The impact of in-house education on staff confidence in delivering palliative and end-of-life care: a service evaluation.

Tracey Cuthbert, Siobhan Taylor
{"title":"The impact of in-house education on staff confidence in delivering palliative and end-of-life care: a service evaluation.","authors":"Tracey Cuthbert, Siobhan Taylor","doi":"10.12968/bjon.2023.0297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Palliative and end-of-life care (EoLC) education is available to all community and hospital healthcare staff in one NHS trust in the north-east of England. It is also available to care home and domiciliary care staff within the geographical area of the trust.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This service evaluation assessed the effect of current in-house education on staff confidence levels in delivering palliative and EoLC. It also examined staff perceptions of how attendance at these courses impacted on the palliative and EoLC patients receive across the locality.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A mixed-methods approach was undertaken. Anonymous data were collected via surveys (<i>n</i>=238) sent out in March 2023 covering educational courses that were delivered from 1 January to 31 December 2022 with a 13% response rate. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data were explored using Braun and Clarke's (2012) six-stage approach to thematic analysis. A second staff member was asked to review the data to increase the trustworthiness of the study.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Staff confidence levels in delivering palliative and EoLC increased by 19% (somewhat confident) and 23% (extremely confident) following attendance at trust education. Staff perceived that those patients received better palliative and EoLC as a result their attendance at these courses. The qualitative data identified five main themes: symptom control, psychological support, holistic care, patient advocacy, and advance care planning. Limitations of the study included the low survey response rate and lack of exploration of patient/carer perceptions directly.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Palliative and EoLC education can increase staff confidence levels in care delivery and, as perceived by staff, results in better care for patients receiving palliative and EoLC. These findings provide evidence for the trust to consider making palliative and EoLC training mandatory, which could also be considered more widely regionally and nationally.</p>","PeriodicalId":520014,"journal":{"name":"British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)","volume":"33 20","pages":"976-982"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2023.0297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Palliative and end-of-life care (EoLC) education is available to all community and hospital healthcare staff in one NHS trust in the north-east of England. It is also available to care home and domiciliary care staff within the geographical area of the trust.

Aims: This service evaluation assessed the effect of current in-house education on staff confidence levels in delivering palliative and EoLC. It also examined staff perceptions of how attendance at these courses impacted on the palliative and EoLC patients receive across the locality.

Method: A mixed-methods approach was undertaken. Anonymous data were collected via surveys (n=238) sent out in March 2023 covering educational courses that were delivered from 1 January to 31 December 2022 with a 13% response rate. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data were explored using Braun and Clarke's (2012) six-stage approach to thematic analysis. A second staff member was asked to review the data to increase the trustworthiness of the study.

Findings: Staff confidence levels in delivering palliative and EoLC increased by 19% (somewhat confident) and 23% (extremely confident) following attendance at trust education. Staff perceived that those patients received better palliative and EoLC as a result their attendance at these courses. The qualitative data identified five main themes: symptom control, psychological support, holistic care, patient advocacy, and advance care planning. Limitations of the study included the low survey response rate and lack of exploration of patient/carer perceptions directly.

Conclusion: Palliative and EoLC education can increase staff confidence levels in care delivery and, as perceived by staff, results in better care for patients receiving palliative and EoLC. These findings provide evidence for the trust to consider making palliative and EoLC training mandatory, which could also be considered more widely regionally and nationally.

内部教育对员工提供姑息关怀和临终关怀信心的影响:一项服务评估。
背景:姑息关怀和临终关怀(EoLC)教育适用于英格兰东北部一家国家医疗服务系统信托机构的所有社区和医院医护人员。目的:这项服务评价评估了当前内部教育对员工开展姑息治疗和临终关怀信心水平的影响。该服务评估还考察了员工对参加这些课程对整个地区病人接受姑息治疗和镇痛护理的影响的看法:采用混合方法。通过 2023 年 3 月发出的调查问卷(n=238)收集匿名数据,调查范围包括 2022 年 1 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日期间开设的教育课程,回复率为 13%。定量数据采用描述性统计进行分析。定性数据采用 Braun 和 Clarke(2012 年)的六阶段专题分析方法进行探讨。为提高研究的可信度,还请第二名工作人员对数据进行审核:参加信托基金教育后,员工对提供姑息治疗和镇痛治疗的信心水平分别提高了19%(有一定信心)和23%(非常有信心)。员工认为,由于参加了这些课程,病人得到了更好的姑息治疗和姑息护理。定性数据确定了五大主题:症状控制、心理支持、整体护理、患者权益倡导和预先护理规划。研究的局限性包括调查回复率较低,以及缺乏对患者/照护者看法的直接探讨:姑息治疗和临终关怀教育可以提高员工对护理服务的信心水平,而且在员工看来,可以为接受姑息治疗和临终关怀的病人提供更好的护理服务。这些研究结果为该医疗机构考虑强制开展姑息治疗和临终关怀培训提供了证据,该培训也可在地区和全国范围内更广泛地开展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信