Responses of several measures to different intensity levels of upper limb exergames in children with neurological diagnoses: a pilot study.

IF 1.3 Q3 REHABILITATION
Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences Pub Date : 2024-10-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fresc.2024.1405304
Gaizka Goikoetxea-Sotelo, Hubertus J A van Hedel
{"title":"Responses of several measures to different intensity levels of upper limb exergames in children with neurological diagnoses: a pilot study.","authors":"Gaizka Goikoetxea-Sotelo, Hubertus J A van Hedel","doi":"10.3389/fresc.2024.1405304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Therapy intensity is among the most critical factors influencing neurorehabilitative outcomes. Because of its simplicity, time spent in therapy is the most commonly used measure of therapy intensity. However, time spent in therapy is only a vague estimate of how hard a patient works during therapy. Several measures have been proposed to better capture the amount of work a patient puts forth during therapy. Still, it has never been analyzed how these measures respond to changes in therapist-selected exercise intensity in children with neurological conditions.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the response and the reliability of heart rate variability (HRV), skin conductance (SC), activity counts per minute (AC/min), movement repetitions per minute (MOV/min), and perceived exertion to different therapist-tailored intensity levels of upper limb technology-assisted therapy in children with neurological conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this pilot cross-sectional study, participants engaged in three personalized, randomized exergame intensity levels (\"very easy\", \"challenging\", \"very difficult\") for eight minutes each. We assessed all measures at each intensity level. The experiment was conducted twice on two consecutive days. We quantified reliability using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 12 children and adolescents aged 11.92 (±3.03) years. HRV, MOV/min, and perceived exertion could differentiate among the three intensity levels. HRV, MOV/min, perceived exertion, and AC/min showed moderate to excellent (0.62 ≤ ICC ≤ 0.98) test-retest reliability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HRV, MOV/min, and perceived exertion show potential for becoming valid and reliable intensity measures for an upper limb robotic rehabilitative setting. However, studies with larger sample sizes and more standardized approaches are needed to understand these measures' responses better.</p>","PeriodicalId":73102,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11538011/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2024.1405304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Therapy intensity is among the most critical factors influencing neurorehabilitative outcomes. Because of its simplicity, time spent in therapy is the most commonly used measure of therapy intensity. However, time spent in therapy is only a vague estimate of how hard a patient works during therapy. Several measures have been proposed to better capture the amount of work a patient puts forth during therapy. Still, it has never been analyzed how these measures respond to changes in therapist-selected exercise intensity in children with neurological conditions.

Objectives: To investigate the response and the reliability of heart rate variability (HRV), skin conductance (SC), activity counts per minute (AC/min), movement repetitions per minute (MOV/min), and perceived exertion to different therapist-tailored intensity levels of upper limb technology-assisted therapy in children with neurological conditions.

Methods: In this pilot cross-sectional study, participants engaged in three personalized, randomized exergame intensity levels ("very easy", "challenging", "very difficult") for eight minutes each. We assessed all measures at each intensity level. The experiment was conducted twice on two consecutive days. We quantified reliability using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC).

Results: We included 12 children and adolescents aged 11.92 (±3.03) years. HRV, MOV/min, and perceived exertion could differentiate among the three intensity levels. HRV, MOV/min, perceived exertion, and AC/min showed moderate to excellent (0.62 ≤ ICC ≤ 0.98) test-retest reliability.

Conclusion: HRV, MOV/min, and perceived exertion show potential for becoming valid and reliable intensity measures for an upper limb robotic rehabilitative setting. However, studies with larger sample sizes and more standardized approaches are needed to understand these measures' responses better.

一项试点研究:患有神经系统疾病的儿童对不同强度的上肢电子游戏的反应。
背景:治疗强度是影响神经康复效果的最关键因素之一。由于其简单性,花费在治疗上的时间是最常用的治疗强度衡量标准。然而,花费在治疗上的时间只是对患者在治疗期间工作强度的一个模糊估计。为了更好地反映患者在治疗期间所付出的努力,已经提出了几种测量方法。但是,这些测量方法对神经系统疾病患儿治疗师选择的运动强度的变化有何反应,还从未进行过分析:目的:研究心率变异性(HRV)、皮肤电导率(SC)、每分钟活动次数(AC/min)、每分钟运动重复次数(MOV/min)和感知用力对治疗师为神经系统疾病患儿量身定制的不同强度的上肢技术辅助治疗的响应和可靠性:在这项试验性横断面研究中,参与者参与了三种个性化、随机化的外显子游戏强度级别("非常容易"、"具有挑战性"、"非常困难"),每种级别持续 8 分钟。我们评估了每个强度等级的所有测量指标。实验连续两天进行两次。我们使用类内相关系数(ICC)对可靠性进行了量化:我们纳入了 12 名儿童和青少年,他们的年龄为 11.92 (±3.03) 岁。心率变异、运动量/分钟和体力消耗感知可区分三种强度水平。心率变异、移动/分钟、感知用力和交流/分钟的测试-再测可靠性为中等至优秀(0.62 ≤ ICC ≤ 0.98):结论:心率变异、移动/分钟和感知用力显示出成为上肢机器人康复环境中有效、可靠的强度测量指标的潜力。然而,要想更好地了解这些指标的反应,还需要进行样本量更大、方法更标准化的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信