{"title":"DyLaClass: Dynamic Labeling Based Classification for Optimal Sparse Matrix Format Selection in Accelerating SpMV","authors":"Zheng Shi;Yi Zou;Xianfeng Song;Shupeng Li;Fangming Liu;Quan Xue","doi":"10.1109/TPDS.2024.3488053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sparse matrix-vector multiplication (SpMV) is crucial in many scientific and engineering applications, particularly concerning the effectiveness of different sparse matrix storage formats for various architectures, no single format excels across all hardware. Previous research has focused on trying different algorithms to build predictors for the best format, yet it overlooked how to address the issue of the best format changing in the same hardware environment and how to reduce prediction overhead rather than merely considering the overhead in building predictors. This paper proposes a novel classification algorithm for optimizing sparse matrix storage formats, DyLaClass, based on dynamic labeling and flexible feature selection. Particularly, we introduce mixed labels and features with strong correlations, allowing us to achieve ultra-high prediction accuracy with minimal feature inputs, significantly reducing feature extraction overhead. For the first time, we propose the concept of the most suitable storage format rather than the best storage format, which can stably predict changes in the best format for the same matrix across multiple SpMV executions. We further demonstrate the proposed method on the University of Florida’s public sparse matrix collection dataset. Experimental results show that compared to existing work, our method achieves up to 91% classification accuracy. Using two different hardware platforms for verification, the proposed method outperforms existing methods by 1.26 to 1.43 times. Most importantly, the stability of the proposed prediction model is 25.5% higher than previous methods, greatly increasing the feasibility of the model in practical field applications.","PeriodicalId":13257,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems","volume":"35 12","pages":"2624-2639"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10738209/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Sparse matrix-vector multiplication (SpMV) is crucial in many scientific and engineering applications, particularly concerning the effectiveness of different sparse matrix storage formats for various architectures, no single format excels across all hardware. Previous research has focused on trying different algorithms to build predictors for the best format, yet it overlooked how to address the issue of the best format changing in the same hardware environment and how to reduce prediction overhead rather than merely considering the overhead in building predictors. This paper proposes a novel classification algorithm for optimizing sparse matrix storage formats, DyLaClass, based on dynamic labeling and flexible feature selection. Particularly, we introduce mixed labels and features with strong correlations, allowing us to achieve ultra-high prediction accuracy with minimal feature inputs, significantly reducing feature extraction overhead. For the first time, we propose the concept of the most suitable storage format rather than the best storage format, which can stably predict changes in the best format for the same matrix across multiple SpMV executions. We further demonstrate the proposed method on the University of Florida’s public sparse matrix collection dataset. Experimental results show that compared to existing work, our method achieves up to 91% classification accuracy. Using two different hardware platforms for verification, the proposed method outperforms existing methods by 1.26 to 1.43 times. Most importantly, the stability of the proposed prediction model is 25.5% higher than previous methods, greatly increasing the feasibility of the model in practical field applications.
期刊介绍:
IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems (TPDS) is published monthly. It publishes a range of papers, comments on previously published papers, and survey articles that deal with the parallel and distributed systems research areas of current importance to our readers. Particular areas of interest include, but are not limited to:
a) Parallel and distributed algorithms, focusing on topics such as: models of computation; numerical, combinatorial, and data-intensive parallel algorithms, scalability of algorithms and data structures for parallel and distributed systems, communication and synchronization protocols, network algorithms, scheduling, and load balancing.
b) Applications of parallel and distributed computing, including computational and data-enabled science and engineering, big data applications, parallel crowd sourcing, large-scale social network analysis, management of big data, cloud and grid computing, scientific and biomedical applications, mobile computing, and cyber-physical systems.
c) Parallel and distributed architectures, including architectures for instruction-level and thread-level parallelism; design, analysis, implementation, fault resilience and performance measurements of multiple-processor systems; multicore processors, heterogeneous many-core systems; petascale and exascale systems designs; novel big data architectures; special purpose architectures, including graphics processors, signal processors, network processors, media accelerators, and other special purpose processors and accelerators; impact of technology on architecture; network and interconnect architectures; parallel I/O and storage systems; architecture of the memory hierarchy; power-efficient and green computing architectures; dependable architectures; and performance modeling and evaluation.
d) Parallel and distributed software, including parallel and multicore programming languages and compilers, runtime systems, operating systems, Internet computing and web services, resource management including green computing, middleware for grids, clouds, and data centers, libraries, performance modeling and evaluation, parallel programming paradigms, and programming environments and tools.