Age and Late Recurrence in Young Patients With ER-Positive, ERBB2-Negative Breast Cancer.

IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Dong Seung Shin, Janghee Lee, Eunhye Kang, Dasom Noh, Jong-Ho Cheun, Jun-Hee Lee, Yeongyeong Son, Soong June Bae, Seok Won Kim, Jeong Eon Lee, Jonghan Yu, Byung-Joo Chae, Sunyoung Kwon, Han-Byoel Lee, Sung Gwe Ahn, Jai Min Ryu
{"title":"Age and Late Recurrence in Young Patients With ER-Positive, ERBB2-Negative Breast Cancer.","authors":"Dong Seung Shin, Janghee Lee, Eunhye Kang, Dasom Noh, Jong-Ho Cheun, Jun-Hee Lee, Yeongyeong Son, Soong June Bae, Seok Won Kim, Jeong Eon Lee, Jonghan Yu, Byung-Joo Chae, Sunyoung Kwon, Han-Byoel Lee, Sung Gwe Ahn, Jai Min Ryu","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.42663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Young patients with breast cancer with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, ERBB2-negative tumors have a poor prognosis. Understanding factors influencing late recurrence is crucial for improving management and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether age is an independent factor associated with late distant recurrence (DR) in young patients with ER-positive, ERBB2-negative cancers without distant metastasis within 5 years from surgery.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This multicenter retrospective cohort study analyzed clinical records of patients with breast cancer who underwent surgery from January 2000 to December 2011 with at least 5 years of follow-up. The study was conducted at Samsung Medical Center, Gangnam Severance Hospital, and Seoul National University Hospital, including patients aged 45 years or younger with ER-positive, ERBB2-negative tumors, no DR within 5 years after surgery, no neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and at least 2 years of endocrine therapy. The data analysis period was from January 4, 2023, to March 21, 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Age, grouped as 21 to 35 years, 36 to 40 years, and 41 to 45 years.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the incidence of late DR at 5 to 10 years after surgery. Survival outcomes, including late distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), were evaluated in different age groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2772 patients included, 370 (13.3%) were aged 21 to 35 years, 885 (31.9%) were aged 36 to 40 years, and 1517 (54.7%) were aged 41 to 45 years. The median (range) follow-up was 10.8 (5.0-21.4) years. The youngest group had a poorer histologic grade (eg, histologic grade 3: 107 patients aged 21-35 years [28.9%]; 149 patients aged 36-40 years [16.8%]; 273 patients aged 41-45 years [18.0%]) and more frequent chemotherapy (307 patients aged 21-35 years [83.0%]; 697 patients aged 36-40 years [78.8%]; 1111 patients aged 41-45 years [73.2%]). The youngest patients had significantly worse rates of locoregional recurrence-free survival (patients aged 21-35 years, 90.1% [95% CI, 86.8%-93.3%]; patients aged 36-40 years, 94.6% [95% CI, 93.0%-96.2%]; patients aged 41-45 years, 97.7% [95% CI, 96.9%-98.5%]), disease-free survival (patients aged 21-35 years, 79.3% [95% CI, 75.0%-83.9%]; patients aged 36-40 years, 88.7% [95% CI, 86.5%-91.0%]; patients aged 41-45 years, 94.4% [95% CI, 93.2%-95.7%]), and late DMFS (patients aged 21-35 years, 89.3% [95% CI, 86.0%-92.9%]; patients aged 36-40 years: 94.2% [95% CI, 92.5%-95.9%]; patients aged 41-45 years: 97.2% [95% CI, 96.3%-98.1%]) but not overall survival (patients aged 21-35 years, 96.9% [95% CI, 95.0%-98.9%]; patients aged 36-40 years, 98.2% [95% CI, 97.2%-99.2%]; patients aged 41-45 years, 98.9% [95% CI, 98.3%-99.5%]). Multivariable analysis showed lower hazard for late DR in the older groups compared with the youngest group (age 36-40 years: hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.34-0.82; P = .001; age 41-45 years: hazard ratio, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.20-0.47; P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, age was an independent factor associated with late DR in young patients with ER-positive, ERBB2-negative breast cancer. Younger age was associated with worse locoregional recurrence-free survival, disease-free survival, and late DMFS, highlighting the importance of long-term monitoring and potential for personalized treatment approaches based on age, particularly for younger patients with ER-positive, ERBB2-negative breast cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"7 11","pages":"e2442663"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11544499/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.42663","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Young patients with breast cancer with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, ERBB2-negative tumors have a poor prognosis. Understanding factors influencing late recurrence is crucial for improving management and outcomes.

Objective: To determine whether age is an independent factor associated with late distant recurrence (DR) in young patients with ER-positive, ERBB2-negative cancers without distant metastasis within 5 years from surgery.

Design, setting, and participants: This multicenter retrospective cohort study analyzed clinical records of patients with breast cancer who underwent surgery from January 2000 to December 2011 with at least 5 years of follow-up. The study was conducted at Samsung Medical Center, Gangnam Severance Hospital, and Seoul National University Hospital, including patients aged 45 years or younger with ER-positive, ERBB2-negative tumors, no DR within 5 years after surgery, no neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and at least 2 years of endocrine therapy. The data analysis period was from January 4, 2023, to March 21, 2024.

Exposure: Age, grouped as 21 to 35 years, 36 to 40 years, and 41 to 45 years.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was the incidence of late DR at 5 to 10 years after surgery. Survival outcomes, including late distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), were evaluated in different age groups.

