Transitions to crop residue burning have multiple antecedents in Eastern India

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
E. Urban Cordeiro, A. Samaddar, S. Munshi, A. Ajay, D. G. Rossiter, R. K. Sohane, R. Malik, P. Craufurd, P. Pingali, A.J. McDonald
{"title":"Transitions to crop residue burning have multiple antecedents in Eastern India","authors":"E. Urban Cordeiro,&nbsp;A. Samaddar,&nbsp;S. Munshi,&nbsp;A. Ajay,&nbsp;D. G. Rossiter,&nbsp;R. K. Sohane,&nbsp;R. Malik,&nbsp;P. Craufurd,&nbsp;P. Pingali,&nbsp;A.J. McDonald","doi":"10.1007/s13593-024-00983-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Far removed from the agricultural fire “hotspots” of Northwestern India, rice residue burning is on the rise in Eastern India with implications for regional air quality and agricultural sustainability. The underlying drivers contributing to the increase in burning have been linked to the adoption of mechanized (combine) harvesting but, in general, are inadequately understood. We hypothesize that the adoption of burning as a management practice results from a set of socio-technical interactions rather than emerging from a single factor. Using a mixed methods approach, a household survey (<i>n</i> = 475) provided quantitative insights into landscape and farm-scale drivers of burning and was complemented by an in-depth qualitative survey (<i>n</i> = 36) to characterize decision processes and to verify causal inferences derived from the broader survey. For communities where the combine harvester is present, our results show that rice residue burning is not inevitable. The decision to burn appears to emerge from a cascading sequence of events, starting with the following: (1) decreasing household labor, <i>leading to</i> (2) decreasing household livestock holdings, <i>resulting in</i> (3) reduced demands for residue fodder, <i>incentivizing</i> (4) adoption of labor-efficient combine harvesting and subsequent burning of loose residues that are both difficult to collect and of lower feeding value than manually harvested straw. Local demand for crop residues for livestock feeding plays a central role mediating transitions to burning. Consequently, policy response options that only consider the role of the combine harvester are likely to be ineffective. Innovative strategies such as the creation of decentralized commercial models for dairy value chains may bolster local residue demand by addressing household-scale labor bottlenecks to maintaining livestock. Secondary issues, such as timely rice planting, merit consideration as part of holistic responses to “bend” agricultural burning trajectories in Eastern India towards more sustainable practices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7721,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","volume":"44 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13593-024-00983-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-024-00983-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Far removed from the agricultural fire “hotspots” of Northwestern India, rice residue burning is on the rise in Eastern India with implications for regional air quality and agricultural sustainability. The underlying drivers contributing to the increase in burning have been linked to the adoption of mechanized (combine) harvesting but, in general, are inadequately understood. We hypothesize that the adoption of burning as a management practice results from a set of socio-technical interactions rather than emerging from a single factor. Using a mixed methods approach, a household survey (n = 475) provided quantitative insights into landscape and farm-scale drivers of burning and was complemented by an in-depth qualitative survey (n = 36) to characterize decision processes and to verify causal inferences derived from the broader survey. For communities where the combine harvester is present, our results show that rice residue burning is not inevitable. The decision to burn appears to emerge from a cascading sequence of events, starting with the following: (1) decreasing household labor, leading to (2) decreasing household livestock holdings, resulting in (3) reduced demands for residue fodder, incentivizing (4) adoption of labor-efficient combine harvesting and subsequent burning of loose residues that are both difficult to collect and of lower feeding value than manually harvested straw. Local demand for crop residues for livestock feeding plays a central role mediating transitions to burning. Consequently, policy response options that only consider the role of the combine harvester are likely to be ineffective. Innovative strategies such as the creation of decentralized commercial models for dairy value chains may bolster local residue demand by addressing household-scale labor bottlenecks to maintaining livestock. Secondary issues, such as timely rice planting, merit consideration as part of holistic responses to “bend” agricultural burning trajectories in Eastern India towards more sustainable practices.

Abstract Image

印度东部向焚烧作物残留物过渡有多种前因
印度东部远离印度西北部的农业火灾 "热点",但稻米秸秆焚烧却在不断增加,对地区空气质量和农业可持续性产生了影响。导致焚烧现象增加的根本原因与采用机械化(联合收割机)收割有关,但总体而言,人们对这一原因的了解还不够充分。我们假设,焚烧作为一种管理方法的采用是一系列社会-技术相互作用的结果,而不是单一因素造成的。我们采用了一种混合方法,通过家庭调查(n = 475)对焚烧的景观和农场规模驱动因素进行了定量分析,并辅之以深入的定性调查(n = 36),以确定决策过程的特征并验证从更广泛的调查中得出的因果推论。对于使用联合收割机的社区,我们的研究结果表明,焚烧水稻秸秆并非不可避免。焚烧的决定似乎是由一连串事件引起的,首先是以下事件:(1)家庭劳动力减少,导致(2)家庭牲畜存栏量减少,从而(3)对秸秆饲料的需求减少,促使(4)采用省力的联合收割机收割,随后焚烧松散的秸秆,因为这些秸秆既难以收集,饲养价值也低于人工收割的秸秆。当地对用于牲畜饲养的作物秸秆的需求在向焚烧过渡的过程中起着核心作用。因此,只考虑联合收割机作用的政策应对方案很可能是无效的。创新战略,如创建分散的乳制品价值链商业模式,可通过解决家庭规模的劳动力瓶颈来维持牲畜饲养,从而促进当地的残留物需求。适时种植水稻等次要问题值得考虑,这是印度东部农业燃烧轨迹向更可持续做法 "弯曲 "的整体应对措施的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agronomy for Sustainable Development
Agronomy for Sustainable Development 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.20%
发文量
108
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Agronomy for Sustainable Development (ASD) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal of international scope, dedicated to publishing original research articles, review articles, and meta-analyses aimed at improving sustainability in agricultural and food systems. The journal serves as a bridge between agronomy, cropping, and farming system research and various other disciplines including ecology, genetics, economics, and social sciences. ASD encourages studies in agroecology, participatory research, and interdisciplinary approaches, with a focus on systems thinking applied at different scales from field to global levels. Research articles published in ASD should present significant scientific advancements compared to existing knowledge, within an international context. Review articles should critically evaluate emerging topics, and opinion papers may also be submitted as reviews. Meta-analysis articles should provide clear contributions to resolving widely debated scientific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信