"Do You Yourself Have Any Idea What is Going On?": Invitations for Lay Diagnosis in Dutch Primary Care Physiotherapy.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Lourens E Kraft van Ermel, Jana H M Declercq, Mike Huiskes
{"title":"\"Do You Yourself Have Any Idea What is Going On?\": Invitations for Lay Diagnosis in Dutch Primary Care Physiotherapy.","authors":"Lourens E Kraft van Ermel, Jana H M Declercq, Mike Huiskes","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2024.2423115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lay perspectives are important in the recovery of patients with nonspecific pain as they influence levels of pain and patients' pain experiences. Although previous interactional research has focused on patients' unsolicited attempts to share their perspectives, health professions also employ specific techniques to solicit them. Physiotherapists are recommended to assess lay perspectives and include them in treatment. One way to do so is through invitations for lay diagnosis (this paper). However, little is known about how lay perspectives are constructed through these invitations and how physiotherapists follow up on them. In this study, physiotherapy intakes were analyzed using conversation analysis. We found that invitations for lay diagnosis are frequently embedded in previous health care visits or patients' knowledge gathering activities. Patients often express low epistemic status when they construct their lay perspectives and engage in lay diagnostic activity in response to these invitations. Additionally, physiotherapists' responses in the third position, such as follow-up questions, may influence the further development of patients' lay perspectives. These invitations provide patients an opportunity to share their views on their health issues, but also create an interactional challenge due to the reversal of usual epistemic dynamics. The study highlights the complexity of doing lay diagnosis, which can include diagnoses or explanations of varying specificity. The specificity and elaboration of these perspectives are influenced by the physiotherapists' subsequent responses. We provide recommendations for healthcare professionals to facilitate lay diagnosis, and our findings contribute to the discussion around patient empowerment, shared decision making, and patient centered care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2024.2423115","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lay perspectives are important in the recovery of patients with nonspecific pain as they influence levels of pain and patients' pain experiences. Although previous interactional research has focused on patients' unsolicited attempts to share their perspectives, health professions also employ specific techniques to solicit them. Physiotherapists are recommended to assess lay perspectives and include them in treatment. One way to do so is through invitations for lay diagnosis (this paper). However, little is known about how lay perspectives are constructed through these invitations and how physiotherapists follow up on them. In this study, physiotherapy intakes were analyzed using conversation analysis. We found that invitations for lay diagnosis are frequently embedded in previous health care visits or patients' knowledge gathering activities. Patients often express low epistemic status when they construct their lay perspectives and engage in lay diagnostic activity in response to these invitations. Additionally, physiotherapists' responses in the third position, such as follow-up questions, may influence the further development of patients' lay perspectives. These invitations provide patients an opportunity to share their views on their health issues, but also create an interactional challenge due to the reversal of usual epistemic dynamics. The study highlights the complexity of doing lay diagnosis, which can include diagnoses or explanations of varying specificity. The specificity and elaboration of these perspectives are influenced by the physiotherapists' subsequent responses. We provide recommendations for healthcare professionals to facilitate lay diagnosis, and our findings contribute to the discussion around patient empowerment, shared decision making, and patient centered care.

"你自己知道发生了什么吗?荷兰初级医疗物理治疗中的非专业诊断邀请函》。
非专业人士的观点对于非特异性疼痛患者的康复非常重要,因为它们会影响疼痛程度和患者的疼痛体验。尽管以往的互动研究主要集中在患者主动尝试分享他们的观点上,但健康专业人员也会采用特定的技术来征求他们的观点。建议物理治疗师评估非专业人士的观点,并将其纳入治疗中。其中一种方法是邀请非专业人员进行诊断(本文)。然而,对于如何通过这些邀请构建非专业人士的观点以及物理治疗师如何跟进这些观点,人们知之甚少。在本研究中,我们使用对话分析法对物理治疗接诊进行了分析。我们发现,非专业人士的诊断邀请常常包含在之前的医疗访问或患者的知识收集活动中。患者在构建自己的非专业视角和参与非专业诊断活动以回应这些邀请时,往往表现出较低的认识论地位。此外,物理治疗师在第三位的回应,如追问,可能会影响患者非专业视角的进一步发展。这些邀请为患者提供了一个分享自己对健康问题看法的机会,但也因颠覆了通常的认识论动态而带来了互动挑战。这项研究强调了进行非专业诊断的复杂性,其中可能包括不同具体程度的诊断或解释。这些观点的具体性和阐述受到物理治疗师后续反应的影响。我们为医护人员提供了促进非专业诊断的建议,我们的研究结果有助于围绕患者授权、共同决策和以患者为中心的护理展开讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信