Healthcare Resource Utilization Among Patients With Agitation in Alzheimer Dementia.

IF 2.3 Q2 ECONOMICS
Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2024-10-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.36469/001c.124455
Christie Teigland, Zulkarnain Pulungan, David Bruhn, Steve Hwang
{"title":"Healthcare Resource Utilization Among Patients With Agitation in Alzheimer Dementia.","authors":"Christie Teigland, Zulkarnain Pulungan, David Bruhn, Steve Hwang","doi":"10.36469/001c.124455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Agitation in Alzheimer dementia is common, but the associated healthcare burden remains unclear. <b>Objective:</b> This retrospective analysis evaluated baseline characteristics, healthcare resource utilization, and costs among patients with agitation in Alzheimer dementia and those without agitation in Alzheimer dementia. <b>Methods:</b> Medicare beneficiaries from 100% of the Medicare Fee-for-Service claims database (2009-2016) with 2 or more claims 30 or more days apart for both Alzheimer's disease and dementia and continuous enrollment with medical/pharmacy coverage for 6 months before and 12 months after the index diagnosis were included. Patients with agitation in Alzheimer dementia were identified by 2 or more claims 14 or more days apart using <i>International Classification of Diseases-9-CM/-10-CM</i> codes based on the provisional International Psychogeriatric Association agitation definition. Patients with severe psychiatric disorders were excluded. Two cohorts of patients (with and without agitation) were then defined, and patient characteristics, healthcare resource utilization, and costs were compared in a descriptive exploratory analysis. <b>Results:</b> Of 2 684 704 Fee-for-Service patients with Alzheimer dementia, 769 141 met all inclusion criteria; among these, 281 042 (36.5%) had agitation. The mean age in patients with and without agitation in Alzheimer dementia was 83 years. Most patients in both groups were female, but the proportion of males was slightly higher in the agitation in Alzheimer dementia group (30.3% vs 28.2%, respectively). Patients with agitation in Alzheimer dementia were more likely than those without agitation in Alzheimer dementia to have lower socioeconomic status (dual eligibility for Medicaid, 45.0% vs 41.7%, respectively) or be disabled (10.5% vs 9.4%). Overall, healthcare costs were higher in the agitation in Alzheimer dementia population compared with those without agitation in Alzheimer dementia (mean cost PPPY, <math><mn>32</mn> <mrow><mo> </mo></mrow> <mn>322</mn> <mi>a</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>d</mi></math> 30 121, respectively), with the largest differences observed in inpatient and post-acute care costs. <b>Conclusions:</b> These exploratory findings underscore the substantial economic burden of agitation in Alzheimer dementia and highlight the need for treatment options for the agitation in Alzheimer dementia population to improve associated health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"11 2","pages":"118-124"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11539929/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36469/001c.124455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Agitation in Alzheimer dementia is common, but the associated healthcare burden remains unclear. Objective: This retrospective analysis evaluated baseline characteristics, healthcare resource utilization, and costs among patients with agitation in Alzheimer dementia and those without agitation in Alzheimer dementia. Methods: Medicare beneficiaries from 100% of the Medicare Fee-for-Service claims database (2009-2016) with 2 or more claims 30 or more days apart for both Alzheimer's disease and dementia and continuous enrollment with medical/pharmacy coverage for 6 months before and 12 months after the index diagnosis were included. Patients with agitation in Alzheimer dementia were identified by 2 or more claims 14 or more days apart using International Classification of Diseases-9-CM/-10-CM codes based on the provisional International Psychogeriatric Association agitation definition. Patients with severe psychiatric disorders were excluded. Two cohorts of patients (with and without agitation) were then defined, and patient characteristics, healthcare resource utilization, and costs were compared in a descriptive exploratory analysis. Results: Of 2 684 704 Fee-for-Service patients with Alzheimer dementia, 769 141 met all inclusion criteria; among these, 281 042 (36.5%) had agitation. The mean age in patients with and without agitation in Alzheimer dementia was 83 years. Most patients in both groups were female, but the proportion of males was slightly higher in the agitation in Alzheimer dementia group (30.3% vs 28.2%, respectively). Patients with agitation in Alzheimer dementia were more likely than those without agitation in Alzheimer dementia to have lower socioeconomic status (dual eligibility for Medicaid, 45.0% vs 41.7%, respectively) or be disabled (10.5% vs 9.4%). Overall, healthcare costs were higher in the agitation in Alzheimer dementia population compared with those without agitation in Alzheimer dementia (mean cost PPPY, 32 322 a n d 30 121, respectively), with the largest differences observed in inpatient and post-acute care costs. Conclusions: These exploratory findings underscore the substantial economic burden of agitation in Alzheimer dementia and highlight the need for treatment options for the agitation in Alzheimer dementia population to improve associated health outcomes.

阿尔茨海默型痴呆症躁动患者的医疗资源使用情况。
背景:阿尔茨海默型痴呆症患者的躁动很常见,但相关的医疗负担仍不清楚。目的: 本回顾性分析评估了阿尔茨海默氏症躁动患者的基线特征、医疗资源利用率和成本:这项回顾性分析评估了阿尔茨海默型痴呆症躁动患者和无躁动患者的基线特征、医疗资源利用率和费用。方法:纳入100%的医疗保险付费服务索赔数据库(2009-2016年)中的医疗保险受益人,这些受益人须同时患有阿尔茨海默病和痴呆症,且在确诊前6个月和确诊后12个月内连续投保医疗/药物保险,且索赔时间相隔30天或以上。阿尔茨海默氏症痴呆症患者中的躁动患者是根据国际老年心理协会的临时躁动定义,使用国际疾病分类-9-CM/-10-CM 编码,通过相隔 14 天或更长时间的 2 份或更多索赔来确定的。患有严重精神障碍的患者除外。然后定义了两组患者(有躁动和无躁动),并在描述性探索分析中比较了患者特征、医疗资源利用率和成本。研究结果在 2 684 704 名付费服务的阿尔茨海默痴呆症患者中,有 769 141 人符合所有纳入标准;其中有 281042 人(36.5%)有躁动。阿尔茨海默氏症痴呆症患者的平均年龄为 83 岁。两组患者中大多数为女性,但阿尔茨海默型痴呆患者中男性比例略高(分别为 30.3% 和 28.2%)。与阿尔茨海默型痴呆症患者相比,阿尔茨海默型痴呆症激越症患者更有可能社会经济地位较低(分别为 45.0% 对 41.7%)或身患残疾(10.5% 对 9.4%)。总体而言,阿尔茨海默型痴呆症患者的医疗费用高于无阿尔茨海默型痴呆症患者(PPPY 平均费用分别为 32 322 美元和 30 121 美元),其中住院和急性期后护理费用的差异最大。结论:这些探索性发现强调了阿尔茨海默型痴呆症患者躁动所造成的巨大经济负担,并突出表明有必要为阿尔茨海默型痴呆症患者提供治疗方案,以改善相关的健康状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信