Simulation of hip bony range of motion (BROM) corresponds to the observed functional range of motion (FROM) for pure flexion, internal rotation in deep flexion, and external rotation in minimal flexion-extension - A cadaver study.

IF 7 2区 医学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Arnab Palit, Mark A Williams, Ercihan Kiraci, Vineet Seemala, Vatsal Gupta, Jim Pierrepont, Christopher Plaskos, Richard King
{"title":"Simulation of hip bony range of motion (BROM) corresponds to the observed functional range of motion (FROM) for pure flexion, internal rotation in deep flexion, and external rotation in minimal flexion-extension - A cadaver study.","authors":"Arnab Palit, Mark A Williams, Ercihan Kiraci, Vineet Seemala, Vatsal Gupta, Jim Pierrepont, Christopher Plaskos, Richard King","doi":"10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The study investigated the relationship between computed bony range of motion (BROM) and actual functional range of motion (FROM) as directly measured in cadaveric hips. The hypothesis was that some hip movements are not substantially restricted by soft tissues, and therefore, computed BROM for these movements may effectively represent FROM, providing a reliable parameter for computational pre-operative planning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Maximum passive FROM was measured in nine cadaveric hips using optical tracking. Each hip was measured in at least ninety FROM positions, covering flexion, extension, abduction, flexion-internal rotation (IR), flexion-external rotation (ER), extension-IR, and extension-ER movements. The measured FROM was virtually recreated using 3D models of the femur and pelvis derived from CT scans, and the corresponding BROM was computed. The relationship between FROM and BROM was classified into three groups: close (mean difference<5°), moderate (mean difference 5-15°), and weak (mean difference>15°).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The relationship between FROM and BROM was close for pure flexion (difference = 3.1° ± 3.9°) and IR in deep (>70°) flexion (difference = 4.3° ± 4.6°). The relationship was moderate for ER in minimal flexion (difference = 10.3° ± 5.8°) and ER in minimal extension (difference = 11.7° ± 7.2°). Bony impingement was observed in some cases during these movements. Other movements showed a weak relationship: large differences were observed in extension (51.9° ± 14.4°), abduction (18.6° ± 11.3°), flexion-IR at flexion<70° (37.1° ± 9.4°), extension-IR (79.6° ± 4.8°), flexion-ER at flexion>30° (45.9° ± 11.3°), and extension-ER at extension>20° (15.8° ± 4.8°).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BROM simulations of hip flexion, IR in deep flexion, and ER in low flexion/extension may be useful in dynamic pre-operative planning of total hip arthroplasty.</p>","PeriodicalId":10578,"journal":{"name":"Computers in biology and medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in biology and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109270","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The study investigated the relationship between computed bony range of motion (BROM) and actual functional range of motion (FROM) as directly measured in cadaveric hips. The hypothesis was that some hip movements are not substantially restricted by soft tissues, and therefore, computed BROM for these movements may effectively represent FROM, providing a reliable parameter for computational pre-operative planning.

Methods: Maximum passive FROM was measured in nine cadaveric hips using optical tracking. Each hip was measured in at least ninety FROM positions, covering flexion, extension, abduction, flexion-internal rotation (IR), flexion-external rotation (ER), extension-IR, and extension-ER movements. The measured FROM was virtually recreated using 3D models of the femur and pelvis derived from CT scans, and the corresponding BROM was computed. The relationship between FROM and BROM was classified into three groups: close (mean difference<5°), moderate (mean difference 5-15°), and weak (mean difference>15°).

Results: The relationship between FROM and BROM was close for pure flexion (difference = 3.1° ± 3.9°) and IR in deep (>70°) flexion (difference = 4.3° ± 4.6°). The relationship was moderate for ER in minimal flexion (difference = 10.3° ± 5.8°) and ER in minimal extension (difference = 11.7° ± 7.2°). Bony impingement was observed in some cases during these movements. Other movements showed a weak relationship: large differences were observed in extension (51.9° ± 14.4°), abduction (18.6° ± 11.3°), flexion-IR at flexion<70° (37.1° ± 9.4°), extension-IR (79.6° ± 4.8°), flexion-ER at flexion>30° (45.9° ± 11.3°), and extension-ER at extension>20° (15.8° ± 4.8°).

Conclusion: BROM simulations of hip flexion, IR in deep flexion, and ER in low flexion/extension may be useful in dynamic pre-operative planning of total hip arthroplasty.

模拟髋关节骨性运动范围(BROM)与观察到的纯屈、深屈内旋和微屈伸外旋的功能性运动范围(FROM)相对应--一项尸体研究。
背景:该研究调查了计算出的骨性活动范围(BROM)与在尸体髋关节中直接测量出的实际功能性活动范围(FROM)之间的关系。假设某些髋关节运动不会受到软组织的实质性限制,因此这些运动的计算骨性活动范围可有效代表功能性活动范围,为计算术前计划提供可靠的参数:方法:使用光学跟踪测量九个尸体髋关节的最大被动 FROM。每个髋关节至少在九十个 FROM 位置进行了测量,包括屈曲、伸展、外展、屈曲-内旋(IR)、屈曲-外旋(ER)、伸展-IR 和伸展-ER 运动。测量出的FROM通过CT扫描获得的股骨和骨盆三维模型进行虚拟再现,并计算出相应的BROM。FROM和BROM之间的关系分为三组:接近组(平均相差15°):结果:纯屈曲(差值=3.1° ± 3.9°)和深屈曲(>70°)时的IR(差值=4.3° ± 4.6°)的FROM和BROM关系密切。最小屈曲时的ER(差异= 10.3° ± 5.8°)和最小伸展时的ER(差异= 11.7° ± 7.2°)关系适中。在这些运动中,有些病例出现了骨性撞击。其他动作显示出微弱的关系:在伸展(51.9°±14.4°)、外展(18.6°±11.3°)、屈曲 30°时的屈曲-IR(45.9°±11.3°)和伸展>20°时的伸展-ER(15.8°±4.8°)中观察到较大差异:BROM模拟髋关节屈曲、深屈时的IR和低屈/伸展时的ER可能有助于全髋关节置换术的动态术前规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers in biology and medicine
Computers in biology and medicine 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
10.40%
发文量
1086
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Biology and Medicine is an international forum for sharing groundbreaking advancements in the use of computers in bioscience and medicine. This journal serves as a medium for communicating essential research, instruction, ideas, and information regarding the rapidly evolving field of computer applications in these domains. By encouraging the exchange of knowledge, we aim to facilitate progress and innovation in the utilization of computers in biology and medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信