{"title":"Is it safe to treat osteoporotic burst thoracolumbar fracture using percutaneous vertebroplasty? A minimum of 5-year follow-up study.","authors":"Hsi-Hsien Lin, Pei-I Hung, Kuan-Jung Chen, Wei Hsiung, Ming-Chau Chang","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.10.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Percutaneous vertebroplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic burst fractures remains controversial. A previous study has shown that an osteoporotic burst fracture with asymptomatic spinal canal compromise is not a contraindication for percutaneous vertebroplasty.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine whether these outcomes persist over a long term, we continued to observe patients in their short-term study over a long-term period.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective study.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>Patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures were classified as Dennis type I and II and AO type A1-A4, and no neurological deficits were observed.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Oswestry disability index and visual analog scale (VAS<sup>1</sup>) for pain were outcome measures. Radiological outcomes were vertebral body height and kyphotic angle. Complications included cement leakage, adjacent fractures, and transition to instrumented fusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between June 2015 and December 2016, 96 patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures who met the inclusion criteria were prospectively enrolled. Preoperative, postoperative, and latest follow-up clinical outcomes were assessed using the Oswestry disability index and VAS. The radiological outcomes included vertebral body height, kyphotic angle, and adjacent fractures. Patients with intractable pain and neurological deficits during the follow-up were indicated for surgical treatment using decompression and instrumented fusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-one patients with osteoporotic compression fractures and 45 with osteoporotic burst fractures were included in this study. Mean follow-up duration was 74 months, and posterior vertebral body height, kyphotic wedge angle, and VAS score were not altered during the follow-up period. Three (5.9%) patients in an osteoporotic compression fracture group and three (6.7%) in a osteoporotic burst fracture group developed persistent pain, further collapse, and neurological deficits, and were indicated for surgical treatment. No significant differences were observed in the rates of adjacent fractures. Percentage of patients who required surgical treatment was not significantly different between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Osteoporotic burst fractures with asymptomatic spinal canal compromise treated with percutaneous vertebroplasty are safe and effective for pain management during long-term follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2024.10.019","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background context: Percutaneous vertebroplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic burst fractures remains controversial. A previous study has shown that an osteoporotic burst fracture with asymptomatic spinal canal compromise is not a contraindication for percutaneous vertebroplasty.
Purpose: To determine whether these outcomes persist over a long term, we continued to observe patients in their short-term study over a long-term period.
Study design: Prospective study.
Patient sample: Patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures were classified as Dennis type I and II and AO type A1-A4, and no neurological deficits were observed.
Outcome measures: Oswestry disability index and visual analog scale (VAS1) for pain were outcome measures. Radiological outcomes were vertebral body height and kyphotic angle. Complications included cement leakage, adjacent fractures, and transition to instrumented fusion.
Methods: Between June 2015 and December 2016, 96 patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures who met the inclusion criteria were prospectively enrolled. Preoperative, postoperative, and latest follow-up clinical outcomes were assessed using the Oswestry disability index and VAS. The radiological outcomes included vertebral body height, kyphotic angle, and adjacent fractures. Patients with intractable pain and neurological deficits during the follow-up were indicated for surgical treatment using decompression and instrumented fusion.
Results: Fifty-one patients with osteoporotic compression fractures and 45 with osteoporotic burst fractures were included in this study. Mean follow-up duration was 74 months, and posterior vertebral body height, kyphotic wedge angle, and VAS score were not altered during the follow-up period. Three (5.9%) patients in an osteoporotic compression fracture group and three (6.7%) in a osteoporotic burst fracture group developed persistent pain, further collapse, and neurological deficits, and were indicated for surgical treatment. No significant differences were observed in the rates of adjacent fractures. Percentage of patients who required surgical treatment was not significantly different between the groups.
Conclusions: Osteoporotic burst fractures with asymptomatic spinal canal compromise treated with percutaneous vertebroplasty are safe and effective for pain management during long-term follow-up.
期刊介绍:
The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.