The effect of aortic morphology on perioperative rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm-a retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy Pub Date : 2024-10-31 Epub Date: 2024-10-17 DOI:10.21037/cdt-24-210
Zhang Cheng, Liying Ma, Xinghan Zhao, Ruihai Wang
{"title":"The effect of aortic morphology on perioperative rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm-a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Zhang Cheng, Liying Ma, Xinghan Zhao, Ruihai Wang","doi":"10.21037/cdt-24-210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The high mortality from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is well-documented. However, the perioperative rupture risk is often underestimated. Aortic morphology is a key unresolved factor influencing this risk. This study aims to assess the impact of aortic morphology on the risk of perioperative rupture of AAAs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted among patients undergoing perioperative endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for AAAs between September 2017 and October 2021. All measurements were obtained using dedicated hospital reconstruction software. The primary endpoints were mortality and AAAs rupture. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyze the association of risk factors with rupture. Piecewise linear regression was used to analyze the threshold effect of proximal neck angulation on rupture of AAAs. The clinical correlation between proximal aneurysm neck angulation and rupture was retrospectively studied after adjusting for potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 160 patients were included. The incidence of AAAs rupture in patients with severe proximal aneurysm neck angulation was significantly higher than in patients without proximal aneurysm neck angulation (15.9% <i>vs.</i> 7.8%, P=0.001). After adjusting for gender, max aneurysm diameter and symptom, severe proximal aneurysm neck angulation was independently associated with AAAs rupture [odds ratio (OR) =8.159, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.202-30.236; P=0.001]. After adjusting for gender, proximal aneurysm neck angulation and symptom, max aneurysm diameter was independently associated with AAAs rupture (OR =1.093, 95% CI: 1.046-1.143; P<0.001). The female seemed to have severe proximal neck angulation. When the angulation was greater than 41°, the risk of rupture increased linearly.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EVAR remains the preferred surgical approach for managing AAAs, guided by morphological and anatomical considerations. We have established a significant correlation between the extent of proximal neck angulation and the risk of perioperative rupture in aneurysms. Proximal neck angulation differs significantly between genders, with females exhibiting greater angulation than males. Clinicians should meticulously assess proximal neck angulation in patients undergoing EVAR and consider early intervention for those with severe angulation to mitigate the risk of rupture.</p>","PeriodicalId":9592,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy","volume":"14 5","pages":"890-898"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11538848/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/cdt-24-210","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The high mortality from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is well-documented. However, the perioperative rupture risk is often underestimated. Aortic morphology is a key unresolved factor influencing this risk. This study aims to assess the impact of aortic morphology on the risk of perioperative rupture of AAAs.

Methods: A multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted among patients undergoing perioperative endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for AAAs between September 2017 and October 2021. All measurements were obtained using dedicated hospital reconstruction software. The primary endpoints were mortality and AAAs rupture. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyze the association of risk factors with rupture. Piecewise linear regression was used to analyze the threshold effect of proximal neck angulation on rupture of AAAs. The clinical correlation between proximal aneurysm neck angulation and rupture was retrospectively studied after adjusting for potential confounders.

Results: A total of 160 patients were included. The incidence of AAAs rupture in patients with severe proximal aneurysm neck angulation was significantly higher than in patients without proximal aneurysm neck angulation (15.9% vs. 7.8%, P=0.001). After adjusting for gender, max aneurysm diameter and symptom, severe proximal aneurysm neck angulation was independently associated with AAAs rupture [odds ratio (OR) =8.159, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.202-30.236; P=0.001]. After adjusting for gender, proximal aneurysm neck angulation and symptom, max aneurysm diameter was independently associated with AAAs rupture (OR =1.093, 95% CI: 1.046-1.143; P<0.001). The female seemed to have severe proximal neck angulation. When the angulation was greater than 41°, the risk of rupture increased linearly.

Conclusions: EVAR remains the preferred surgical approach for managing AAAs, guided by morphological and anatomical considerations. We have established a significant correlation between the extent of proximal neck angulation and the risk of perioperative rupture in aneurysms. Proximal neck angulation differs significantly between genders, with females exhibiting greater angulation than males. Clinicians should meticulously assess proximal neck angulation in patients undergoing EVAR and consider early intervention for those with severe angulation to mitigate the risk of rupture.

主动脉形态对腹主动脉瘤围手术期破裂的影响--一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:腹主动脉瘤(AAA)破裂造成的高死亡率已得到充分证实。然而,围手术期的破裂风险往往被低估。主动脉形态是影响这一风险的一个关键性未决因素。本研究旨在评估主动脉形态对 AAA 围手术期破裂风险的影响:在2017年9月至2021年10月期间,对接受AAA围手术期血管内动脉瘤修补术(EVAR)的患者进行了一项多中心回顾性队列研究。所有测量数据均通过专用的医院重建软件获得。主要终点是死亡率和 AAA 破裂。单变量和多变量逻辑回归用于分析风险因素与破裂的关系。片断线性回归用于分析近端颈部角度对 AAAs 破裂的阈值效应。在调整了潜在的混杂因素后,对动脉瘤近端颈部角度与破裂之间的临床相关性进行了回顾性研究:结果:共纳入 160 例患者。严重近端动脉瘤颈成角患者的 AAA 破裂发生率明显高于无近端动脉瘤颈成角的患者(15.9% 对 7.8%,P=0.001)。在对性别、动脉瘤最大直径和症状进行调整后,严重的近端动脉瘤颈成角与 AAAs 破裂有独立相关性[几率比(OR)=8.159,95% 置信区间(CI):2.202-30.236;P=0.001]。调整性别、动脉瘤近端颈部角度和症状后,动脉瘤最大直径与 AAAs 破裂独立相关(OR =1.093,95% CI:1.046-1.143;P=0.001):在形态学和解剖学因素的指导下,EVAR 仍是治疗 AAA 的首选手术方法。我们已确定动脉瘤近端颈部成角程度与围手术期破裂风险之间存在显著相关性。近端颈部成角在性别上有显著差异,女性比男性的成角更大。临床医生应仔细评估接受 EVAR 手术患者的近端颈部成角情况,并考虑对成角严重的患者进行早期干预,以降低破裂风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy
Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.20%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The journal ''Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy'' (Print ISSN: 2223-3652; Online ISSN: 2223-3660) accepts basic and clinical science submissions related to Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery. The mission of the journal is the rapid exchange of scientific information between clinicians and scientists worldwide. To reach this goal, the journal will focus on novel media, using a web-based, digital format in addition to traditional print-version. This includes on-line submission, review, publication, and distribution. The digital format will also allow submission of extensive supporting visual material, both images and video. The website www.thecdt.org will serve as the central hub and also allow posting of comments and on-line discussion. The web-site of the journal will be linked to a number of international web-sites (e.g. www.dxy.cn), which will significantly expand the distribution of its contents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信