Influence of Preoperative Disability on Outcomes Following Primary Surgical Treatment of Cervical Disc Herniation.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ishan Khosla, Fatima N Anwar, Andrea M Roca, Alexandra C Loya, Srinath S Medakkar, Aayush Kaul, Jacob C Wolf, Vincent P Federico, Arash J Sayari, Gregory D Lopez, Kern Singh
{"title":"Influence of Preoperative Disability on Outcomes Following Primary Surgical Treatment of Cervical Disc Herniation.","authors":"Ishan Khosla, Fatima N Anwar, Andrea M Roca, Alexandra C Loya, Srinath S Medakkar, Aayush Kaul, Jacob C Wolf, Vincent P Federico, Arash J Sayari, Gregory D Lopez, Kern Singh","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective review.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate how preoperative disability influences patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following primary surgical intervention for cervical herniated disc.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>The effect of baseline disability has been evaluated for various spinal surgeries, but not specifically for primary cervical herniated disc.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospectively maintained single surgeon database was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients who underwent primary cervical spine surgery for herniated nucleus pulposus. Demographics, perioperative data, and baseline/postoperative PROs were collected including Neck Disability Index (NDI), Visual Analog Scale-Arm/Neck (VAS-A/N), 12-Item Short Form Mental/Physical Component Scores (SF-12 MCS/PCS), Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), and 9-Item Patient-Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Baseline NDI <50/≥50 defined 2 cohorts. ΔPROs were determined at 6-week postoperatively/final follow-up (average 11.8±7.7 postoperative months). Overall rates of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement were determined for each PRO. Perioperative characteristics/demographics/baseline PROs were compared with χ2 tests (categorical variables)/the Student t test (continuous variables). Intercohort postoperative PROs/ΔPROs/MCID attainment rates were compared with multivariate linear regression (continuous variables)/multivariate logistic regression (categorical variables) accounting for differences in insurance type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 190 patients, there were 69 in the NDI ≥50 group. Patients with NDI ≥50 were more likely to have workers' compensation, or Medicare/Medicaid insurance (P<0.001) and report worse baseline PROs (P≤0.001, all). After controlling for insurance type, NDI ≥50 patients continued to report worse PROs at 6 weeks/final follow-up (P≤0.037, all), except PROMIS-PF at 6 weeks postoperatively. NDI ≥50 patients reported greater NDI improvements at 6 weeks (P=0.007) and final follow-up (P<0.001). NDI ≥50 patients experienced higher overall MCID achievement rates for PHQ-9/NDI (P≤0.015, both).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NDI ≥50 patients reported worse baseline mental/physical health and neck/arm pain and continued to report inferior postoperative outcomes including disability. Despite inferior absolute outcomes, NDI ≥50 patients reported greater improvements/achievement of clinically significant differences in disability through final follow-up. Further, these patients were more likely to experience clinically significant improvements in depressive burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001693","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective review.

Objective: To evaluate how preoperative disability influences patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following primary surgical intervention for cervical herniated disc.

Summary of background data: The effect of baseline disability has been evaluated for various spinal surgeries, but not specifically for primary cervical herniated disc.

Methods: A prospectively maintained single surgeon database was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients who underwent primary cervical spine surgery for herniated nucleus pulposus. Demographics, perioperative data, and baseline/postoperative PROs were collected including Neck Disability Index (NDI), Visual Analog Scale-Arm/Neck (VAS-A/N), 12-Item Short Form Mental/Physical Component Scores (SF-12 MCS/PCS), Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), and 9-Item Patient-Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Baseline NDI <50/≥50 defined 2 cohorts. ΔPROs were determined at 6-week postoperatively/final follow-up (average 11.8±7.7 postoperative months). Overall rates of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement were determined for each PRO. Perioperative characteristics/demographics/baseline PROs were compared with χ2 tests (categorical variables)/the Student t test (continuous variables). Intercohort postoperative PROs/ΔPROs/MCID attainment rates were compared with multivariate linear regression (continuous variables)/multivariate logistic regression (categorical variables) accounting for differences in insurance type.

Results: Of 190 patients, there were 69 in the NDI ≥50 group. Patients with NDI ≥50 were more likely to have workers' compensation, or Medicare/Medicaid insurance (P<0.001) and report worse baseline PROs (P≤0.001, all). After controlling for insurance type, NDI ≥50 patients continued to report worse PROs at 6 weeks/final follow-up (P≤0.037, all), except PROMIS-PF at 6 weeks postoperatively. NDI ≥50 patients reported greater NDI improvements at 6 weeks (P=0.007) and final follow-up (P<0.001). NDI ≥50 patients experienced higher overall MCID achievement rates for PHQ-9/NDI (P≤0.015, both).

Conclusions: NDI ≥50 patients reported worse baseline mental/physical health and neck/arm pain and continued to report inferior postoperative outcomes including disability. Despite inferior absolute outcomes, NDI ≥50 patients reported greater improvements/achievement of clinically significant differences in disability through final follow-up. Further, these patients were more likely to experience clinically significant improvements in depressive burden.

术前残疾对颈椎间盘突出症初级手术治疗效果的影响
研究设计回顾性研究:评估颈椎间盘突出症初级手术治疗后,术前残疾如何影响患者报告结果(PROs):对各种脊柱手术的基线残疾影响进行了评估,但没有专门针对原发性颈椎间盘突出症的评估:方法:回顾性审查了一个前瞻性维护的单个外科医生数据库,以确定因髓核突出而接受原发性颈椎手术的患者。收集了人口统计学、围手术期数据和基线/术后PROs,包括颈部残疾指数(NDI)、视觉模拟量表-手臂/颈部(VAS-A/N)、12项简表精神/体力成分评分(SF-12 MCS/PCS)、患者报告结果测量信息系统-体力功能(PROMIS-PF)和9项患者健康问卷(PHQ-9)。基线 NDI 结果:在 190 名患者中,NDI ≥50 组有 69 人。NDI≥50 的患者更有可能拥有工伤保险或医疗保险/医疗补助保险(PConclusions:NDI≥50患者的基线心理/生理健康状况和颈部/手臂疼痛较差,术后结果(包括残疾)仍然较差。尽管绝对结果较差,但 NDI≥50 的患者在最终随访中报告的残疾改善程度更高/达到了临床显著差异。此外,这些患者更有可能在抑郁负担方面获得有临床意义的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Spine Surgery
Clinical Spine Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
236
期刊介绍: Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure. Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信