Prospective observational study to measure the incidence of chest pain and its association with perioperative factors among parturients undergoing lower segment cesarean section with subarachnoid blocks.

Q3 Medicine
Soumya Sankar Nath, Sandeep Kumar, Nandhini Nachimuthu, Kavya Sindhu, Deepti Sharma, Preeti Priya
{"title":"Prospective observational study to measure the incidence of chest pain and its association with perioperative factors among parturients undergoing lower segment cesarean section with subarachnoid blocks.","authors":"Soumya Sankar Nath, Sandeep Kumar, Nandhini Nachimuthu, Kavya Sindhu, Deepti Sharma, Preeti Priya","doi":"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_22_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intraoperative chest pain is common in parturients undergoing lower segment cesarean section (LSCS) with subarachnoid block (SAB). The study aimed to quantify the incidence of intraoperative chest pain after oxytocin in patients undergoing LSCS with SAB and to find out its association with relevant factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consenting parturients undergoing LSCS with SAB were recruited. Those who had any cardiac disease, altered sensorium, had the suboptimal effect of SAB, or needed the use of any other anesthetic agent or additional uterotonic were excluded. Chest pain was graded as follows: Grade 1 - Patient lifted shoulder without restlessness, Grade 2 - Patient lifted shoulder with restlessness, Grade 3 - Patient explicitly complained of chest pain, and Grade 4 - Patient complained of chest pain with desaturation or hypotension or both.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2086 subjects recruited, 4.84% had chest discomfort/pain. The age and the volume of bupivacaine used in SAB were comparable between the groups who had chest pain and those without. Thirty-five (34.65%), 18 (17.82%), 21 (20.8%), and 27 (26.73%) patients had Grade 1, 2, 3, and 4 chest pain/discomfort, respectively. Logistic regression analysis showed that with an increase in age by 1 unit, the odds of chest pain decreased by 1%. With an increase in parity by one, the odds of chest pain decreased by 8%, while those who did not have comorbidities had 11.7% less odds of occurrence of chest pain than those with comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study reliably measured the incidence and characteristics of chest pain/discomfort following oxytocin during LSCS under SAB and its association with relevant factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":13938,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","volume":"14 3","pages":"137-142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540186/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_22_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intraoperative chest pain is common in parturients undergoing lower segment cesarean section (LSCS) with subarachnoid block (SAB). The study aimed to quantify the incidence of intraoperative chest pain after oxytocin in patients undergoing LSCS with SAB and to find out its association with relevant factors.

Methods: Consenting parturients undergoing LSCS with SAB were recruited. Those who had any cardiac disease, altered sensorium, had the suboptimal effect of SAB, or needed the use of any other anesthetic agent or additional uterotonic were excluded. Chest pain was graded as follows: Grade 1 - Patient lifted shoulder without restlessness, Grade 2 - Patient lifted shoulder with restlessness, Grade 3 - Patient explicitly complained of chest pain, and Grade 4 - Patient complained of chest pain with desaturation or hypotension or both.

Results: Of 2086 subjects recruited, 4.84% had chest discomfort/pain. The age and the volume of bupivacaine used in SAB were comparable between the groups who had chest pain and those without. Thirty-five (34.65%), 18 (17.82%), 21 (20.8%), and 27 (26.73%) patients had Grade 1, 2, 3, and 4 chest pain/discomfort, respectively. Logistic regression analysis showed that with an increase in age by 1 unit, the odds of chest pain decreased by 1%. With an increase in parity by one, the odds of chest pain decreased by 8%, while those who did not have comorbidities had 11.7% less odds of occurrence of chest pain than those with comorbidities.

Conclusion: The study reliably measured the incidence and characteristics of chest pain/discomfort following oxytocin during LSCS under SAB and its association with relevant factors.

前瞻性观察研究旨在测量接受蛛网膜下腔阻滞下段剖宫产术的产妇的胸痛发生率及其与围手术期因素的关系。
背景:在接受蛛网膜下腔阻滞(SAB)的下段剖宫产术(LSCS)的产妇中,术中胸痛很常见。本研究旨在量化接受蛛网膜下腔阻滞 LSCS 的患者术中使用催产素后胸痛的发生率,并找出其与相关因素的关系:方法:招募同意接受 LSCS 和 SAB 的产妇。排除患有任何心脏疾病、感觉改变、SAB效果不佳或需要使用任何其他麻醉剂或额外子宫收缩剂的患者。胸痛分级如下1级--患者抬起肩膀时无躁动;2级--患者抬起肩膀时有躁动;3级--患者明确主诉胸痛;4级--患者主诉胸痛伴有血饱和度降低或低血压或两者兼有:在招募的 2086 名受试者中,4.84% 的人有胸部不适/疼痛。胸痛组和无胸痛组的年龄和布比卡因用量相当。分别有 35(34.65%)、18(17.82%)、21(20.8%)和 27(26.73%)名患者出现 1、2、3 和 4 级胸痛/不适。逻辑回归分析表明,年龄每增加一个单位,胸痛的几率就会降低 1%。结论:该研究可靠地测量了胸痛/不适的发生率,并对其进行了分析:该研究可靠地测量了在 SAB 下进行 LSCS 时使用催产素后胸痛/不适的发生率和特征及其与相关因素的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: IJCIIS encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the field of Critical Illness and Injury Science across the world thus promoting translational research by striking a synergy between basic science, clinical medicine and public health. The Journal intends to bring together scientists and academicians in the emergency intensive care and promote translational synergy between Laboratory Science, Clinical Medicine and Public Health. The Journal invites Original Articles, Clinical Investigations, Epidemiological Analysis, Data Protocols, Case Reports, Clinical Photographs, review articles and special commentaries. Students, Residents, Academicians, Public Health experts and scientists are all encouraged to be a part of this initiative by contributing, reviewing and promoting scientific works and science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信