Synthetic Medial Meniscus Implant Demonstrates High Reoperation Rates: Patients Who Retain Implant or Require Implant Exchange SHow Improvement For Post Meniscectomy Knee Pain Is Associated With Clinical Improvement But High Reoperation Rates At 2-Years Post-Operatively.
Thomas Carter, Deryk Jones, Scott Hacker, Wayne Gersoff
{"title":"Synthetic Medial Meniscus Implant Demonstrates High Reoperation Rates: Patients Who Retain Implant or Require Implant Exchange SHow Improvement For Post Meniscectomy Knee Pain Is Associated With Clinical Improvement But High Reoperation Rates At 2-Years Post-Operatively.","authors":"Thomas Carter, Deryk Jones, Scott Hacker, Wayne Gersoff","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.10.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes in the use of a synthetic medial meniscus implant in patients symptomatic after medial meniscectomy and not responsive to other treatment methods. and not responded to non-operative treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-arm, multicenter, prospective study enrolled subjects between ages 30-75 with post-meniscectomy pain. Changes from baseline to 24-months were measured in the pain subscale of the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) and in KOOS overall (average of all five subscales) in patients that had received a medial meniscus implant. Success was a 20-point improvement at 24-months, reoperation rates, and implant failures were recorded. VAS, IKDC, and WOMET scores were also measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 115 treated patients 3 (2.6%) were either lost to follow-up or missed the 24-month visit, 48 (43%) patients had at least one subsequent surgery, 12 (10.7%) had the implant permanently removed. Of the remaining 100 patients, the mean KOOS pain improved 28.4 points at 24 months (P <0.001), and mean KOOS overall improved 28.3 points (P < 0.001). Seventy-six percent of subjects had mean scores for KOOS pain above the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) threshold, and 72% of subjects met or exceeded this threshold for KOOS overall. There were 29 patients (25.9%) who underwent implant exchange. The 24-month clinical outcomes were similar between subjects who had an implant exchange and patients who did not have any subsequent implant procedure (P < 0.2).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The synthetic medial meniscus demonstrates high reoperation and failure rates. Patients who retained the implant or required implant exchange showed significantly improved pain, function, and quality of life at 24-month follow-up in patients symptomatic following partial medial meniscectomy and failed non-operative management. The high reoperation rate is a concern, and further evaluation is needed to determine any contributing factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.10.033","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes in the use of a synthetic medial meniscus implant in patients symptomatic after medial meniscectomy and not responsive to other treatment methods. and not responded to non-operative treatment.
Methods: This single-arm, multicenter, prospective study enrolled subjects between ages 30-75 with post-meniscectomy pain. Changes from baseline to 24-months were measured in the pain subscale of the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) and in KOOS overall (average of all five subscales) in patients that had received a medial meniscus implant. Success was a 20-point improvement at 24-months, reoperation rates, and implant failures were recorded. VAS, IKDC, and WOMET scores were also measured.
Results: Of the 115 treated patients 3 (2.6%) were either lost to follow-up or missed the 24-month visit, 48 (43%) patients had at least one subsequent surgery, 12 (10.7%) had the implant permanently removed. Of the remaining 100 patients, the mean KOOS pain improved 28.4 points at 24 months (P <0.001), and mean KOOS overall improved 28.3 points (P < 0.001). Seventy-six percent of subjects had mean scores for KOOS pain above the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) threshold, and 72% of subjects met or exceeded this threshold for KOOS overall. There were 29 patients (25.9%) who underwent implant exchange. The 24-month clinical outcomes were similar between subjects who had an implant exchange and patients who did not have any subsequent implant procedure (P < 0.2).
Conclusion: The synthetic medial meniscus demonstrates high reoperation and failure rates. Patients who retained the implant or required implant exchange showed significantly improved pain, function, and quality of life at 24-month follow-up in patients symptomatic following partial medial meniscectomy and failed non-operative management. The high reoperation rate is a concern, and further evaluation is needed to determine any contributing factors.
期刊介绍:
Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.