Infrared thermography: An investigative tool for detection of subclinical bleed in hemophilia on prophylaxis.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Moupali Ghosh, Jyoti Shaw, Anjan K Dasgupta, Maitreyee Bhattacharyya
{"title":"Infrared thermography: An investigative tool for detection of subclinical bleed in hemophilia on prophylaxis.","authors":"Moupali Ghosh, Jyoti Shaw, Anjan K Dasgupta, Maitreyee Bhattacharyya","doi":"10.25259/ijmr_596_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background & objectives Subclinical joint bleed is a matter of concern in individuals with hemophilia on prophylaxis. Ultrasonography (USG) is mostly used for the screening of subclinical bleeds in such individuals but it has its own limitations. Thus a more comprehensive technology is required for the detection of the same. This study undertook to evaluate the efficacy of infrared thermography (IRT) for detection of subclinical joint bleeds and its comparison with ultrasonography and MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging), considering MRI as the gold standard. Methods Forty eight asymptomatic individuals with hemophiliacs on prophylaxis and 15 healthy males as controls were recruited. IRT, USG and MRI were done in all participants included in the study. FLIR camera systems were used for the capture of thermograms of the joints in both the study groups. Results The mean of maximum temperature difference>0.5K (ΔT max >0.5K) as compared to a healthy joint was considered as significant. Subclinical bleeds were detected in 23.9, 7.29 and 27.08 per cent participants by IRT, USG and MRI respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of IRT and USG was detected to be 88.4 and 97.67 per cent, and 26.9 and 99 per cent, respectively. Interpretation & conclusions The findings of this study suggest that IRT is an effective tool for detection of subclinical joint bleeds in individuals with hemophilia and can be used for the monitoring of the joints in such individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":13349,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Medical Research","volume":"160 2","pages":"210-216"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11544572/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/ijmr_596_23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & objectives Subclinical joint bleed is a matter of concern in individuals with hemophilia on prophylaxis. Ultrasonography (USG) is mostly used for the screening of subclinical bleeds in such individuals but it has its own limitations. Thus a more comprehensive technology is required for the detection of the same. This study undertook to evaluate the efficacy of infrared thermography (IRT) for detection of subclinical joint bleeds and its comparison with ultrasonography and MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging), considering MRI as the gold standard. Methods Forty eight asymptomatic individuals with hemophiliacs on prophylaxis and 15 healthy males as controls were recruited. IRT, USG and MRI were done in all participants included in the study. FLIR camera systems were used for the capture of thermograms of the joints in both the study groups. Results The mean of maximum temperature difference>0.5K (ΔT max >0.5K) as compared to a healthy joint was considered as significant. Subclinical bleeds were detected in 23.9, 7.29 and 27.08 per cent participants by IRT, USG and MRI respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of IRT and USG was detected to be 88.4 and 97.67 per cent, and 26.9 and 99 per cent, respectively. Interpretation & conclusions The findings of this study suggest that IRT is an effective tool for detection of subclinical joint bleeds in individuals with hemophilia and can be used for the monitoring of the joints in such individuals.

红外热成像:检测血友病预防性亚临床出血的调查工具。
背景与目的 亚临床关节出血是血友病患者预防性治疗中需要关注的问题。超声波检查(USG)主要用于筛查此类患者的亚临床出血,但它有自身的局限性。因此,需要一种更全面的技术来检测亚临床出血。本研究旨在评估红外热成像(IRT)检测亚临床关节出血的功效,并将其与超声波和核磁共振成像(MRI)进行比较,同时将核磁共振成像视为金标准。方法 招募 48 名无症状的血友病预防患者和 15 名健康男性作为对照组。对所有参与研究者进行了 IRT、USG 和 MRI 检查。两个研究组都使用了 FLIR 相机系统拍摄关节热图。结果 与健康关节相比,最大温差>0.5K(ΔT max >0.5K)的平均值被认为是显著的。通过 IRT、USG 和 MRI 发现的亚临床出血率分别为 23.9%、7.29% 和 27.08%。IRT 和 USG 的敏感性和特异性分别为 88.4% 和 97.67%,以及 26.9% 和 99%。解释与结论 本研究结果表明,IRT 是检测血友病患者亚临床关节出血的有效工具,可用于监测此类患者的关节情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.40%
发文量
191
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Medical Research (IJMR) [ISSN 0971-5916] is one of the oldest medical Journals not only in India, but probably in Asia, as it started in the year 1913. The Journal was started as a quarterly (4 issues/year) in 1913 and made bimonthly (6 issues/year) in 1958. It became monthly (12 issues/year) in the year 1964.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信