Improvement of fatigue, depression, and processing speed two weeks post Natalizumab infusion in Multiple Sclerosis: No difference between standard and extended interval dosing schedules

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Giorgio Leodori , Marco Mancuso , Davide Maccarrone , Matteo Tartaglia , Antonio Ianniello , Viola Baione , Gina Ferrazzano , Leonardo Malimpensa , Daniele Belvisi , Alfredo Berardelli , Carlo Pozzilli , Antonella Conte
{"title":"Improvement of fatigue, depression, and processing speed two weeks post Natalizumab infusion in Multiple Sclerosis: No difference between standard and extended interval dosing schedules","authors":"Giorgio Leodori ,&nbsp;Marco Mancuso ,&nbsp;Davide Maccarrone ,&nbsp;Matteo Tartaglia ,&nbsp;Antonio Ianniello ,&nbsp;Viola Baione ,&nbsp;Gina Ferrazzano ,&nbsp;Leonardo Malimpensa ,&nbsp;Daniele Belvisi ,&nbsp;Alfredo Berardelli ,&nbsp;Carlo Pozzilli ,&nbsp;Antonella Conte","doi":"10.1016/j.msard.2024.106146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Fatigue, depression and slow processing speed are debilitating symptoms in people with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) that significantly impacts on the quality of life. Natalizumab, a disease-modifying treatment, improves clinical symptoms but questions remain about the comparative efficacy between its standard interval dosing (SID) and extended interval dosing (EID) schedules.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To examine the impact of short term natalizumab dosing schedules—SID versus EID—on the so called “invisible symptoms”, specifically focusing on symptom exacerbation during the 'wearing-off' phase before infusion and the subsequent relief post-infusion.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Forty-two RRMS patients were assessed one week before (T0) and two weeks after pre-and post-natalizumab infusion (T1) for fatigue symptoms using the Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive Functions (FSMC), the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS), and the Fatigue Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire–Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (FSIQ-RMS). Processing speed and depression were measured by the symbol digit modality test (SDMT), and the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). Participants were categorized into either the SID or EID dosing schedules of natalizumab, and their outcomes were compared.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Forty-two patients (21 SID; 21 EID) completed the study. Fatigue severity scales, SDMT, and BDI-II scores improved from T0 to T1. No significant differences in fatigue symptoms were found between the SID and EID groups, whether during the \"wearing-off\" period (T0) or post-infusion (T1).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Both SID and EID dosing regimens of natalizumab are similarly effective in reducing fatigue symptoms, depression and improving processing speed in individuals with RRMS, with no observed differences during the \"wearing-off\" periods or after re-infusion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18958,"journal":{"name":"Multiple sclerosis and related disorders","volume":"92 ","pages":"Article 106146"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple sclerosis and related disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211034824007223","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Fatigue, depression and slow processing speed are debilitating symptoms in people with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) that significantly impacts on the quality of life. Natalizumab, a disease-modifying treatment, improves clinical symptoms but questions remain about the comparative efficacy between its standard interval dosing (SID) and extended interval dosing (EID) schedules.

Objective

To examine the impact of short term natalizumab dosing schedules—SID versus EID—on the so called “invisible symptoms”, specifically focusing on symptom exacerbation during the 'wearing-off' phase before infusion and the subsequent relief post-infusion.

Methods

Forty-two RRMS patients were assessed one week before (T0) and two weeks after pre-and post-natalizumab infusion (T1) for fatigue symptoms using the Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive Functions (FSMC), the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS), and the Fatigue Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire–Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (FSIQ-RMS). Processing speed and depression were measured by the symbol digit modality test (SDMT), and the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). Participants were categorized into either the SID or EID dosing schedules of natalizumab, and their outcomes were compared.

Results

Forty-two patients (21 SID; 21 EID) completed the study. Fatigue severity scales, SDMT, and BDI-II scores improved from T0 to T1. No significant differences in fatigue symptoms were found between the SID and EID groups, whether during the "wearing-off" period (T0) or post-infusion (T1).

Conclusions

Both SID and EID dosing regimens of natalizumab are similarly effective in reducing fatigue symptoms, depression and improving processing speed in individuals with RRMS, with no observed differences during the "wearing-off" periods or after re-infusion.
多发性硬化症患者输注纳他珠单抗两周后,疲劳、抑郁和处理速度均有所改善:标准给药方案与延长给药间隔方案无差异
背景:疲劳、抑郁和处理速度缓慢是复发性多发性硬化症(RRMS)患者的衰弱症状,严重影响生活质量。纳妥珠单抗是一种疾病修饰治疗药物,可改善临床症状,但其标准间隔给药(SID)和延长间隔给药(EID)方案之间的疗效比较仍存在疑问:目的:研究短期纳他珠单抗给药方案(SID 与 EID)对所谓 "隐形症状 "的影响,特别关注输注前 "消退 "阶段症状加重和输注后症状缓解的情况:使用运动和认知功能疲劳量表(FSMC)、改良疲劳影响量表(MFIS)和疲劳症状和影响问卷-复发性多发性硬化症(FSIQ-RMS)对 42 名 RRMS 患者在输注纳妥珠单抗前一周(T0)和输注纳妥珠单抗后两周(T1)的疲劳症状进行评估。处理速度和抑郁程度通过符号数字模型测试(SDMT)和贝克抑郁量表-II(BDI-II)进行测量。参与者被分为纳他珠单抗SID或EID给药方案,并对其结果进行了比较:42名患者(21名SID;21名EID)完成了研究。疲劳严重程度量表、SDMT和BDI-II评分从T0到T1均有所改善。无论是在 "消退期"(T0)还是在输液后(T1),SID 组和 EID 组的疲劳症状均无明显差异:结论:纳他珠单抗的SID和EID给药方案在减轻RRMS患者的疲劳症状、抑郁和提高处理速度方面具有相似的疗效,在 "磨合期 "或再次输注后均未见差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
814
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Multiple Sclerosis is an area of ever expanding research and escalating publications. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders is a wide ranging international journal supported by key researchers from all neuroscience domains that focus on MS and associated disease of the central nervous system. The primary aim of this new journal is the rapid publication of high quality original research in the field. Important secondary aims will be timely updates and editorials on important scientific and clinical care advances, controversies in the field, and invited opinion articles from current thought leaders on topical issues. One section of the journal will focus on teaching, written to enhance the practice of community and academic neurologists involved in the care of MS patients. Summaries of key articles written for a lay audience will be provided as an on-line resource. A team of four chief editors is supported by leading section editors who will commission and appraise original and review articles concerning: clinical neurology, neuroimaging, neuropathology, neuroepidemiology, therapeutics, genetics / transcriptomics, experimental models, neuroimmunology, biomarkers, neuropsychology, neurorehabilitation, measurement scales, teaching, neuroethics and lay communication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信