Improving the non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) pathway using quality improvement methodology.

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Susan Goodfellow, Jonathan Goodfellow
{"title":"Improving the non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) pathway using quality improvement methodology.","authors":"Susan Goodfellow, Jonathan Goodfellow","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline quality standard for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) pathway states that adults who have an intermediate or higher risk of future adverse cardiovascular events should undergo coronary angiography within 72 hours of first admission to hospital.The aim was to improve compliance with the 72-hour NICE quality standard for the acute coronary syndrome pathway between one district general hospital (DGH) and its cardiac tertiary centre by reducing the time from admission to angiography by 50%.Participants were front-line staff in the DGH and staff in the cardiac catheter laboratory in the tertiary centre.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Continuous data were collected prospectively on all patients entering the NSTEACS pathway with time of arrival to hospital; referral to angiography; and start of angiogram to measure the NSTEACS pathway duration against the NICE quality standard. We used process mapping, ease-benefit matrix, Pareto analyses and the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) method of quality improvement.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Staff in both hospitals performed process mapping of their respective parts of the NSTEACS pathway. Their data informed decisions on process changes using the ease-benefit matrix. PDSA cycles were commenced, and changes were assessed using continuous measurement of pathway duration. In the tertiary centre, Pareto analysis was performed to help identify the major service constraints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between January 2021 and March 2023, there were four separate PDSA cycles, two each in the DGH and tertiary centre. Across the four PDSA cycles, the time to complete the pathway reduced from an average of 172 to 94.72 hours, an improvement of 45%, along with an overall reduction in variability of data. In the DGH, the process changes were sustained, but in the tertiary centre they were not, as PDSA 4 required staff recruitment to enable a 6-day rather than a 5-day service per week.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline quality standard for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) pathway states that adults who have an intermediate or higher risk of future adverse cardiovascular events should undergo coronary angiography within 72 hours of first admission to hospital.The aim was to improve compliance with the 72-hour NICE quality standard for the acute coronary syndrome pathway between one district general hospital (DGH) and its cardiac tertiary centre by reducing the time from admission to angiography by 50%.Participants were front-line staff in the DGH and staff in the cardiac catheter laboratory in the tertiary centre.

Methods: Continuous data were collected prospectively on all patients entering the NSTEACS pathway with time of arrival to hospital; referral to angiography; and start of angiogram to measure the NSTEACS pathway duration against the NICE quality standard. We used process mapping, ease-benefit matrix, Pareto analyses and the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) method of quality improvement.

Intervention: Staff in both hospitals performed process mapping of their respective parts of the NSTEACS pathway. Their data informed decisions on process changes using the ease-benefit matrix. PDSA cycles were commenced, and changes were assessed using continuous measurement of pathway duration. In the tertiary centre, Pareto analysis was performed to help identify the major service constraints.

Results: Between January 2021 and March 2023, there were four separate PDSA cycles, two each in the DGH and tertiary centre. Across the four PDSA cycles, the time to complete the pathway reduced from an average of 172 to 94.72 hours, an improvement of 45%, along with an overall reduction in variability of data. In the DGH, the process changes were sustained, but in the tertiary centre they were not, as PDSA 4 required staff recruitment to enable a 6-day rather than a 5-day service per week.

利用质量改进方法改进非 ST 段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征 (NSTEACS) 的治疗路径。
背景:美国国家健康与护理优化研究所(NICE)非ST段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTEACS)路径指南质量标准规定,未来发生不良心血管事件的风险为中度或高度的成年人应在首次入院后 72 小时内接受冠状动脉造影术。该研究旨在提高一家地区综合医院(DGH)及其心脏三级中心对急性冠状动脉综合征路径72小时NICE质量标准的遵守程度,将入院到血管造影的时间缩短50%:前瞻性地收集了所有进入 NSTEACS 途径的患者的连续数据,包括抵达医院的时间、转诊至血管造影术的时间以及开始血管造影术的时间,以便根据 NICE 质量标准衡量 NSTEACS 途径的持续时间。我们采用了流程映射、简易-效益矩阵、帕累托分析和美国医疗保健改进研究所(IHI)的 "计划-实施-研究-行动"(PDSA)质量改进方法:干预措施:两家医院的员工对各自的 NSTEACS 病程进行了流程规划。他们的数据为使用易效矩阵改变流程提供了决策依据。开始实施 PDSA 循环,并通过持续测量路径持续时间来评估流程变化。在三级中心,进行了帕累托分析,以帮助确定主要的服务限制因素:从 2021 年 1 月到 2023 年 3 月,共进行了四个独立的 PDSA 周期,东区医院和三级中心各两个。在这四个 PDSA 周期中,完成路径的时间从平均 172 小时减少到 94.72 小时,缩短了 45%,数据的可变性也全面降低。在 DGH,流程的改变得以持续,但在三级中心则不然,因为 PDSA 4 需要招聘员工,以实现每周 6 天而非 5 天的服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信