevant to primary care, grouped into 4 main categories: office-based, laboratory-based, imaging-based, and mixed-modality services. Poisson regression models were used to estimate the association between practice-level telehealth use and rates of low-value care services, controlling for practice-level characteristics.

Results: A total of 577 928 beneficiaries (332 100 [57%] women; mean [SD] age, 76 [8] years) attributed to 2552 primary care practices were included in the study. After adjusting for practice-level characteristics and baseline differences in low-value care rates between telehealth use groups, high practice-level telehealth use was associated with lower rates of low-value cervical cancer screening (-2.9 [95% CI, -5.3 to -0.4] services per 1000 beneficiaries) and lower rates of low-value thyroid testing (-40 [95% CI, -70 to -9] tests per 1000 beneficiaries) compared with low practice-level telehealth use. Of the other 6 outcomes examined, there was no association between practice-level telehealth use and rates of low-value care services.

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries who received care from primary care practices in Michigan, some low-value care services (ie, cervical cancer screening among women older than 65 years and low-value thyroid testing) were lower among practices with high telehealth use, and there was no association between practice-level telehealth use in rates of most other low-value care services not delivered in the office. As telehealth continues to be an important part of care delivery, evaluating how it may encourage or discourage low-value care services is critical to understanding its impact on quality of care.

初级保健实践中远程保健的使用和低价值保健服务。
重要性:远程医疗的迅速发展改变了初级医疗实践提供医疗服务的方式;然而,与面对面医疗相比,远程医疗提供的医疗服务质量仍存在不确定性。虽然有人担心远程医疗的发展可能会造成医疗浪费,但远程医疗如何影响低价值医疗的提供仍是未知数:目的:研究初级医疗实践中远程医疗的使用水平是否与低价值医疗比率的变化有关:这项采用差异研究设计的回顾性队列研究于 2019 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日进行,使用的是医疗保险付费服务理赔数据。参与者为密歇根州初级医疗机构的医疗保险受益人:主要结果和测量指标:主要结果和测量方法:使用与初级医疗相关的 8 项基于索赔的测量方法对低价值医疗进行评估,这些测量方法分为 4 大类:基于诊室的服务、基于实验室的服务、基于成像的服务和混合模式服务。使用泊松回归模型来估计实践层面的远程医疗使用与低价值医疗服务率之间的关联,同时控制实践层面的特征:共有 577 928 名受益人(女性 332 100 [57%];平均 [SD] 年龄 76 [8]岁)被纳入研究,他们来自 2552 个初级医疗机构。在调整了实践水平特征和远程医疗使用组间低价值护理率的基线差异后,与实践水平低的远程医疗使用相比,实践水平高的远程医疗使用与较低的宫颈癌筛查率(每 1000 名受益人中-2.9 [95% CI, -5.3 to -0.4]服务)和较低的甲状腺检测率(每 1000 名受益人中-40 [95% CI, -70 to -9]检测)相关。在其他 6 项检查结果中,实践层面的远程医疗使用率与低价值医疗服务率之间没有关联:在这项针对密歇根州接受初级医疗服务的联邦医疗保险付费受益人的队列研究中,一些低价值医疗服务(即 65 岁以上女性的宫颈癌筛查和低价值甲状腺检测)在远程医疗使用率高的医疗机构中使用率较低,而医疗机构层面的远程医疗使用率与大多数其他非诊所提供的低价值医疗服务的使用率之间没有关联。随着远程医疗继续成为医疗服务的重要组成部分,评估其如何鼓励或阻止低价值医疗服务对于了解其对医疗质量的影响至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信