Utility of diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions.

IF 0.7 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
SA Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2024-10-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4102/sajr.v28i1.2952
Allen Johnson, Radha Sarawagi, Rajesh Malik, Jitendra Sharma, Abhinav Bhagat
{"title":"Utility of diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions.","authors":"Allen Johnson, Radha Sarawagi, Rajesh Malik, Jitendra Sharma, Abhinav Bhagat","doi":"10.4102/sajr.v28i1.2952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer presents a significant global health burden. An accurate differentiation between benign and malignant lesions is imperative for timely intervention. While dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) is highly sensitive, its specificity is limited. This has led to the exploration of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in distinguishing between benign and malignant breast lesions.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study aimed to explore the diagnostic utility of DWI in distinguishing between benign and malignant breast lesions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Assessment of 38 breast lesions using DWI with a <i>b</i> value of 800 s/mm<sup>2</sup>, performed with 3 Tesla MRI. The diagnostic performance of two different region of Interest (ROI) placement approaches was compared to obtain a feasible cut-off value of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) to differentiate between malignant and benign lesions. The histopathological reports were used as the gold standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ADC values of malignant lesions were significantly lower than those of benign lesions (0.84 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s vs. 1.54 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s). The average ADC measured using a small-sized 2D ROI including the darkest part in the ADC map, performed better than the large 2D ROI covering the entire lesion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using a cut-off value of 0.98 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s, ADC obtained high sensitivity (90%) and specificity (88.9%) in distinguishing between benign and malignant breast lesions.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>Utilising quantitative analysis of DWI with ADC value measurement, reliably distinguished between benign and malignant breast lesions in this cohort, especially when employing a higher <i>b</i> value of 800 s/mm<sup>2</sup>.</p>","PeriodicalId":43442,"journal":{"name":"SA Journal of Radiology","volume":"28 1","pages":"2952"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11538155/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SA Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajr.v28i1.2952","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer presents a significant global health burden. An accurate differentiation between benign and malignant lesions is imperative for timely intervention. While dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) is highly sensitive, its specificity is limited. This has led to the exploration of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in distinguishing between benign and malignant breast lesions.

Objectives: The study aimed to explore the diagnostic utility of DWI in distinguishing between benign and malignant breast lesions.

Method: Assessment of 38 breast lesions using DWI with a b value of 800 s/mm2, performed with 3 Tesla MRI. The diagnostic performance of two different region of Interest (ROI) placement approaches was compared to obtain a feasible cut-off value of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) to differentiate between malignant and benign lesions. The histopathological reports were used as the gold standard.

Results: ADC values of malignant lesions were significantly lower than those of benign lesions (0.84 × 10-3 mm2/s vs. 1.54 × 10-3 mm2/s). The average ADC measured using a small-sized 2D ROI including the darkest part in the ADC map, performed better than the large 2D ROI covering the entire lesion.

Conclusion: Using a cut-off value of 0.98 × 10-3 mm2/s, ADC obtained high sensitivity (90%) and specificity (88.9%) in distinguishing between benign and malignant breast lesions.

Contribution: Utilising quantitative analysis of DWI with ADC value measurement, reliably distinguished between benign and malignant breast lesions in this cohort, especially when employing a higher b value of 800 s/mm2.

弥散加权成像在区分乳腺良性和恶性病变方面的实用性。
背景:乳腺癌给全球健康带来沉重负担。准确区分良性和恶性病变是及时干预的当务之急。虽然动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)的灵敏度很高,但其特异性有限。因此,人们开始探索用弥散加权成像(DWI)来区分乳腺良性和恶性病变:本研究旨在探讨 DWI 在区分乳腺良性和恶性病变方面的诊断效用:方法:使用3特斯拉磁共振成像技术,以800 s/mm2的b值对38个乳腺病变进行评估。比较了两种不同感兴趣区(ROI)放置方法的诊断性能,以获得区分恶性和良性病变的可行的表观弥散系数(ADC)临界值。组织病理学报告被用作金标准:结果:恶性病变的 ADC 值明显低于良性病变(0.84 × 10-3 mm2/s vs. 1.54 × 10-3 mm2/s)。使用包括ADC图中最暗部分的小尺寸二维ROI测量的平均ADC比覆盖整个病变的大尺寸二维ROI效果更好:结论:以 0.98 × 10-3 mm2/s 为临界值,ADC 在区分乳腺良性和恶性病变方面具有较高的灵敏度(90%)和特异性(88.9%):贡献:利用 ADC 值测量对 DWI 进行定量分析,能可靠地区分良性和恶性乳腺病变,尤其是在使用 800 s/mm2 的较高 b 值时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SA Journal of Radiology
SA Journal of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The SA Journal of Radiology is the official journal of the Radiological Society of South Africa and the Professional Association of Radiologists in South Africa and Namibia. The SA Journal of Radiology is a general diagnostic radiological journal which carries original research and review articles, pictorial essays, case reports, letters, editorials, radiological practice and other radiological articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信