Concordance Between Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency Review and Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Decision Among New Drug Applications in Japan.

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Makoto Miyazawa, Mototsugu Tanaka, Yusuke Tanaka, Ryohei Terashima, Mio Ezura, Haruna Miyazawa, Mutsuhiro Ikuma, Yoshihiko Tomita
{"title":"Concordance Between Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency Review and Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Decision Among New Drug Applications in Japan.","authors":"Makoto Miyazawa, Mototsugu Tanaka, Yusuke Tanaka, Ryohei Terashima, Mio Ezura, Haruna Miyazawa, Mutsuhiro Ikuma, Yoshihiko Tomita","doi":"10.1002/cpt.3485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>New drug applications (NDAs) in Japan are reviewed by the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA). Those that pass the review are subsequently subject to deliberation by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Pharmaceutical Affairs and Food Sanitation Councils (MHLW-PAFSC), and the MHLW legislatively grants approval based on its positive opinions. However, little is known regarding the relationship between the PMDA review and the MHLW decision. We retrospectively assessed the MHLW decision of NDAs that passed the PMDA review at the initial MHLW-PAFSC deliberation from 2002 to 2022. The reasoning behind a non-supportive opinion from the MHLW-PAFSC and the sponsor's actions to overcome unresolved issues were also documented. A total of 2,117 of 2,153 (98.3%) NDAs that passed the PMDA review were approved at the initial MHLW-PAFSC deliberation with a positive opinion. The remaining 36 applications were not approved at the initial deliberation and subjected to continued deliberation because of a non-supportive opinion from the councils, although 29 were finally approved through revision of the application document (24 applications), re-analysis of the data (1 application), or additional clinical trials (4 applications). Seven applications have not been approved, of which one was refused, four were withdrawn, and two were unknown. The MHLW approves NDAs that passed the PMDA review at the initial deliberation at a high rate, suggesting that NDAs only suitable for approval passed the review and reached the MHLW-PAFSC deliberation. Only a few NDAs were not approved at the initial deliberation; however, most of them were finally approved.</p>","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.3485","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

New drug applications (NDAs) in Japan are reviewed by the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA). Those that pass the review are subsequently subject to deliberation by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Pharmaceutical Affairs and Food Sanitation Councils (MHLW-PAFSC), and the MHLW legislatively grants approval based on its positive opinions. However, little is known regarding the relationship between the PMDA review and the MHLW decision. We retrospectively assessed the MHLW decision of NDAs that passed the PMDA review at the initial MHLW-PAFSC deliberation from 2002 to 2022. The reasoning behind a non-supportive opinion from the MHLW-PAFSC and the sponsor's actions to overcome unresolved issues were also documented. A total of 2,117 of 2,153 (98.3%) NDAs that passed the PMDA review were approved at the initial MHLW-PAFSC deliberation with a positive opinion. The remaining 36 applications were not approved at the initial deliberation and subjected to continued deliberation because of a non-supportive opinion from the councils, although 29 were finally approved through revision of the application document (24 applications), re-analysis of the data (1 application), or additional clinical trials (4 applications). Seven applications have not been approved, of which one was refused, four were withdrawn, and two were unknown. The MHLW approves NDAs that passed the PMDA review at the initial deliberation at a high rate, suggesting that NDAs only suitable for approval passed the review and reached the MHLW-PAFSC deliberation. Only a few NDAs were not approved at the initial deliberation; however, most of them were finally approved.

日本新药申请中药品和医疗器械机构审查与厚生劳动省决定的一致性。
日本的新药申请(NDA)由药品和医疗器械管理局(PMDA)审查。通过审查的申请随后由厚生劳动省制药事务和食品卫生委员会(MHLW-PAFSC)进行审议,厚生劳动省根据其积极的意见通过立法予以批准。然而,人们对PMDA审查与厚生省决定之间的关系知之甚少。我们回顾性地评估了2002年至2022年期间厚生省-食品添加剂和配料委员会初次审议时通过PMDA审查的NDA的厚生省决定。我们还记录了厚生省-爱国阵线委员会不支持意见的理由,以及申办者为解决未决问题所采取的行动。在 2,153 份通过 PMDA 审查的 NDA 中,共有 2,117 份(98.3%)在厚生省-PAFSC 的初次审议中以肯定意见获得批准。其余 36 份申请在初次审议时未获得批准,由于委员会未提出支持性意见而需继续审议,但 29 份申请通过修改申请文件(24 份申请)、重新分析数据(1 份申请)或补充临床试验(4 份申请)最终获得批准。有 7 项申请未获批准,其中 1 项被拒绝,4 项被撤回,2 项不详。厚生省对在初审中通过 PMDA 审查的 NDA 批准率很高,这表明只有适合批准的 NDA 才能通过审查并进入厚生省-PAFSC 审议。只有少数新药开发协议在初审时未获得批准,但大多数最终获得批准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.50%
发文量
290
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (CPT) is the authoritative cross-disciplinary journal in experimental and clinical medicine devoted to publishing advances in the nature, action, efficacy, and evaluation of therapeutics. CPT welcomes original Articles in the emerging areas of translational, predictive and personalized medicine; new therapeutic modalities including gene and cell therapies; pharmacogenomics, proteomics and metabolomics; bioinformation and applied systems biology complementing areas of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, human investigation and clinical trials, pharmacovigilence, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacometrics, and population pharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信