The Distress and Benefits of the Bereaved Family Survey: A Mortality Follow-Back Survey.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Mai Hosokawa, Yoko Nakazawa, Mitsunori Miyashita, Kento Masukawa, Momoka Sato, Tatsuya Morita, Yasuyiki Okumura, Yoshiyuki Kizawa, Shohei Kawagoe, Hiroshi Yamamoto, Emi Takeuchi, Risa Yamazaki, Asao Ogawa
{"title":"The Distress and Benefits of the Bereaved Family Survey: A Mortality Follow-Back Survey.","authors":"Mai Hosokawa, Yoko Nakazawa, Mitsunori Miyashita, Kento Masukawa, Momoka Sato, Tatsuya Morita, Yasuyiki Okumura, Yoshiyuki Kizawa, Shohei Kawagoe, Hiroshi Yamamoto, Emi Takeuchi, Risa Yamazaki, Asao Ogawa","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.10.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>The Bereaved Family Survey is an important method for evaluating the quality of palliative care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the distress and benefits of bereaved families of patients with or without cancer, who participated in a Bereaved Family Survey, and identify factors associated with distress and benefits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional, self-reported questionnaire mail survey among the bereaved families of patients who died of cancer, heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, pneumonia, or kidney failure. Participants answered questions on a four-point Likert scale measuring the distress and benefit associated with participating in the Bereaved Family Survey. We conducted a qualitative analysis of responses to open-ended questions about the distress and benefits of participating in the survey to comprehensively examine the distress and benefits of participating in the survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Questionnaires were distributed to 115,816 eligible bereaved family members between February 2019 and February 2020; 62,576 (54.0%) family members returned valid responses. Distress and benefits accounted for 51.4% and 49.3%, respectively. The results of the binomial logistic analysis for distress were significantly higher among cancer patients (P < 0.001-0.003), 20-39-year-old patients (P < 0.001), female bereaved family members (P < 0.001), and bereaved family members with poor mental health statuses (P < 0.001). Factors related to \"benefit\" were significantly higher among over-80-year-old bereaved family members (P < 0.001), higher care evaluation scale (CES) scores (P < 0.001), and higher good death inventory (GDI) scores (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bereaved family members experience both distress and benefits. There is need to devise ways to reduce distress and increase its benefits to continue assessing the quality of palliative care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":" ","pages":"152-164"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.10.029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: The Bereaved Family Survey is an important method for evaluating the quality of palliative care.

Objectives: To examine the distress and benefits of bereaved families of patients with or without cancer, who participated in a Bereaved Family Survey, and identify factors associated with distress and benefits.

Methods: We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional, self-reported questionnaire mail survey among the bereaved families of patients who died of cancer, heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, pneumonia, or kidney failure. Participants answered questions on a four-point Likert scale measuring the distress and benefit associated with participating in the Bereaved Family Survey. We conducted a qualitative analysis of responses to open-ended questions about the distress and benefits of participating in the survey to comprehensively examine the distress and benefits of participating in the survey.

Results: Questionnaires were distributed to 115,816 eligible bereaved family members between February 2019 and February 2020; 62,576 (54.0%) family members returned valid responses. Distress and benefits accounted for 51.4% and 49.3%, respectively. The results of the binomial logistic analysis for distress were significantly higher among cancer patients (P < 0.001-0.003), 20-39-year-old patients (P < 0.001), female bereaved family members (P < 0.001), and bereaved family members with poor mental health statuses (P < 0.001). Factors related to "benefit" were significantly higher among over-80-year-old bereaved family members (P < 0.001), higher care evaluation scale (CES) scores (P < 0.001), and higher good death inventory (GDI) scores (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Bereaved family members experience both distress and benefits. There is need to devise ways to reduce distress and increase its benefits to continue assessing the quality of palliative care.

丧亲家庭调查的苦恼和益处:死亡率跟踪调查。
背景:遗属调查是评估姑息关怀质量的重要方法:研究参加遗属调查的癌症病人或非癌症病人遗属的痛苦和获益,并确定与痛苦和获益相关的因素:我们对死于癌症、心脏病、脑血管疾病、肺炎或肾衰竭的患者遗属进行了一次全国范围的横断面自我报告问卷邮寄调查。参加者用李克特四点量表回答了与参加遗属调查相关的痛苦和益处问题。我们对有关参与调查的痛苦和益处的开放式问题的回答进行了定性分析,以全面了解参与调查的痛苦和益处:在 2019 年 2 月至 2020 年 2 月期间,我们向 115,816 名符合条件的丧亲家属发放了调查问卷;62,576 名(54.0%)家属交回了有效答卷。苦恼和福利分别占 51.4% 和 49.3%。二项logistic分析结果显示,癌症患者的痛苦程度明显更高(p结论:丧亲家属既感到痛苦,又能从中受益。有必要制定减少痛苦和增加获益的方法,以继续评估姑息关怀的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.40%
发文量
821
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信