Development and validation of a predictive scoring model for complications following endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery.

Abstract

Objective: The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) has evolved into an established technique in skull base surgery. The authors previously examined 1002 EEA procedures and reported factors associated with postoperative complications. Here they report the development and validation of a scoring model based on risk factors to better predict complications following EEA.

Methods: The authors developed an optimized EEA scoring model for predicting postoperative complications as evidenced by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve using their previously published data in addition to data collected from the subsequent 292 EEA procedures from years 2010-2020. The model was built systematically by evaluating the contributions that different variables had on the overall predictive ability of the model. The aim was to design a model containing as few variables as possible for practicality and to facilitate calculation and use at the bedside. The Clavien-Dindo grading system was used to classify complications into grades I-V based on the level of intervention that was required to manage the complication, with grades III-V considered to be higher-grade (i.e., those requiring reoperation or ICU-level care or death).

Results: The authors identified 1294 EEA operations performed between July 2010 and July 2020 that met their inclusion criteria. Higher-grade complications were identified following 135 EEA operations. The variables that were ultimately included in the model were age, BMI, operative time, meningioma, chordoma, expanded intradural approach, and nasoseptal flap use. The final model yielded an acceptable AUROC curve of 0.72 and predicted a stepwise increase in the rate of higher-grade complications as the score increased. A score of 0-2 (low) on the grading system was associated with an average complication rate of 5.1%. A score of 3-5 (medium) was associated with an average complication rate of 12.6%. A score of 6 or above (high) was associated with an average complication rate of 26%.

Conclusions: This EEA complications scoring model accurately categorizes patients into low-, medium-, and high-risk groups with readily obtained variables. A high score in this complications model does not suggest that a patient is ineligible for surgery, but rather highlights the importance of thorough case selection, operating with caution, and appropriate preoperative counseling.