Advancing source apportionment of soil potentially toxic elements using a hybrid model: a case study in urban parks, Beijing, China.

IF 3.2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Kai Li, Guanghui Guo, Shiqi Chen, Mei Lei, Long Zhao, Tienan Ju, Jinlong Zhang
{"title":"Advancing source apportionment of soil potentially toxic elements using a hybrid model: a case study in urban parks, Beijing, China.","authors":"Kai Li, Guanghui Guo, Shiqi Chen, Mei Lei, Long Zhao, Tienan Ju, Jinlong Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s10653-024-02273-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Identifying the source-specific health risks of potentially toxic elements (PTE) in urban park soils is essential for human health protection. However, previous studies have mostly focused on the deterministic source-specific health risks, ignoring the health risk assessment from a probabilistic perspective. To fill this gap, we developed a hybrid model that incorporated machine learning (ML) interpretability into positive matrix factorization (PMF) and probability health risk assessment (PHRA) based on the Monte Carlo simulation. The results indicated that concentrations of soil PTEs except for Mn and Sb were significantly higher than their corresponding background values. Random forest (RF) was regarded as the best ML model to identify key drivers for As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn, with R<sup>2</sup> > 0.60, but was less effective for other soil PTEs (R<sup>2</sup> < 0.49). Specifically, the contributions of the four potential pollution sources were mixed sources, traffic emission, fuel combustion, and building materials, with contribution rate of 24.88%, 30.56%, 28.99%, and 15.56%, respectively. Fuel combustion contributed the most to non-carcinogenic for children (39.45%), male (43.84%), and female (43.76%), and the non-carcinogenic risk could be considered negligible for human. However, building materials was the major contributor to carcinogenic risk for children (36.1%), male (44.9%), and female (43.2%). The integration of the RF model with PMF and PHRA improved the accuracy of the results by identifying and quantifying the specific sources of each soil PTE using the relative importance analysis from the RF model. The results of this study assisted in providing efficient strategies for risk management and control of soil PTEs in Beijing parks.</p>","PeriodicalId":11759,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Geochemistry and Health","volume":"46 12","pages":"501"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Geochemistry and Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-024-02273-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Identifying the source-specific health risks of potentially toxic elements (PTE) in urban park soils is essential for human health protection. However, previous studies have mostly focused on the deterministic source-specific health risks, ignoring the health risk assessment from a probabilistic perspective. To fill this gap, we developed a hybrid model that incorporated machine learning (ML) interpretability into positive matrix factorization (PMF) and probability health risk assessment (PHRA) based on the Monte Carlo simulation. The results indicated that concentrations of soil PTEs except for Mn and Sb were significantly higher than their corresponding background values. Random forest (RF) was regarded as the best ML model to identify key drivers for As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn, with R2 > 0.60, but was less effective for other soil PTEs (R2 < 0.49). Specifically, the contributions of the four potential pollution sources were mixed sources, traffic emission, fuel combustion, and building materials, with contribution rate of 24.88%, 30.56%, 28.99%, and 15.56%, respectively. Fuel combustion contributed the most to non-carcinogenic for children (39.45%), male (43.84%), and female (43.76%), and the non-carcinogenic risk could be considered negligible for human. However, building materials was the major contributor to carcinogenic risk for children (36.1%), male (44.9%), and female (43.2%). The integration of the RF model with PMF and PHRA improved the accuracy of the results by identifying and quantifying the specific sources of each soil PTE using the relative importance analysis from the RF model. The results of this study assisted in providing efficient strategies for risk management and control of soil PTEs in Beijing parks.

利用混合模型推进土壤潜在有毒元素的来源分配:中国北京城市公园案例研究。
确定城市公园土壤中潜在有毒元素(PTE)的特定来源健康风险对于保护人类健康至关重要。然而,以往的研究大多侧重于确定性的特定来源健康风险,而忽略了从概率角度进行健康风险评估。为了填补这一空白,我们开发了一种混合模型,将机器学习(ML)可解释性融入正矩阵因式分解(PMF)和基于蒙特卡罗模拟的概率健康风险评估(PHRA)。结果表明,除锰和锑外,土壤中其他 PTEs 的浓度明显高于其相应的背景值。随机森林(RF)被认为是识别 As、Cd、Cr、Cu、Ni、Pb 和 Zn 关键驱动因素的最佳 ML 模型,R2 > 0.60,但对其他土壤 PTEs 的效果较差(R2 < 0.49)。具体而言,四种潜在污染源的贡献率分别为混合源、交通排放、燃料燃烧和建筑材料,贡献率分别为 24.88%、30.56%、28.99% 和 15.56%。燃料燃烧对儿童(39.45%)、男性(43.84%)和女性(43.76%)的非致癌影响最大,对人类的非致癌风险可以忽略不计。然而,建筑材料是导致儿童(36.1%)、男性(44.9%)和女性(43.2%)致癌风险的主要因素。射频模型与 PMF 和 PHRA 的整合提高了结果的准确性,利用射频模型的相对重要性分析确定和量化了每种土壤 PTE 的具体来源。研究结果有助于为北京公园土壤 PTE 的风险管理和控制提供有效策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Geochemistry and Health
Environmental Geochemistry and Health 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
279
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Geochemistry and Health publishes original research papers and review papers across the broad field of environmental geochemistry. Environmental geochemistry and health establishes and explains links between the natural or disturbed chemical composition of the earth’s surface and the health of plants, animals and people. Beneficial elements regulate or promote enzymatic and hormonal activity whereas other elements may be toxic. Bedrock geochemistry controls the composition of soil and hence that of water and vegetation. Environmental issues, such as pollution, arising from the extraction and use of mineral resources, are discussed. The effects of contaminants introduced into the earth’s geochemical systems are examined. Geochemical surveys of soil, water and plants show how major and trace elements are distributed geographically. Associated epidemiological studies reveal the possibility of causal links between the natural or disturbed geochemical environment and disease. Experimental research illuminates the nature or consequences of natural or disturbed geochemical processes. The journal particularly welcomes novel research linking environmental geochemistry and health issues on such topics as: heavy metals (including mercury), persistent organic pollutants (POPs), and mixed chemicals emitted through human activities, such as uncontrolled recycling of electronic-waste; waste recycling; surface-atmospheric interaction processes (natural and anthropogenic emissions, vertical transport, deposition, and physical-chemical interaction) of gases and aerosols; phytoremediation/restoration of contaminated sites; food contamination and safety; environmental effects of medicines; effects and toxicity of mixed pollutants; speciation of heavy metals/metalloids; effects of mining; disturbed geochemistry from human behavior, natural or man-made hazards; particle and nanoparticle toxicology; risk and the vulnerability of populations, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信