A vessel bifurcation liver CT landmark pair dataset for evaluating deformable image registration algorithms

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Medical physics Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1002/mp.17507
Zhendong Zhang, Edward Robert Criscuolo, Yao Hao, Trevor McKeown, Deshan Yang
{"title":"A vessel bifurcation liver CT landmark pair dataset for evaluating deformable image registration algorithms","authors":"Zhendong Zhang,&nbsp;Edward Robert Criscuolo,&nbsp;Yao Hao,&nbsp;Trevor McKeown,&nbsp;Deshan Yang","doi":"10.1002/mp.17507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Evaluating deformable image registration (DIR) algorithms is vital for enhancing algorithm performance and gaining clinical acceptance. However, there is a notable lack of dependable DIR benchmark datasets for assessing DIR performance except for lung images. To address this gap, we aim to introduce our comprehensive liver computed tomography (CT) DIR landmark dataset library. This dataset is designed for efficient and quantitative evaluation of various DIR methods for liver CTs, paving the way for more accurate and reliable image registration techniques.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Acquisition and validation methods</h3>\n \n <p>Forty CT liver image pairs were acquired from several publicly available image archives and authors’ institutions under institutional review board (IRB) approval. The images were processed with a semi-automatic procedure to generate landmark pairs: (1) for each case, liver vessels were automatically segmented on one image; (2) landmarks were automatically detected at vessel bifurcations; (3) corresponding landmarks in the second image were placed using two deformable image registration methods to avoid algorithm-specific biases; (4) a comprehensive validation process based on quantitative evaluation and manual assessment was applied to reject outliers and ensure the landmarks’ positional accuracy. This workflow resulted in an average of ∼56 landmark pairs per image pair, comprising a total of 2220 landmarks for 40 cases. The general landmarking accuracy of this procedure was evaluated using digital phantoms and manual landmark placement. The landmark pair target registration errors (TRE) on digital phantoms were 0.37 ± 0.26 and 0.55 ± 0.34 mm respectively for the two selected DIR algorithms used in our workflow, with 97% of landmark pairs having TREs below 1.5 mm. The distances from the calculated landmarks to the averaged manual placement were 1.27 ± 0.79 mm.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data format and usage notes</h3>\n \n <p>All data, including image files and landmark information, are publicly available at Zenodo (https://zenodo.org/records/13738577). Instructions for using our data can be found on our GitHub page at https://github.com/deshanyang/Liver-DIR-QA.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Potential applications</h3>\n \n <p>The landmark dataset generated in this work is the first collection of large-scale liver CT DIR landmarks prepared on real patient images. This dataset can provide researchers with a dense set of ground truth benchmarks for the quantitative evaluation of DIR algorithms within the liver.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18384,"journal":{"name":"Medical physics","volume":"52 1","pages":"703-715"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mp.17507","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Evaluating deformable image registration (DIR) algorithms is vital for enhancing algorithm performance and gaining clinical acceptance. However, there is a notable lack of dependable DIR benchmark datasets for assessing DIR performance except for lung images. To address this gap, we aim to introduce our comprehensive liver computed tomography (CT) DIR landmark dataset library. This dataset is designed for efficient and quantitative evaluation of various DIR methods for liver CTs, paving the way for more accurate and reliable image registration techniques.

Acquisition and validation methods

Forty CT liver image pairs were acquired from several publicly available image archives and authors’ institutions under institutional review board (IRB) approval. The images were processed with a semi-automatic procedure to generate landmark pairs: (1) for each case, liver vessels were automatically segmented on one image; (2) landmarks were automatically detected at vessel bifurcations; (3) corresponding landmarks in the second image were placed using two deformable image registration methods to avoid algorithm-specific biases; (4) a comprehensive validation process based on quantitative evaluation and manual assessment was applied to reject outliers and ensure the landmarks’ positional accuracy. This workflow resulted in an average of ∼56 landmark pairs per image pair, comprising a total of 2220 landmarks for 40 cases. The general landmarking accuracy of this procedure was evaluated using digital phantoms and manual landmark placement. The landmark pair target registration errors (TRE) on digital phantoms were 0.37 ± 0.26 and 0.55 ± 0.34 mm respectively for the two selected DIR algorithms used in our workflow, with 97% of landmark pairs having TREs below 1.5 mm. The distances from the calculated landmarks to the averaged manual placement were 1.27 ± 0.79 mm.

Data format and usage notes

All data, including image files and landmark information, are publicly available at Zenodo (https://zenodo.org/records/13738577). Instructions for using our data can be found on our GitHub page at https://github.com/deshanyang/Liver-DIR-QA.

Potential applications

The landmark dataset generated in this work is the first collection of large-scale liver CT DIR landmarks prepared on real patient images. This dataset can provide researchers with a dense set of ground truth benchmarks for the quantitative evaluation of DIR algorithms within the liver.

用于评估可变形图像配准算法的血管分叉肝脏 CT 地标对数据集。
目的:评估可变形图像配准(DIR)算法对于提高算法性能和获得临床认可至关重要。然而,除肺部图像外,目前明显缺乏用于评估 DIR 性能的可靠 DIR 基准数据集。为了填补这一空白,我们旨在推出全面的肝脏计算机断层扫描(CT)DIR 地标数据集库。该数据集旨在对肝脏 CT 的各种 DIR 方法进行高效、定量的评估,为更准确、更可靠的图像配准技术铺平道路:40对肝脏CT图像是在机构审查委员会(IRB)的批准下,从几个公开的图像档案馆和作者所在机构获取的。这些图像采用半自动程序进行处理,以生成地标对:(1) 对每个病例,在一张图像上自动分割肝脏血管;(2) 在血管分叉处自动检测地标;(3) 使用两种可变形图像配准方法在第二张图像上放置相应的地标,以避免算法的特定偏差;(4) 采用基于定量评估和人工评估的综合验证流程,以剔除异常值并确保地标位置的准确性。这一工作流程的结果是,每对图像平均有 56 个地标对,40 个病例共有 2220 个地标。使用数字模型和手动放置地标,对该流程的一般地标定位精度进行了评估。对于我们工作流程中使用的两种选定 DIR 算法,数字模型上的地标对目标配准误差(TRE)分别为 0.37 ± 0.26 毫米和 0.55 ± 0.34 毫米,97% 的地标对目标配准误差低于 1.5 毫米。计算出的地标到平均手动放置的距离为 1.27 ± 0.79 毫米:所有数据,包括图像文件和地标信息,均可在 Zenodo (https://zenodo.org/records/13738577) 上公开获取。数据使用说明可在我们的 GitHub 页面上找到:https://github.com/deshanyang/Liver-DIR-QA.Potential applications:这项工作中生成的地标数据集是首个在真实患者图像上制备的大规模肝脏 CT DIR 地标集合。该数据集可为研究人员提供一组密集的基本真实基准,用于定量评估肝脏内的 DIR 算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical physics
Medical physics 医学-核医学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
660
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Medical Physics publishes original, high impact physics, imaging science, and engineering research that advances patient diagnosis and therapy through contributions in 1) Basic science developments with high potential for clinical translation 2) Clinical applications of cutting edge engineering and physics innovations 3) Broadly applicable and innovative clinical physics developments Medical Physics is a journal of global scope and reach. By publishing in Medical Physics your research will reach an international, multidisciplinary audience including practicing medical physicists as well as physics- and engineering based translational scientists. We work closely with authors of promising articles to improve their quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信