Impact of a Disease-Focused Electronic Health Record Dashboard on Clinical Staff Efficiency in Previsit Patient Review in an Ambulatory Pulmonary Hypertension Care Clinic.
Tapendra Koirala, Charles D Burger, Rajeev Chaudhry, Patricia Benitez, Heather A Heaton, Nilaa Gopikrishnan, Scott A Helgeson
{"title":"Impact of a Disease-Focused Electronic Health Record Dashboard on Clinical Staff Efficiency in Previsit Patient Review in an Ambulatory Pulmonary Hypertension Care Clinic.","authors":"Tapendra Koirala, Charles D Burger, Rajeev Chaudhry, Patricia Benitez, Heather A Heaton, Nilaa Gopikrishnan, Scott A Helgeson","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1790552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong> We aimed to improve the operational efficiency of clinical staff, including physicians and allied health professionals, in the previsit review of patients by implementing a disease-focused dashboard within the electronic health record system. The dashboard was tailored to the unique requirements of the clinic and patient population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> A prospective quality improvement study was conducted at an accredited pulmonary hypertension (PH) clinic within a large academic center, staffed by two full time physicians and two allied health professionals. Physicians' review time before and after implementation of the PH dashboard was measured using activity log data derived from an EHR database. The review time for clinic staff was measured through direct observation, with review method-either conventional or newly implemented dashboard-randomly assigned.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Over the study period, the median number of patients reviewed by physicians per day increased slightly from 5.50 (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.35) before to 5.95 (IQR: 0.85) after the implementation of the PH dashboard (<i>p</i> = 0.535). The median review time for the physicians decreased with the use of the dashboard, from 7.0 minutes (IQR: 1.55) to 4.95 minutes (IQR: 1.35; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Based on the observed timing of 70 patient encounters among allied clinical staff, no significant difference was found for experienced members (4.65 minutes [IQR: 2.02] vs. 4.43 minutes [IQR: 0.69], <i>p</i> = 0.752), while inexperienced staff saw a significant reduction in review time after familiarization with the dashboard (5.06 minutes [IQR: 1.51] vs. 4.12 minutes [IQR: 1.99], <i>p</i> = 0.034). Subjective feedback highlighted the need for further optimization of the dashboard to align with the workflow of allied health staff to achieve similar efficiency benefits.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> A disease-focused dashboard significantly reduced physician previsit review time while that for clinic staff remained unchanged. Validation studies are necessary with our patient populations to explore further qualitative impacts on patient care efficiency and long-term benefits on workflow.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":"15 5","pages":"928-938"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540472/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1790552","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: We aimed to improve the operational efficiency of clinical staff, including physicians and allied health professionals, in the previsit review of patients by implementing a disease-focused dashboard within the electronic health record system. The dashboard was tailored to the unique requirements of the clinic and patient population.
Methods: A prospective quality improvement study was conducted at an accredited pulmonary hypertension (PH) clinic within a large academic center, staffed by two full time physicians and two allied health professionals. Physicians' review time before and after implementation of the PH dashboard was measured using activity log data derived from an EHR database. The review time for clinic staff was measured through direct observation, with review method-either conventional or newly implemented dashboard-randomly assigned.
Results: Over the study period, the median number of patients reviewed by physicians per day increased slightly from 5.50 (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.35) before to 5.95 (IQR: 0.85) after the implementation of the PH dashboard (p = 0.535). The median review time for the physicians decreased with the use of the dashboard, from 7.0 minutes (IQR: 1.55) to 4.95 minutes (IQR: 1.35; p < 0.001). Based on the observed timing of 70 patient encounters among allied clinical staff, no significant difference was found for experienced members (4.65 minutes [IQR: 2.02] vs. 4.43 minutes [IQR: 0.69], p = 0.752), while inexperienced staff saw a significant reduction in review time after familiarization with the dashboard (5.06 minutes [IQR: 1.51] vs. 4.12 minutes [IQR: 1.99], p = 0.034). Subjective feedback highlighted the need for further optimization of the dashboard to align with the workflow of allied health staff to achieve similar efficiency benefits.
Conclusion: A disease-focused dashboard significantly reduced physician previsit review time while that for clinic staff remained unchanged. Validation studies are necessary with our patient populations to explore further qualitative impacts on patient care efficiency and long-term benefits on workflow.
期刊介绍：
ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
