{"title":"Image Features and Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast: Preliminary Findings.","authors":"Weiwei Li, Yingyan Zhao, Xiaochun Fei, Ying Wu, Weiwei Zhan, Wei Zhou, Shujun Xia, Yanyan Song, Jianqiao Zhou","doi":"10.1177/01617346241292032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To explore the image features and the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast. A total of 96 female patients with a solitary and histologically proven DCIS were analyzed retrospectively, and 100 female cases of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) lesions were used as the control group. The Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category of breast lesions was assessed according to conventional ultrasound features. The DCIS lesions were classified into mass type and non-mass type. The CEUS characteristics of these breast lesions were retrospectively analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. The final gold standard was biopsy or surgery with histo-pathological examination. Comparing the ultrasound images of DCIS with that of IDC, there were significant differences in echo pattern, calcification morphology, and calcification distribution (<i>p</i> < .05 for all). There was a significant difference between DCIS and IDC in enhancement intensity, perfusion defects, peripheral high enhancement, intratumoral vessels, and arrival time (AT) (<i>p</i> < .05 for all). In the logistic multivariate regression analysis, two indicators linked with DCIS were recognized: perfusion defects (<i>p</i> = .002) and peripheral high enhancement (<i>p</i> < .001). In forecasting DCIS, the logistic regression equation resulted in an AUC of 0.689, a specificity of 0.720, and a sensitivity of 0.563. CEUS showed differences in enhancement characteristics between DCIS and IDC, with perfusion defects and peripheral high enhancement being associated with DCIS.</p>","PeriodicalId":49401,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasonic Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasonic Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01617346241292032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To explore the image features and the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast. A total of 96 female patients with a solitary and histologically proven DCIS were analyzed retrospectively, and 100 female cases of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) lesions were used as the control group. The Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category of breast lesions was assessed according to conventional ultrasound features. The DCIS lesions were classified into mass type and non-mass type. The CEUS characteristics of these breast lesions were retrospectively analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. The final gold standard was biopsy or surgery with histo-pathological examination. Comparing the ultrasound images of DCIS with that of IDC, there were significant differences in echo pattern, calcification morphology, and calcification distribution (p < .05 for all). There was a significant difference between DCIS and IDC in enhancement intensity, perfusion defects, peripheral high enhancement, intratumoral vessels, and arrival time (AT) (p < .05 for all). In the logistic multivariate regression analysis, two indicators linked with DCIS were recognized: perfusion defects (p = .002) and peripheral high enhancement (p < .001). In forecasting DCIS, the logistic regression equation resulted in an AUC of 0.689, a specificity of 0.720, and a sensitivity of 0.563. CEUS showed differences in enhancement characteristics between DCIS and IDC, with perfusion defects and peripheral high enhancement being associated with DCIS.
目的:探讨对比增强超声(CEUS)对乳腺导管原位癌(DCIS)的图像特征和诊断价值。回顾性分析了96例经组织学证实的单发乳腺导管原位癌(DCIS)女性患者,并以100例浸润性导管癌(IDC)女性病例作为对照组。根据常规超声特征评估乳腺病变的乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)类别。DCIS病变分为肿块型和非肿块型。对这些乳腺病变的 CEUS 特征进行了回顾性定性和定量分析。最终的金标准是活组织检查或组织病理学检查手术。比较 DCIS 与 IDC 的超声图像,两者在回声模式、钙化形态和钙化分布(p p p = .002)以及周围高增强(p p = .003)方面存在显著差异。
期刊介绍:
Ultrasonic Imaging provides rapid publication for original and exceptional papers concerned with the development and application of ultrasonic-imaging technology. Ultrasonic Imaging publishes articles in the following areas: theoretical and experimental aspects of advanced methods and instrumentation for imaging