Religiosity, Spirituality, Meaning-Making, and Suicidality in Psychiatric Patients and Suicide Attempters: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Bart van den Brink, Rianne Roodnat, Ralph C A Rippe, Aaron D Cherniak, Kenny van Lieshout, Sanne G Helder, Arjan W Braam, Hanneke Schaap-Jonker
{"title":"Religiosity, Spirituality, Meaning-Making, and Suicidality in Psychiatric Patients and Suicide Attempters: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Bart van den Brink, Rianne Roodnat, Ralph C A Rippe, Aaron D Cherniak, Kenny van Lieshout, Sanne G Helder, Arjan W Braam, Hanneke Schaap-Jonker","doi":"10.1097/HRP.0000000000000409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Learning objective: </strong>After participating in this CME activity, the psychiatrist should be better able to:• Explain current understanding of how religiosity, spirituality, and meaning-making (R/S/M) affect patients with psychiatric diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>R/S/M generally protect against suicidality and suicide. Thus far, reviews on the topic have largely been descriptive, and there are no meta-analyses focused on psychiatric patients. This study systematically evaluates all empirical evidence on R/S/M's potential influences on suicidality for psychiatric patients and recent suicide attempters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic PROSPERO preregistered search following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol was performed in MEDLINE and PsycInfo. Quantitative studies until 31 December 2022 on R/S/M and suicidality in psychiatric populations and recent suicide attempters were selected; psychological autopsy studies were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 4,374 studies for screening. This resulted in 108 eligible studies for the systematic review and 75 studies for the meta-analysis, including 231 effect sizes (ES) and 17,561 subjects. Research focused mainly on the emotional, moral, and ritual aspects of R/S/M. Most research was cross-sectional; repeated R/S/M assessments were rarely reported. A combined significant and negative ES (Fisher Z = -0.13, p = .006, equivalent to Cohen's d = -0.26) was found for all good- and fair-quality studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, R/S/M was associated with lowering suicidality. Maladaptive-distressing dimensions of R/S/M correlated with higher rates of suicidality (e.g., religious struggles). The explanatory value was limited by the predominantly cross-sectional nature of ESs.</p><p><strong>Registration and funding: </strong>PROSPERO registration 2023 CRD42023398692; there was no funding involved.</p>","PeriodicalId":12915,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Review of Psychiatry","volume":"32 6","pages":"195-206"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard Review of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HRP.0000000000000409","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Learning objective: After participating in this CME activity, the psychiatrist should be better able to:• Explain current understanding of how religiosity, spirituality, and meaning-making (R/S/M) affect patients with psychiatric diagnoses.

Introduction: R/S/M generally protect against suicidality and suicide. Thus far, reviews on the topic have largely been descriptive, and there are no meta-analyses focused on psychiatric patients. This study systematically evaluates all empirical evidence on R/S/M's potential influences on suicidality for psychiatric patients and recent suicide attempters.

Methods: A systematic PROSPERO preregistered search following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol was performed in MEDLINE and PsycInfo. Quantitative studies until 31 December 2022 on R/S/M and suicidality in psychiatric populations and recent suicide attempters were selected; psychological autopsy studies were excluded.

Results: The search identified 4,374 studies for screening. This resulted in 108 eligible studies for the systematic review and 75 studies for the meta-analysis, including 231 effect sizes (ES) and 17,561 subjects. Research focused mainly on the emotional, moral, and ritual aspects of R/S/M. Most research was cross-sectional; repeated R/S/M assessments were rarely reported. A combined significant and negative ES (Fisher Z = -0.13, p = .006, equivalent to Cohen's d = -0.26) was found for all good- and fair-quality studies.

Conclusion: Overall, R/S/M was associated with lowering suicidality. Maladaptive-distressing dimensions of R/S/M correlated with higher rates of suicidality (e.g., religious struggles). The explanatory value was limited by the predominantly cross-sectional nature of ESs.

Registration and funding: PROSPERO registration 2023 CRD42023398692; there was no funding involved.

精神病患者和自杀企图者的宗教信仰、精神信仰、意义建构与自杀倾向:系统回顾与元分析》。
学习目标:参加本次继续医学教育活动后,精神科医生应能更好地:- 解释当前对宗教性、灵性和意义建构(R/S/M)如何影响精神科诊断患者的理解:宗教信仰、灵性和意义建构(R/S/M)通常可以预防自杀和自杀倾向。迄今为止,有关这一主题的综述大多是描述性的,还没有针对精神病患者的荟萃分析。本研究系统地评估了所有关于R/S/M对精神病患者和近期自杀未遂者自杀倾向的潜在影响的实证证据:方法:在 MEDLINE 和 PsycInfo 中按照《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》协议进行了系统的 PROSPERO 预注册检索。研究选取了截至 2022 年 12 月 31 日有关精神病患者和近期自杀未遂者的 R/S/M 和自杀倾向的定量研究;排除了心理尸检研究:结果:搜索发现了 4,374 项研究可供筛选。结果:共筛选出 4,374 项研究,其中 108 项符合系统综述的要求,75 项符合荟萃分析的要求,包括 231 个效应大小 (ES) 和 17,561 名受试者。研究主要集中在 R/S/M 的情感、道德和仪式方面。大多数研究为横断面研究,很少有重复进行 R/S/M 评估的报告。在所有质量良好和质量一般的研究中,均发现了综合显着的负ES(Fisher Z = -0.13, p = .006,相当于Cohen's d = -0.26):总的来说,R/S/M 与降低自杀率有关。R/S/M的适应性-压力维度与较高的自杀率相关(如宗教斗争)。由于ESs主要是横断面性质,其解释价值受到限制:PROSPERO注册号2023 CRD42023398692;未涉及任何资金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Harvard Review of Psychiatry is the authoritative source for scholarly reviews and perspectives on important topics in psychiatry. Founded by the Harvard Medical School''s Department of Psychiatry, the Harvard Review of Psychiatry features review papers that summarize and synthesize the key literature in a scholarly and clinically relevant manner. Topics covered include: Schizophrenia and related disorders; Mood disorders; Personality disorders; Substance use disorders; Anxiety; Neuroscience; Psychosocial aspects of psychiatry; Ethics; Psychiatric education; and much more. In addition, a Clinical Challenges section presents a case with discussion from a panel of experts. Brief reviews are presented in topic-specific columns that include Cross-Cultural Psychiatry, History of Psychiatry, Ethics, and others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信