Strategies to Mitigate the Pandemic Aftermath on Perioperative Professionalism.

IF 2.3 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Crystal C Wright, Maureen D Triller, Anne S Tsao, Stephanie A Zajac, Cindy Segal, Elizabeth P Ninan, Jenise B Rice, William O Cooper, Carin A Hagberg, Mark W Clemens
{"title":"Strategies to Mitigate the Pandemic Aftermath on Perioperative Professionalism.","authors":"Crystal C Wright, Maureen D Triller, Anne S Tsao, Stephanie A Zajac, Cindy Segal, Elizabeth P Ninan, Jenise B Rice, William O Cooper, Carin A Hagberg, Mark W Clemens","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This retrospective comparative cohort study aimed to evaluate the effects of COVID-19 on professionalism within the perioperative environment of a tertiary cancer center across three periods: pre-pandemic, pandemic, and an interventional endemic phase.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational review of a prospectively maintained safety event report (SER) database at MD Anderson Cancer Center, with an intervention during the COVID-19 endemic phase, was conducted. This was performed to compare the incidence of professionalism-related events (PRE), which are included in the SER database, during the COVID-19 pandemic period (March 2020 to May 2022), with a pre-pandemic period (September 2011 to February 2020) and a postintervention endemic phase (June 2022 to March 2023). Study interventions included the application of the Vanderbilt Professionalism Escalation Model with broad staff and surgical team education.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 17,425 SERs were reviewed. Of these, 11,731 (mean 115.0 SERs/month) were reported in the pre-pandemic period, 4,004 SERs (mean 148.3 SERs/month) in the pandemic period, and 1,690 SERs (mean 169.0 SERs/month) in the endemic phase (p = 0.001). There was a statistically significant increase in the incidence of PRE during the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic and endemic periods. Specifically, 264 PRE (1.5%) were identified during the study period: 114 PRE (mean 1.1 PRE/month) in the pre-pandemic period, 121 PRE (mean 4.5 PRE/month) in the pandemic period, and 29 PRE (mean 2.9 PRE/month) in the endemic phase (p = 0.001). The increase in PRE during the pandemic period corresponded to a concomitant increase in staff turnover rates (15.5%) compared to the pre-pandemic period (8.3%). However, a time shift of four months into the postintervention endemic phase demonstrated a successful reduction to less than pre-pandemic levels of staff turnover (6.7%, p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a significant increase in SERs describing professionalism lapses among health care providers in the perioperative environment. Hospital organizations must recognize the impact of professionalism on morale and turnover and seek to mitigate its effects. Education, promoting individual accountability, confidential reporting, addressing wellness concerns, and providing modes of resilience can enhance workplace culture and potentially cultivate better employee retention rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":14835,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.09.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This retrospective comparative cohort study aimed to evaluate the effects of COVID-19 on professionalism within the perioperative environment of a tertiary cancer center across three periods: pre-pandemic, pandemic, and an interventional endemic phase.

Methods: A retrospective observational review of a prospectively maintained safety event report (SER) database at MD Anderson Cancer Center, with an intervention during the COVID-19 endemic phase, was conducted. This was performed to compare the incidence of professionalism-related events (PRE), which are included in the SER database, during the COVID-19 pandemic period (March 2020 to May 2022), with a pre-pandemic period (September 2011 to February 2020) and a postintervention endemic phase (June 2022 to March 2023). Study interventions included the application of the Vanderbilt Professionalism Escalation Model with broad staff and surgical team education.

Results: During the study period, 17,425 SERs were reviewed. Of these, 11,731 (mean 115.0 SERs/month) were reported in the pre-pandemic period, 4,004 SERs (mean 148.3 SERs/month) in the pandemic period, and 1,690 SERs (mean 169.0 SERs/month) in the endemic phase (p = 0.001). There was a statistically significant increase in the incidence of PRE during the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic and endemic periods. Specifically, 264 PRE (1.5%) were identified during the study period: 114 PRE (mean 1.1 PRE/month) in the pre-pandemic period, 121 PRE (mean 4.5 PRE/month) in the pandemic period, and 29 PRE (mean 2.9 PRE/month) in the endemic phase (p = 0.001). The increase in PRE during the pandemic period corresponded to a concomitant increase in staff turnover rates (15.5%) compared to the pre-pandemic period (8.3%). However, a time shift of four months into the postintervention endemic phase demonstrated a successful reduction to less than pre-pandemic levels of staff turnover (6.7%, p = 0.001).

Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a significant increase in SERs describing professionalism lapses among health care providers in the perioperative environment. Hospital organizations must recognize the impact of professionalism on morale and turnover and seek to mitigate its effects. Education, promoting individual accountability, confidential reporting, addressing wellness concerns, and providing modes of resilience can enhance workplace culture and potentially cultivate better employee retention rates.

减轻大流行病对围术期专业精神影响的策略。
背景:这项回顾性队列比较研究旨在评估 COVID-19 在一个三级癌症中心围手术期环境中对职业精神的影响,包括三个时期:流行前、流行期和干预流行期:对 MD 安德森癌症中心前瞻性维护的安全事件报告(SER)数据库进行了回顾性观察,在 COVID-19 流行阶段进行了干预。这项研究旨在比较 COVID-19 大流行期间(2020 年 3 月至 2022 年 5 月)、大流行前阶段(2011 年 9 月至 2020 年 2 月)和干预后流行阶段(2022 年 6 月至 2023 年 3 月)专业相关事件 (PRE) 的发生率,SER 数据库中包含了专业相关事件 (PRE)。研究干预措施包括应用范德比尔特职业素养提升模式,广泛开展员工和手术团队教育:在研究期间,共审查了 17425 份 SER。其中,大流行前报告了 11,731 例 SER(平均 115.0 例/月),大流行期间报告了 4,004 例 SER(平均 148.3 例/月),大流行阶段报告了 1,690 例 SER(平均 169.0 例/月)(p = 0.001)。与大流行前和流行期相比,大流行期间 PRE 的发生率在统计学上有显著增加。具体来说,在研究期间发现了 264 例 PRE(1.5%):大流行前有 114 例 PRE(平均 1.1 例/月),大流行期间有 121 例 PRE(平均 4.5 例/月),流行期有 29 例 PRE(平均 2.9 例/月)(P = 0.001)。与疫情流行前(8.3%)相比,疫情流行期间 PRE 的增加与工作人员流失率(15.5%)的增加相对应。然而,在进入干预后流行阶段的四个月后,员工流失率成功降至低于流行前水平(6.7%,p = 0.001):结论:COVID-19 大流行与围术期环境中医护人员职业素养缺失的 SER 显著增加有关。医院组织必须认识到职业精神对士气和人员流动的影响,并设法减轻其影响。教育、促进个人责任感、保密报告、解决健康问题以及提供抗压模式都可以加强工作场所文化,并有可能提高员工保留率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
49 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信