Results: Among 2772 patients included, 370 (13.3%) were aged 21 to 35 years, 885 (31.9%) were aged 36 to 40 years, and 1517 (54.7%) were aged 41 to 45 years. The median (range) follow-up was 10.8 (5.0-21.4) years. The youngest group had a poorer histologic grade (eg, histologic grade 3: 107 patients aged 21-35 years [28.9%]; 149 patients aged 36-40 years [16.8%]; 273 patients aged 41-45 years [18.0%]) and more frequent chemotherapy (307 patients aged 21-35 years [83.0%]; 697 patients aged 36-40 years [78.8%]; 1111 patients aged 41-45 years [73.2%]). The youngest patients had significantly worse rates of locoregional recurrence-free survival (patients aged 21-35 years, 90.1% [95% CI, 86.8%-93.3%]; patients aged 36-40 years, 94.6% [95% CI, 93.0%-96.2%]; patients aged 41-45 years, 97.7% [95% CI, 96.9%-98.5%]), disease-free survival (patients aged 21-35 years, 79.3% [95% CI, 75.0%-83.9%]; patients aged 36-40 years, 88.7% [95% CI, 86.5%-91.0%]; patients aged 41-45 years, 94.4% [95% CI, 93.2%-95.7%]), and late DMFS (patients aged 21-35 years, 89.3% [95% CI, 86.0%-92.9%]; patients aged 36-40 years: 94.2% [95% CI, 92.5%-95.9%]; patients aged 41-45 years: 97.2% [95% CI, 96.3%-98.1%]) but not overall survival (patients aged 21-35 years, 96.9% [95% CI, 95.0%-98.9%]; patients aged 36-40 years, 98.2% [95% CI, 97.2%-99.2%]; patients aged 41-45 years, 98.9% [95% CI, 98.3%-99.5%]). Multivariable analysis showed lower hazard for late DR in the older groups compared with the youngest group (age 36-40 years: hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.34-0.82; P = .001; age 41-45 years: hazard ratio, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.20-0.47; P < .001).

Conclusions and relevance: In this retrospective cohort study, age was an independent factor associated with late DR in young patients with ER-positive, ERBB2-negative breast cancer. Younger age was associated with worse locoregional recurrence-free survival, disease-free survival, and late DMFS, highlighting the importance of long-term monitoring and potential for personalized treatment approaches based on age, particularly for younger patients with ER-positive, ERBB2-negative breast cancer.

ER阳性、ERBB2阴性年轻乳腺癌患者的年龄与晚期复发
重要性:雌激素受体(ER)阳性、ERBB2阴性的年轻乳腺癌患者预后较差。了解影响晚期复发的因素对于改善管理和预后至关重要:目的:确定年龄是否是与ER阳性、ERBB2阴性、术后5年内无远处转移的年轻癌症患者晚期远处复发(DR)相关的独立因素:这项多中心回顾性队列研究分析了 2000 年 1 月至 2011 年 12 月期间接受手术治疗且随访至少 5 年的乳腺癌患者的临床记录。研究在三星医疗中心、江南Severance医院和首尔大学医院进行,包括年龄在45岁或以下、ER阳性、ERBB2阴性、术后5年内无DR、无新辅助化疗、至少接受过2年内分泌治疗的患者。数据分析期为 2023 年 1 月 4 日至 2024 年 3 月 21 日:年龄:21至35岁、36至40岁、41至45岁:主要结果是术后5至10年的晚期DR发生率。对不同年龄组的生存结果(包括晚期无远处转移生存率(DMFS))进行了评估:在纳入的2772名患者中,370人(13.3%)的年龄在21至35岁之间,885人(31.9%)的年龄在36至40岁之间,1517人(54.7%)的年龄在41至45岁之间。随访时间的中位数(范围)为 10.8(5.0-21.4)年。最年轻组患者的组织学分级较差(例如,组织学分级 3 级:21-35 岁患者 107 例 [28.9%];36-40 岁患者 149 例 [16.8%];41-45 岁患者 273 例 [18.0%]),化疗次数较多(21-35 岁患者 307 例 [83.0%];36-40 岁患者 697 例 [78.8%];41-45 岁患者 1111 例 [73.2%])。最年轻患者的无局部复发生存率(21-35 岁患者,90.1% [95% CI, 86.8%-93.3%]; 36-40 岁患者,94.6% [95% CI, 93.0%-96.2%]; 41-45 岁患者,97.7% [95% CI, 96.9%-98.5%])、无病生存期(21-35 岁患者,79.3% [95% CI,75.0%-83.9%];36-40 岁患者,88.7% [95% CI,86.5%-91.0%];41-45 岁患者,94.4% [95% CI,93.2%-95.7%])和晚期 DMFS(21-35 岁患者,89.3% [95% CI,86.0%-92.9%];36-40 岁患者,94.2% [95% CI,93.2%-95.7%]):94.2%[95%CI,92.5%-95.9%];41-45 岁患者:97.2%[95%CI,92.5%-95.9%]:总生存率(21-35 岁患者:96.9% [95% CI,95.0%-98.9%];36-40 岁患者:98.2% [95% CI,97.2%-99.2%];41-45 岁患者:98.9% [95% CI,98.3%-99.5%])。多变量分析显示,与最年轻的组别相比,年龄较大的组别发生晚期 DR 的风险较低(36-40 岁:风险比,0.53;95% CI,0.34-0.82;P = .001;41-45 岁:风险比,0.30;95% CI,0.20-0.47;P 结论及意义:在这项回顾性队列研究中,年龄是与ER阳性、ERBB2阴性的年轻乳腺癌患者晚期DR相关的一个独立因素。较小的年龄与较差的无局部复发生存率、无疾病生存率和晚期DMFS相关,突出了长期监测的重要性以及根据年龄采取个性化治疗方法的可能性,尤其是对于ER阳性、ERBB2阴性的年轻乳腺癌患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信