Assessment of quality of life in follow-up patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: A prospective, observational study from a tertiary care center.

Q3 Medicine

International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-20 DOI:10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_29_24

Tatikonda Chandra Mouli, Rupali Patnaik, Samir Samal, Shakti Bedanta Mishra

{"title":"Assessment of quality of life in follow-up patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: A prospective, observational study from a tertiary care center.","authors":"Tatikonda Chandra Mouli, Rupali Patnaik, Samir Samal, Shakti Bedanta Mishra","doi":"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_29_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study intended to assess the quality of life (QOL) with telephonic interview using the Short Form 12 (SF-12) Scale in follow-up patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with COVID-19 pneumonia.Methods: This prospective, noninterventional follow-up study was conducted at a tertiary care center. COVID-19 pneumonia patients discharged from ICU were recruited for telephonic interviews. Interviews were performed using SF-12 Scale to assess QOL 6 months after discharge. The SF-12 survey measures general health status in eight domains. A radar chart was used for the interpretation of health component scores.Results: One hundred and fifty patients could complete the telephonic interview. The first-stage depression risk was 50%, which was 30% more than general position incidence (20%). As compared to the general population, physical component summary (PCS-12) was 60% below and mental component summary (MCS-12) was 67% below the general norm. Role emotional was the most affected followed by role physical.Conclusions: QOL in follow-up ICU patients with COVID-19 pneumonia was worse in terms of physical and mental scores. By employing a comprehensive, longitudinal assessment of QOL in follow-up patients, using validated SF-12 Scale, this study captures a multifaceted view of their health status postrecovery.","PeriodicalId":13938,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","volume":"14 3","pages":"147-152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540191/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_29_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study intended to assess the quality of life (QOL) with telephonic interview using the Short Form 12 (SF-12) Scale in follow-up patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with COVID-19 pneumonia.

Methods: This prospective, noninterventional follow-up study was conducted at a tertiary care center. COVID-19 pneumonia patients discharged from ICU were recruited for telephonic interviews. Interviews were performed using SF-12 Scale to assess QOL 6 months after discharge. The SF-12 survey measures general health status in eight domains. A radar chart was used for the interpretation of health component scores.

Results: One hundred and fifty patients could complete the telephonic interview. The first-stage depression risk was 50%, which was 30% more than general position incidence (20%). As compared to the general population, physical component summary (PCS-12) was 60% below and mental component summary (MCS-12) was 67% below the general norm. Role emotional was the most affected followed by role physical.

Conclusions: QOL in follow-up ICU patients with COVID-19 pneumonia was worse in terms of physical and mental scores. By employing a comprehensive, longitudinal assessment of QOL in follow-up patients, using validated SF-12 Scale, this study captures a multifaceted view of their health status postrecovery.

查看原文本刊更多论文

COVID-19 肺炎随访患者的生活质量评估：来自一家三级医疗中心的前瞻性观察研究。

研究背景本研究旨在使用简表 12（SF-12）量表对入住重症监护室（ICU）的 COVID-19 肺炎患者进行电话访谈，评估其生活质量（QOL）：这项前瞻性、非干预性随访研究在一家三级医疗中心进行。从重症监护室出院的 COVID-19 肺炎患者接受了电话访谈。访谈使用 SF-12 量表评估出院 6 个月后的 QOL。SF-12 调查从八个方面测量一般健康状况。采用雷达图来解释健康成分得分：结果：150 名患者完成了电话访谈。第一阶段抑郁风险为 50%，比一般情况下的发病率（20%）高出 30%。与普通人群相比，患者的身体状况（PCS-12）比一般标准低 60%，精神状况（MCS-12）比一般标准低 67%。受影响最大的是角色情感，其次是角色身体：结论：COVID-19 肺炎重症监护病房随访患者的 QOL 在身体和心理评分方面均较差。通过使用有效的 SF-12 量表对随访患者的 QOL 进行全面、纵向评估，该研究从多方面反映了患者康复后的健康状况。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science Medicine-Emergency Medicine

CiteScore

1.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： IJCIIS encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the field of Critical Illness and Injury Science across the world thus promoting translational research by striking a synergy between basic science, clinical medicine and public health. The Journal intends to bring together scientists and academicians in the emergency intensive care and promote translational synergy between Laboratory Science, Clinical Medicine and Public Health. The Journal invites Original Articles, Clinical Investigations, Epidemiological Analysis, Data Protocols, Case Reports, Clinical Photographs, review articles and special commentaries. Students, Residents, Academicians, Public Health experts and scientists are all encouraged to be a part of this initiative by contributing, reviewing and promoting scientific works and science.