Knowledge and perceptions of South African blood donors towards biobanking and stool donation.

IF 1.4 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Southern African Journal of Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2024-10-31 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4102/sajid.v39i1.645
Shantelle Claassen-Weitz, Elloise du Toit, Sugnet Gardner-Lubbe, Brian Kullin, Gregory Bellairs, Caroline Hilton, Anika Chicken, Kirsten Welp, Hannah Livingstone, Adrian Brink
{"title":"Knowledge and perceptions of South African blood donors towards biobanking and stool donation.","authors":"Shantelle Claassen-Weitz, Elloise du Toit, Sugnet Gardner-Lubbe, Brian Kullin, Gregory Bellairs, Caroline Hilton, Anika Chicken, Kirsten Welp, Hannah Livingstone, Adrian Brink","doi":"10.4102/sajid.v39i1.645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The complexity of contexts and varied purposes for which biome donation are requested are unknown in South Africa.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to provide strategic data towards actualisation of whether a stool donor bank may be established as a collaborative between Western Cape Blood Services (WCBS) and the University of Cape Town (UCT).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We designed a cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey to determine willingness of WCBS blood donors to donate stool specimens for microbiome biobanking. The study was conducted between 01 June 2022 and 01 July 2022 at three WCBS donation centres in Cape Town, South Africa. Anonymous blood donors who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled. Anonymised demographic and interview data were analysed statistically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of responses from 209/231 blood donors demonstrated in a logistic regression model that compensation (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and 'societal benefit outweighs inconvenience' beliefs (<i>p</i> = 7.751e-05) were covariates significantly associated with willingness to donate stool. Age was borderline significant at a 5% level (<i>p</i> = 0.0556). Most willing stool donors indicated that donating stool samples would not affect blood donations (140/157, 90%). Factors decreasing willingness to donate were stool collection being unpleasant or embarrassing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The survey provides strategic data for the establishment of a stool bank and provided an understanding of the underlying determinants regarding becoming potential donors.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>This is the first report on the perspectives of potential participants in donating samples towards a stool microbiome biobank in South Africa, a necessity for faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT).</p>","PeriodicalId":44007,"journal":{"name":"Southern African Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":"39 1","pages":"645"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11538471/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern African Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajid.v39i1.645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The complexity of contexts and varied purposes for which biome donation are requested are unknown in South Africa.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to provide strategic data towards actualisation of whether a stool donor bank may be established as a collaborative between Western Cape Blood Services (WCBS) and the University of Cape Town (UCT).

Method: We designed a cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey to determine willingness of WCBS blood donors to donate stool specimens for microbiome biobanking. The study was conducted between 01 June 2022 and 01 July 2022 at three WCBS donation centres in Cape Town, South Africa. Anonymous blood donors who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled. Anonymised demographic and interview data were analysed statistically.

Results: Analysis of responses from 209/231 blood donors demonstrated in a logistic regression model that compensation (p < 0.001) and 'societal benefit outweighs inconvenience' beliefs (p = 7.751e-05) were covariates significantly associated with willingness to donate stool. Age was borderline significant at a 5% level (p = 0.0556). Most willing stool donors indicated that donating stool samples would not affect blood donations (140/157, 90%). Factors decreasing willingness to donate were stool collection being unpleasant or embarrassing.

Conclusion: The survey provides strategic data for the establishment of a stool bank and provided an understanding of the underlying determinants regarding becoming potential donors.

Contribution: This is the first report on the perspectives of potential participants in donating samples towards a stool microbiome biobank in South Africa, a necessity for faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT).

南非献血者对生物库和粪便捐献的了解和看法。
背景:在南非,生物群落捐赠请求的复杂背景和不同目的尚不为人知:在南非,生物体捐献的复杂背景和不同目的尚不为人知:本研究的目的是提供战略数据,以确定是否可以通过西开普血液服务机构(WCBS)和开普敦大学(UCT)之间的合作建立粪便捐献者库:我们设计了一项以问卷为基础的横断面调查,以确定 WCBS 献血者是否愿意为微生物组生物库捐献粪便标本。研究于 2022 年 6 月 1 日至 2022 年 7 月 1 日在南非开普敦的三个 WCBS 捐赠中心进行。符合纳入标准的匿名献血者被纳入研究。对匿名的人口统计学和访谈数据进行了统计分析:对 209/231 名献血者的回复进行分析后发现,在逻辑回归模型中,补偿(p < 0.001)和 "社会效益大于不便 "信念(p = 7.751e-05)是与献血意愿显著相关的协变量。年龄在 5%的水平上具有边缘显著性(p = 0.0556)。大多数愿意捐献粪便者表示捐献粪便样本不会影响献血(140/157,90%)。降低捐献意愿的因素是粪便采集不愉快或令人尴尬:该调查为建立粪便库提供了战略性数据,并让人们了解了成为潜在捐献者的基本决定因素:这是第一份关于潜在参与者为南非粪便微生物组生物库捐赠样本的观点的报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
11.10%
发文量
50
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信